Behavioral analysis of vehicle-pedestrian interactions in Iran

Document Type : Article


1 Civil Engineering Department of Babol Noshirvani University of Technology

2 Civil Engineering Department of Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran


Statistics upon injured and killed pedestrian accidents in recent years expresses a high vulnerability of this group of road users. By identifying influential factors on the interactions of pedestrians-vehicles and representing appropriate solutions to reduce the impact of these factors, the possibility of such interactions and consequently, the relative accidents can be reduced. In present research, based on naturalistic driving studies (NDS), the driving behavior of 29 drivers of vehicles was investigated. 289 vehicle-pedestrian interactions in the local urban routes of Babol City in Mazandaran, Iran at the traffic peak hours were determined. By analyzing the interactions using the DREAM method (Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method), the risk factors were identified and two causal patterns were determined for pedestrian crossings and places lacking pedestrian crossings. Drivers talking to passengers and listening to music were among the factors influencing occurrence of interactions at pedestrian crossings. Unexpected behaviors by pedestrians while crossing (such as sudden running, crossing careless of the traffic flow, and crossing without obtaining the permission from the vehicle driver) played a substantial role in occurrence of interactions in places without pedestrian crossings. Finally, some solutions were proposed for reducing the chances of occurrence of interactions.


Main Subjects


1. WHO, Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time for
Action, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva,
Switzerland (2009).
2. OECD Sta , Road Accidents: On-site Investigations,
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD), Paris (1988).
3. Larsen, L. Methods of multidisciplinary in-depth
analyses of road trac accidents", Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 111(1-3), pp. 115-122 (2004).
4. Shinar, D., Treat, J.R., and McDonald, S.T. The
validity of police reported accident data", Accident
Analysis and Prevention, 15(3), pp. 175-191 (1983).
5. Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Neale, V.L., Petersen, A.,
Lee, S.E., and Sudweeks, J., The 100-car naturalistic
1976 A. Sheykhfard and F. Haghighi/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 25 (2018) 1968{1976
driving study. Phase II: Results of the 100-car eld
experiment, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute,
National Highway Trac Safety Admin (NHTSA), p.
422 (2006).
6. Hunter, E., Salamati, K., Elefteriadou, L., Sisiopiku,
V., Rouphail, N., Phillips, B., and Schroeder, B.
Driver yielding at unsignalized midblock crossings",
Proceedings of the 94th Transportation Research Board
Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. (2015).
7. Sucha, M. Pedestrians and drivers: their encounters
at zebra crossings", 8th International Trac Expert
Congress, 8 to 9 May, Warsaw (2014).
8. Seipone, B. and Mphele, M. Who owns the road?
Exploring driver and pedestrian behavior at zebra/
pedestrian crossings in gaborone", Botswana.
British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 1(13), pp.
2046-9578 (2013).
9. Langbroek, J., Ceunynck, T., Daniels, S., Svensson,
A., Laureshyn, A., Brijs, T., and Wets, G. Analyzing
interactions between pedestrians and motor vehicles
at two-phase signalized intersections-an explorative
study combining trac behavior and trac con
observations in a cross-national context", International
Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Trac
Safety(ICTCT), Proceedings (CD-Rom) p. 1-21 (2012).
10. Habibovic, A. and Davidsson, J. Requirments of a
system to reduce car-to-vulnerable road user crashes
in urban intersections", Accident Analysis and Prevention,
43(4), pp. 1570-1580 (2011).
11. Warner, H.W. and Sandin, J. The intercoder agreement
when using the driving reliability and error analysis
method in road trac accident investigations",
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48(5), pp. 527-536
12. Habibovic, A., Tivesten, E., Uchida, N., Bargman, J.,
and Ljung, M. Driver behavior in car-to-pedestrian
incidents: An application of the driving reliability and
error analysis method (DREAM). Accident Analysis
and Prevention, 50, pp. 554-565 (2013).
13. Sandin, J. An analysis of common patterns in aggregated
causation charts from intersection crashes",
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, pp. 624-632
14. Warner, H.W., Ljung, M., Sandin, J., Johansson, E.,
and Bjorklund, G. Manual for DREAM 3.0, Driving
Reliability and Error Analysis Method", Chalmers
University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden (2008).
15. Emre, O. and Engin, E. Driver status identi cation
from driving behavior signals", Digital Signal Processing
For In-Vehicle Systems and Safety, pp. 31-55
16. Wu, C. and Xiangling, Z. Pedestrian gestures increase
driver yielding at uncontrolled mid-block road crossings",
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 70, pp. 235-
244 (2014).
17. Lenard, J. and Hill, J. Interaction of road environment,
vehicle and human factors in the causation of
pedestrian accidents," in Proceedings of International
Conference on ESAR (Expert Symposium on Accident
Research), 3-4 September , Hannover, Germany,
18. Neale, V., Dingus, T., Klauer, S.H., Sudweeks, J., and
Goodman, M. An Overview of the 100-Car Naturalistic
Study and Findings, Virginia Tech Transportation
Institute, National Highway Trac Safety Administration,
United States, pp. 05-0400 (2011).