Linguistic Z-number Muirhead mean operators and their applications in ethical-financial portfolio selection

Document Type : Article


1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Statistic and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

4 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, KHATAM University, Tehran, Iran


Traditionally the performance of firms is evaluated by financial criteria, but this study presents a new qualitative comprehensive framework that incorporates the ethical criteria into the portfolio models and it is widely matched with the preferences of socially responsible investors. The increase of corporate deceptions has caused investors or fund managers consider the ethical assessments in their investment management. Therefore, it is essential to develop models that capture the ethical criteria along with the financial criteria in the investment processes. In this study, a multi-stage methodology is proposed and linguistic Z-numbers are applied to represent the evaluation information, and the Muirhead mean (MM) aggregation operators are employed to fuse the input data under linguistic Z-number environment. Hence, we firstly develop four linguistic Z-number Muirhead mean operators. Then, using the max-score rule and the score-accuracy trade-off rule, three qualitative portfolio models are proposed. These models have been aimed to maximize the financial performance of portfolio as main objective and have been distinguished by the ethical goal that the investor follows. The obtained results of numerical example validates the capability of the models for constructing more diversified portfolio based on a trade-off between financial and ethical criteria according to investors’ preferences.


[1] Markowitz, H., “Portfolio selection”, J. Finance, 7, pp. 77–91, (1952).
[2] Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M.K., Saxena, A., “Hybrid optimization models of portfolio selection involving financial and ethical considerations”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, pp. 318–337, (2013).
[3] EUROSIF, 2018, European SRI Study, Available at: < >.
[4] Ballestero, E., Bravo, M., Perez-Gladish, B., et al., “Socially Responsible Investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives”, European Journal of Operational Research, 216, pp. 487–494, (2012).
[5] Trenado, M., Romero, M., Cuadrado, M.L., et al., “Corporate social responsibility in portfolio selection: A “goal games” against nature approach”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 75, pp. 260–265, (2014).
[6] An, D., Yang, Y., Chai, X., et al., “Mitigating pollution of hazardous materials from WEEE of China: Portfolio selection for a sustainable future based on multi-criteria decision making, Resources”, Conservation and Recycling, 105, pp. 198–210, (2015).
[7] Sehatpour, M.H., Kazemi, A., “Sustainable fuel portfolio optimization: Integrated fuzzy multi-objective programming and multi-criteria decision making”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, pp. 304-319, (2018).
[8] Yang C.H., “An optimization portfolio decision model of life cycle activity-based costing with carbon footprint constraints for hybrid green power strategies”, Computers and Operations Research, 96, pp. 256–271, (2018).
[9] Zadeh, L.A., “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, 8, pp. 338–353, (1965).
[10] Turksen, I. B., “Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, pp. 191-210, (1986).
[11] Dubois, D., Prade, H., “Fundamentals of fuzzy sets”, Springer, Berlin, (2000).
[12] Atanassov, K.T., “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, pp. 87–96, (1986).
[13] Torra, V. (2010), “Hesitant fuzzy sets”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25, pp. 529–539, (2010).
[14] Chen, N., Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M., “Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, pp. 528–540, (2013).
[15] Saborido, R., Ruiz, A. B., Bermúdez, J. D., et al., “Evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms for fuzzy portfolio selection”, Applied Soft Computing, 39, pp. 48–63, (2016).
[16] Vercher, E., Bermúdez, J. D., “Portfolio optimization using a credibility mean-absolute semi-deviation model”, Expert Systems with Applications, 42, pp. 7121–7131, (2015).
[17] Zhou, W., Xu, Z., “Portfolio selection and risk investment under the hesitant fuzzy environment”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 144, pp. 21-31, (2018).
[18] Zadeh, L. A., “A Note on Z-numbers”, Information Sciences, 181, pp. 2923–2932, (2011).
[19] Kang, B., Wei, D., Li, Y., et al., “A method of converting Z-number to classical fuzzy number”, Journal of Information and Computational Science, 9, pp. 703-709, (2012).
[20] Azadeh, A., Kokabi, R., “Z-number DEA: A new possibilistic DEA in the context of Z-numbers”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30, pp. 604–617, (2016).
[21] Aliev, R. A., Alizadeh, A. V., Huseynov, O. H., “The arithmetic of discrete Z-numbers”, Information Sciences, 290, pp. 134-155, (2015).
[22] Aliev, R. A., Huseynov, O. H., Zeinalova, L. M., “The arithmetic of continuous Z-numbers”, Information Sciences, 373, pp. 441–460, (2016).
[23] Bhanu, M.S., Velammal, G., “Operations on Zadeh’s Z-number. IOSR Journal of Mathematics”, 11, pp. 88–94, (2015).
[24] Bakar, A. S. A., Gegov, A., “Multi-layer decision methodology for ranking Z-numbers”, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8, pp. 395-406, (2015).
[25] Aliev, R. A., Huseynov, O. H., Serdaroglu, R., “Ranking of Z-numbers and its application in decision making”, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 15,, (2016).
[26] Ezadi, S., Allahviranloo, T., “New multi-layer method for Z-number ranking using hyperbolic tangent function and convex combination”, Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, (2017),
[27] Jiang, W., Xie, C., Luo, Y., et al., “Ranking Z-numbers with an improved ranking method for generalized fuzzy numbers”, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32, pp. 1931-1943, (2017).
[28] Qiu, D., Xing, Y., Dong, R., “On ranking of continuous Z-numbers with generalized centroids and optimization problems based on Z-numbers”, International Journal of Intelligent System, 33, pp. 4-13, (2018).
[29] Yager, R.R., “On Z-valuations using Zadeh’s Z-numbers”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 27, pp. 259–278, (2012).
[30] Aliev, R. A., Pedrycz, W., Huseynov, O.H., “Functions defined on a set of Z-numbers”, Information Sciences, 423, pp. 353–375, (2018).
[31] Yang, Y., Wang, J., “SMAA-based model for decision aiding using regret theory in discrete Z-number context”, Applied Soft Computing, 65, pp. 590-602, (2018). 
[32] Shen, K., Wang, J., “Z-VIKOR method based on a new comprehensive weighted distance measure of Z-number and its application”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2816581, (2018).
[33] Sadi-Nezhad, S., Sotoudeh-Anvari, A., “A new data envelopment analysis under uncertain environment with respect to fuzziness and an estimation of reliability”, OPSEARCH, 53, pp. 103-115, (2016).
[34] Yaakob, A. M., Gegov, A., “Interactive TOPSIS based group decision making methodology using Z-numbers”, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9, pp. 311-324, (2016).
[35] Jirofti, A., Najafi, A. B., “Portfolio Selection Using Z-Number Theory: Two Solution Methodologies”, International Journal of Fuzzy System, 20(8), pp. 2484–2496, (2018).
[36] Aboutorab, H., Saberi, M., Rajabi Asadabadi, M., et al., “ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development”, Expert Systems with Applications, 107, pp. 115–125, (2018).
[37] Peng, H., Wang, X., Wang, T., et al., “Multi-criteria game model based on the pairwise comparisons of strategies with Z-numbers”, Applied Soft Computing Journal, 74, pp. 451-465, (2018).
[38] Wang, J.Q., Lu, P., Zhang, H. Y., “Method of multi-criteria group decision-making based on cloud aggregation operators with linguistic information”, Information Sciences, 274, pp. 177–91, (2014).
[39] Wang, J., Cao, Y., Zhang, H., “Multi-criteria decision-making method based on distance measure and Choquet integral for linguistic Z-numbers”, Cognitive Computation, 9, pp. 827-842, (2017).
[40] Peng, H., Wang, J., “Hesitant uncertain linguistic Z-numbers and their application in multi-criteria group decision-making problems”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19, pp. 1300-1316, (2017).
[41] Liu, P.D., Teng, F., “Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on some normal neutrosophic number Heronian Mean operators”, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(3), pp. 2375-2391, (2017).
[42] Yager, R.R., “Prioritized aggregation operators”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 48, pp. 263–274, (2008).
[43] Xu, Y.J., Wang, H.M., “Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment”, Applied Soft Computing, 11, pp. 3988–3997, (2011).
[44] Zhang, H.M., “Some interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators and application in multi attribute group decision making”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, pp. 4269–4282, (2013).
[45] Wei, G., Zhao, X., Lin, R., et al., “Uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, pp. 5277–5285, (2013).
[46] Wang, J.Q., Wu, J.T., Wang J., et al., “Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making problems”, Information Sciences, 288, pp. 55–72, (2014).
[47] Wang, X.F., Wang, J.Q., Yang, W.E., “Multi-criteria group decision making method based on intuitionistic linguistic aggregation operators”, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 26, pp. 115–125, (2014).
[48] Xu, Z.S., “A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relation”, Information Sciences, 166, pp. 19–30, (2004).
[49] Zhou, H., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y., et al., “Linguistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on evidential reasoning”, International Journal of Systems Science, 47(2), pp. 314-327, (2016).
[50] Liu, P., Chen, S., Liu, J., “Multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy interaction partitioned Bonferroni mean operators”, Information Sciences, 411, pp. 98–121, (2017).
[51] Liu, P.D., Jin, F., “The trapezoid fuzzy linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making”, Scientia Iranica, 19 (6), pp. 1947–1959, (2010).
[52] Bonferroni, C., “ Sulle medie multiple di potenze”, Bolletino Matematica Italiana, 5, pp. 267–270, (1950).
[53] Yu, D.J., “Hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods based on Heronian mean”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23 (2), pp. 296-315, (2017).
[54] Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M., “Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means”, Information Sciences, 205, pp. 72–85, (2010).
[55] Muirhead, R.F., “Some methods applicable to identities and inequalities of symmetric algebraic functions of n letters”, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 21, pp. 144-162, (1902).
[56] Liu, P., Teng, F., “Some Muirhead Mean operators for Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets and Their Applications to Multiple Attribute Decision-Making”, Applied Soft Computing, 68, pp. 396-431, (2018).
[57] Zadeh, L.A., “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I”, Information Sciences, 8, pp. 199–249, (1975).
[58] Delgado, M., Verdegay, J.L., Vila, M.A., “Linguistic decision making models”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 7, pp. 479–492, (1992).
[59] Xu, Z.S., “Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment”, Information Sciences, 168, pp. 171–184, (2004).
[60] Xu, Z.S., “A note on linguistic hybrid arithmetic averaging operator in multiple attribute decision-making with linguistic information”, Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, pp. 593–604, (2006).
[61] Qin, J.D., Liu, X.W., “2-tuple linguistic Muirhead mean operators for multiple attribute group decision making and its application to supplier selection”, Kybernetes, 45(1), pp. 2-29, (2016).
[62] Hong, D.H., Choi, C.H., “Multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory”, Fuzzy Sets Systems, 114, pp. 103–113, (2000).
[63] Miras-Rodríguez, M.D.M., Carrasco-Gallego, A., Escobar-Perez, B., “Has the CSR engagement of electrical companies had an effect on their performance? A closer look at the environment”, Bus. Strategy Environ. 24 (8), pp. 819-835, (2015). 
[64] Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernandez-Izquierdo, M.A., Munoz-Torres, M.J., “The effect of environmental, social and governance consistency on economic results”, Sustainability, 8 (10), pp. 1-16, (2016). 
[65] Escrig-Olmedo, E., Rivera-Lirio, J.M., Munoz-Torres, M.J., et al., “Integrating multiple ESG investors' preferences into sustainable investment: A fuzzy multi-criteria methodological approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, pp. 1334-1345, (2017).
[66] Phillis, Y.A., Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L.A., “Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic”, Ecol. Econ. 37 (3), pp. 435-456, (2001). 
[67] Spernza, M. G., “A heuristic algorithm for a portfolio optimization model applied to the Milan Stock Market”, Computers and Operations Research, 23, pp. 433-441, (1996).
[68] Mansini, R., Speranza, M.G., “Heuristic algorithms for the portfolio selection problem with minimum transaction lots”, European Journal of Operational Research, 114, pp. 219-233, (1999).