Experimental investigation of bond characteristics of deformed and plain bars in low strength concrete

Document Type : Article


1 Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

2 Department of Civil Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan

3 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan

4 Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering, Cyprus University of Technology P.O. Box 50329, Lemesos 3603, Cyprus


The use of inferior quality materials, inadequate detailing and poor construction practices are responsible for most of the brittle failure modes of non-engineered reinforced concrete structures. Bond failures in non-engineered reinforced concrete elements due to short anchorages or low concrete cover result in large slip deformations prevent the development of plastic deformations and reduce energy dissipation capacity. Until now, little work has been carried out that can lead to the development of bond-slip relationships for low strength non-engineered reinforced concrete structures. To address this, experiments have been carried out on pullout and splitting specimens under monotonic loading to investigate bond characteristics of typically used steel bars in non-engineered reinforced concrete structures. Various deficient parameters are considered in the experiments in order to develop multi-parameter bond strength relations for low strength concrete ≤15MPa. The key parameters examined in the experiments are low strength concrete, bar development length, concrete cover, re-bar types (deformed and plain) and re-bar diameter. This paper presents the experimental details and results which are further processed to develop bond strength equations for different bar types in low strength concrete. These equations can be used to define the bond-slip relation for conducting seismic vulnerability assessment of non-engineered structures.


Main Subjects

1. Naseer, A. Ali, S.M. and Hussain, Z. Reconnaissance
report on the 8th October, 2005 earthquake Pakistan",
Earthquake Engineering Centre, Department of Civil
Engineering NWFP UET Peshawar, Pakistan (2006).
2. Duranni, A.J., Elnashai, A.S., Hashash, Y.M.A., Kim,
S.J., and Masud, A. The Kashmir earthquake of
October 8, 2005, A quick look report", Mid- America
Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign (2005).
3. Nisikawa, T., Nakano, Y., Tsuchiya, Y., Sanada,
Y., and Sameshima, H. Quick report of damage
investigation on buildings and houses due to October
8, 2005 Pakistan earthquake", Japan Society of Civil
Engineers (JSCE) and Architectural Institute of Japan
(AIJ) (2005).
4. Peiris, N., Rossetto, T., Burton, P., and Mahmood,
S. EEFIT mission: October 8, 2005 Kashmir Earthquake"
5. Bal, I.E., Crowley, H., Pinho, R.F., and Gulay, F.G.
Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of
Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models",
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(10),
pp. 914-932 (2008).
6. Hong, C. and Araki, H. Bond characteristics between
low strength concrete and plain round bar under
reversal loading", 15th WCEE, Lisboa (2012)
7. Ahmad, S., Assessment of Damages Caused to Structures
Due to October 8th, 2005 Kashmir Earthquake,
Pakistan, The University of Sheeld (2007).
https://www.sheeld.ac.uk/polopoly fs/1.107463!/
8. Chaudat, T., Garnier, C., Cvejic, S., Poupin, S.,
LeCorre, M., and Mahe, M. Seismic tests on a
reinforced concrete bare frame with FRP retro ttingtests
report ecoleader project no 2", CEA Internal
Report 05-006/A (2005).
9. Pinho, R. and Elnashai, A.S. Dynamic collapse testing
of full scale four storey RC frame", ISET Journal
of Earthquake Technology, Paper No. 406, 37(4), pp.
143-163 (2000)
10. ACI408R-03 Bond and development of straight reinforcing
bars in tension", American Concrete Institute
11. ACI408.2 Bond under cyclic loading", Technical Report.
American Concrete Institute (2005).
12. Kyriakides, N., Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of
RC Buildings and Risk Assessment for Cyprus, The
University of Sheeld (2008).
13. Mohamad, A.Z. and Clark, L.A. Bond behaviour
of low-strength concrete", Mangzine of Concrete Research,
44(160), pp. 195-203 (1992).
14. Feldman, L.R. and Bartlett, F.M. Bond strength variability
in pullout specimens with plain reinforcement",
ACI Structural Journal, 102(6), pp. 860-867 (2005).
15. Bedirhanoglu, L., Iiki, A., Pujol, S., and Kumbassar,
N. Behaviour of de cient joints with plain bars
and low strength concrete", ACI Structural Journal,
107(3), pp. 300-310 (2010).
16. Ahmad, S. Seismic vulnerability of non-ductile reinforced
concrete structures in developing countries",
Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Sheeld, U.K. (2011).
17. Ahmad, S., Ra , M.M., Pilakoutas, K., Khan, Q.U.Z.,
Shabbir, F., and Tahir M.F. Bond-slip Behaviour of
steel bars in low-strength concrete", Institute of Civil
Engineers, Structures and Buildings, 169(7), pp. 524-
537 (2016).
18. BS1881-121 Testing concrete - Part 121: Method
for determination of static modulus of elasticity in
19. BS:EN12390-6 Testing hardened concrete - Part 6:
Tensile splitting strength of test specimens" (2000).
20. RILEM/CEB/FIP Recommendation RC 6 Bond test
for reinforcing steel: Pullout test" (1978).
21. Orangun, C.O., Jirsa, J.O., and Breen, J.E. The
strength of anchored bars: a re-evaluation of test
data on development length and splices", Research
Report No.154-3F, Center For Highway Research, The
University Of Texas At Austin (1975).
22. Darwin, D., Mccabe, S.L., Idun, E.K., and
Schoenekase, S.P. Development length criteria: bars
without transverse reinforcement", The Civil Engineering
Research Foundation Contract No 91-N6002
The National Science Foundation, Research Grant
No. MSM-9021066, The Reinforced Concrete Research
Council, Project 56 (1992).
23. Tepfers, R. A theory of bond applied to overlapped
tensile reinforcement splices for deformed bars", Publ
73:2. Division of Concrete Structures, Chalmers University
of Technology, Goteborg, p. 328, Doktorsavhandling
24. Zuo, J. and Darwin, D. Splice strength of conventional
and high relative rib area bars in normal
and high-strength concrete", ACI Structural Journal,
97(4), pp. 630-641 (2000).
2966 S. Ahmad et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 25 (2018) 2954{2966