The NDEA–MOP Model in the Presence of Negative Data Using Fuzzy Method

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Mathematics, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Management, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Industrial Engineering, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Mathematics, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In this study, the multi-objective programming (MOP) method was used to solve network DEA (NDEA) models with assumption that, negative data is considered for the proposed NDEA model which consists of semi-negative and semi-positive input and output. At first, two stage and then k stage production models were formulated with consideration of negative data. In the multi-objective programming, two separate objective functions including the divisional efficiencies and the overall efficiency of the organization are modeled.  In comparison to conventional DEA with negative data, the advantage of the proposed NDEA models is consideration of intermediate processes and products, in order to calculate the organization's overall efficiency. However, in conventional DEA, sub-stages of the organizations are neglected. To measure the efficiencies of an organization regarding interactive internal process, two case studies were investigated by application of the NDEA-MOP method with negative data. Case study 1 is focused on units with two stages having semi-negative and semi-positive indexes. In case study 2, units with three stages are evaluated. These units also have semi-negative and semi-positive indexes. The overall efficiency of each unit is calculated using the proposed models. Fuzzy approach as a solution procedure is applied.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References

1. Tone, K. and Tsutsui, M. \Network DEA: A slacksbased measure approach", Eur. J. Oper. Res., 197(1), pp. 243-252 (2009).
 2. Sexton, T.R. and Lewis, H.F. \Two-stage DEA: An application to major league baseball", J. Prod. Anal. 19(2), pp. 227-249 (2003).
3. Despotis, D.K. and Koronakos, G. \Eciency assessment
in two-stage processes: A novel network DEA
Approach", Pro. Computer Science, 31, pp. 299-307
(2014).
4. Carayannis, E.G., Goletsis, Y. and Grigoroudis, E.
\Multi-level multi-stage eciency measurement: the
case of innovation systems", Oper. Res., 15(2) pp. 253-
274 (2015).
5. Jarosz, P., Kusiak, J., MaBecki, S.B., Oprocha, P.,
Sztangret, A. and Wilkus, M.A. \Methodology for
optimization in multistage industrial processes: A
Pilot Study", Math. Prob. Eng., 2015, pp. 1-10 (2015).
6. Gang, D., Li, C., Yin-Zhen, L. and Jie-Yan, S.A. \Tanweer,
optimization on production-inventory problem
with multistage and varying demand", J. Appl. Math.,
2012, pp. 1-17 (2012).
7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. \Measuring
the eciency of decision making units", Eur. J.
Oper. Res., 2(6), pp. 429-444 (1978).
8. Banke, R., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. \Some
models for estimating technical and scale ineciencies
in data envelopment analysis", Manag. Sci., 30(9), pp.
1078-1092 (1984).
9. Cheng, H., Zhang, Y., Cai, J. and Huang, W. \A
multiobjective programming method for ranking all
units based on compensatory DEA model", Math.
Prob. Eng., 2014, pp. 1-14. (2014).
10. Kao, H.Y., Chan, C.Y. and Wu, D.J. \A multiobjective
programming method for solving network
DEA", Appl. Soft Comput., 24(2014), pp. 406-413
(2014).
11. Kazemi Matin, R. and Azizi, R. \A uni ed network-
DEA model for performance measurement of production
systems", Measurement., 60, pp. 186-193 (2015).
12. Wang, W.K., Lu, W.M. and Liu, P.Y. \A fuzzy multiobjective
two-stage DEA model for evaluating the
K. Kianfar et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 25 (2018) 398{409 409
performance of US bank holding companies", Expert.
Syst. Appl., 41(9), pp. 4290-4297 (2014).
13. Dimitris, K. and Despotis, G.K. \Eciency assessment
in two-stage processes: A novel network DEA
approach", Procedia. Comput. Sci., 31, pp. 299-307
(2014).
14. Halkos, G.E., Tzeremes, N.G. and Kourtzidis, S.A. \A
uni ed classi cation of two-stage DEA models", Sur.
Oper. Res. Manag. Sci., 19(1), pp. 1-16 (2014).
15. Lee, E.S. and Li, R.J. \Fuzzy multiple objective programming
and compromise programming with Pareto
optimum", Fuzzy Set. Syst., 53(3), pp. 275-288 (1993).
16. Izadikhah, M. and Farzipoor Saen, R. \Evaluating
sustainability of supply chains by two-stage range
directional measure in the presence of negative data",
Trans. Res. Part D., 49, pp. 110-126 (2016).
17. Olfata, L., Amiri, M., Sou , J.B. and Pishdar, M. \A
dynamic network eciency measurement of airports
performance considering sustainable development concept:
A fuzzy dynamic network-DEA approach", J.
Air. Trans. Manag., 57, pp. 272-290 (2016).
18. Chen, Y. and Zhu, J. \Measuring information technology's
indirect impact on rm performance", Inform.
Tech. Manag. J., 5(1-2) pp. 9-22 (2004).
19. Tone, K. and Tsutsui, M. \Network DEA: a slacksbased
measure approach", Eur. J.Oper. Res 197, pp.
243-252 (2009).

Scientia Iranica
Volume 25, Issue 1
Transactions on Industrial Engineering (E)
January and February 2018
Pages 398-409

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics