References
1. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. “Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units”, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2(6), pp. 429-444 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
2. Seiford, L.M. and Thrall, R.M. “Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis”, J. of Eco., 46(1), pp. 7-38 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-U
3. Korhonen, P. and Luptacik, M. “Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis”, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 154(2), pp. 437-446 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00180-2
4. Kazemi Matin, R., Jahanshahloo, G.R., and Vencheh, A.H. “Inefficiency evaluation with an additive DEA model under imprecise data, an application on IAUK departments”, J. of Oper. Res. Soci. of Japan, 50(3), pp. 163-177 (2007). https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.50.163
5. Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B., and Tavares, G. “Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA”, Socio-Eco. Plan. Sci., 42(5), pp.151-157 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002
6. Hadi-Vencheh, A. and Kazemi Matin, R. “An application of IDEA to wheat farming efficiency”, Agri. Eco., 42(2), pp. 487-493 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00528.x
7. Wang, M. and Li, Y. “Full rank of fuzzy decision-making units based on enhanced Russell measure”, Chin. J. of Manag. Sci., 22(3), pp. 115-120 (2014).
8. Emrouznejad, A. and Yang, G. “A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978-2016”, Socio-Eco. Plan. Sci., 61(4), pp. 4-8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008
9. Tavassoli, M., Fathi, A., and Farzipoor Saen, R. “Developing a new super-efficiency DEA model in the presence of both zero data and stochastic data: A case study in the Iranian airline industry”, Benchmarking: an International J., 28(1), pp. 42-65 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2020-0044
10. Nemati, M., Farzipoor Saen, R., and Kazemi Matin, R. “A data envelopment analysis approach by partial impacts between inputs and desirable-undesirable outputs”, Indust. Manage. and Data Sys., 121(4), pp. 809-838 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0653
11. Hajaji, H., Yousefi, S., Farzipoor Saen, et al. “Recommending investment opportunities given congestion by adaptive network data envelopment analysis model: Assessing sustainability of supply chains”, RAIRO-Operations Res., 55(1), pp. 21-49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2019059
12. Yousefi, S., Shabanpour, H., and Farzipoor Saen, R. “Sustainable clustering of customers using capacitive artificial neural networks: A case study in Pegah distribution company”, RAIRO-Operations Res., 55(1), pp. 51-60 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2020059
13. Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., and Diewert, W.E. “The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity”, Econometrica., 50(6), pp. 1393-1414 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388
14. Färe, R., Grosskopf, Sh., Lindgren, B., et al. “Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: A Malmquist output index approach”, Springer, pp. 127-190 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0637-5-13
15. Lissitsa, A. and Odening, M. “Efficiency and total factor productivity in Ukrainian agriculture in transition”, Agri. Eco., 32(3), pp. 311-325 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00062.x
16. Guzman, I. and Reverte, C. “Productivity and efficiency change and shareholder value: evidence from the Spanish banking sector”, Application Economics., 40(15), pp. 2037–2044 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600949413
17. Emrouznejad, A. and Yang, G. “A framework for measuring global Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index with CO2 emissions on Chinese manufacturing industries”, Energy., 115(15), pp. 840-856 (2016a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.032
18. Emrouznejad, A. and Yang, G. “CO2 emissions reduction of Chinese light manufacturing industries: A novel RAM-based global Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index”, Energy Policy., 96(2), pp. 397-410 (2016b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.023
19. Chen, S.Y. and Golley, J. “Green productivity growth in China's industry economy”, Energy Eco., 44(2), pp. 89-98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.002
20. Luenberger, D.G. “Benefit function and duality”, J. of Math. Eco., 21(5), pp. 461-481 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(92)90035-6
21. Luenberger, D.G. “New optimality principles for economic efficiency and equilibrium”, J. of Optimization Theory and Applications., 75(4), pp. 211-264 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941466
22. Pastor, J.T. and Lovell, C.A.K. “A global Malmquist productivity index”, Economics Letters., 88(2), pp. 266-271 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.02.013
23. Shestalova, V. “Sequential Malmquist indices of productivity growth: An application to OECD industrial activities”, J. of Pro. Analy., 19(5), pp. 211-226 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022857501478
24. Oh, D.H. and Heshmati, A. “A sequential Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index: Environmentally sensitive productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology”, Energy Economics., 32(6), pp. 1345-1355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.09.003
25. Oh, D.H. and Lee, J.D. “A metafrontier approach for measuring Malmquist productivity index”, Empirical Economics., 38(1), pp. 46-64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0255-0
26. Wang, Y.M. and Lan, Y.X. “Measuring Malmquist productivity index: a new approach based on double frontiers data envelopment analysis”, Math. and Comp. Modell., 54(3), pp. 2760-2771 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.06.064
27. Molinos, M., Maziotis, A., and Ramón, S-G. “The Luenberger productivity indicator in the water industry: An empirical analysis for England and Wales”, Utilities Policy, 30(2), pp. 18-28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2014.07.001
28. O’Donnell, C., Rao, D.S.P., and Battese, G. “Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios”, Empirical Economics., 34(2), pp. 231-255 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-007-0119-4
29. Portala, C.S. and Thanassoulis, E. “Economic efficiency when prices are not fixed: Disentangling quantity and price efficiency”, Omega, 47(C), pp. 36-44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.03.005
30. Färe, R. and Grosskopf, S. “Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs”, J. of Agri. Eco., 85(4), pp. 1070-1074 (2003).
31. Oh, D.H. “A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index”, J. of Pro. Analy., 34(3), pp. 183-197 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0178-y
32. Maniadakis, N. and Thanassoulis, E. “A cost Malmquist productivity index”, Eur. J. of Ope. Res, 154(2), pp. 396-409 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00177-2
33. Tohidi, G., Razavyan, S., and Tohidnia, S. “A profit Malmquist productivity index”, J. of Ind. Engine. Inter., 6(11), pp. 23-30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.026
34. Tohidi, G., Razavyan, S., and Tohidnia, S. “A global cost Malmquist productivity index using data envelopment analysis”, J. of the Ope. Res. Soci., 63(1), pp. 23-30 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.23
35. Tohidi, G. and Razavyan, S. “A circular global profit Malmquist productivity index in data envelopment analysis”, Applied Math. Modell., 37(1), pp. 216-227 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.026
36. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C.A.K., et al. “Deviation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: A distance function approach”, The Review of Economics and Statistics., 75(2), pp. 374-380 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2109448
37. Arabi B., Munisamy, S., and Emrouznejad, A. “A new slacks–based measure of Malmquist–Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs”, Omega., 51, pp. 29-37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.08.006
38. Kousmanen, T. “Weak disposability in nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs”, J. of Agri. Eco., 87(4), pp. 1077-1082 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00788.x
39. Shephard, R.W. “Indirect production functions”, Math. System in Eco., 10, Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan. (1974).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75751-1_6
40. Hailu, A. and Veeman, T. “Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to Canadian pulp and paper industry”, J. of Agri. Eco., 83(3), pp. 605-616 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00181
41. Scheel, H. “Undesirable outputs in efficiency evaluations”, Eur. J. of Oper. Res., 132(2), pp. 400-410 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0
42. Kousmanen, T. and Podinovski, V. “Weak disposability in nonparametric productivity analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf”, J. of Agri. Eco., 91(2), pp. 539-545 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01238.x
43. Azadi, M. and Farzipoor Saen, R. “Supplier selection using a new Russell model in the presence of undesirable outputs and stochastic data”, J. of App Sci., 12(4), pp. 336-344 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2012.336.344
44. Momeni, E. and Farzipoor Saen, R. “Developing a new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis in the presence of stochastic data”, Int. J. of Business Excellence, 5(3), pp. 169-194 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2012.046638
45. Skevas, T., Lansink, A.O., and Stefanou, S.E. “Measuring technical efficiency in the presence of pesticide spillovers and production uncertainty: The case of Dutch arable farms”, Eur. J. of Oper. Res., 223(2), pp. 550-559 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.034
46. Tavana, M., Izadikhah, M., Farzipoor Saen, R., et al. “An integrated data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment method for performance measurement in green construction management”, Environmental Sci. and Pollution Res., 28(1), pp. 664-682 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10353-7
47. Zare Haghighi, H. and Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. “Russell measure for modeling environmental performance”, Int. J. of DEA., 2(1), pp. 334-340 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.02.005
48. Wu, J., Yao, X., and Wang, B. “Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed undesirable output data envelopment analysis”, J. of Cleaner Prouct., 74(3), pp. 96-104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.054
49. Jamshidi, M., Saneie, M., Mahmoodirad, A., et al. “Uncertain Russell data envelopment analysis model: A case study in Iranian banks”, J. of Intelligent and Fuzzy Sys., 37(2), pp. 2937-2951 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190067
50. Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z., and Li, S.X. “Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis”, J. of Oper. Res. Soc., 53(12), pp.1347-1356 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601433
51. Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z., and Li, S.X. “Chance constrained programming approaches to congestion in stochastic data envelopment analysis”, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 155(6), pp. 487-501 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00901-3
52. Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z., Li, S.X., et al. “Efficiency aggregation with enhanced Russell measures in data envelopment analysis”, Socio-Eco. Plan. Sci., 41(1), pp.1-21 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2006.03.001
53. Azadi, M. and Farzipoor Saen, R. “Developing a chance-constrained free disposable hull model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers”, Int. J. Oper. Res. and Information. Sys., 4(4), pp. 96-113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijoris.2013100106
54. Azadi, M. and Farzipoor Saen, R. “Developing a new theory of integer-valued data envelopment analysis for supplier selection in the presence of stochastic data”, Int. J. of Information. Sys. and Supp. Chain Manage., 7(3), pp. 80-103 (2014).
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijisscm.2014070104
55. Khodabakhshi, M. “Estimating most productive scale size with stochastic data envelopment analysis”, Economic Modelling, 26(5), pp. 968-973 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.03.002
56. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jahanshahloo, G.R., Behzadi, M.H., et al. “Estimating stochastic Malmquist productivity index”, World App. Sci. J., 13(10), pp. 2178-2185 (2011).
57. Eslami, R., Khodabakhshi, M, Jahanshahloo, G.R., et al. “Estimating most productive scale size with imprecise-chance constrained input-output orientation model in data envelopment analysis”, Comp. and Indust. Engine., 63(1), pp. 254-261 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.009
58. Izadikhah, M., Azadi, M., Shokri Kahi, V., et al. “Developing a new chance constrained NDEA model to measure the performance of humanitarian supply chains”, Int. J. of Pro. Res., 57(3), pp. 662-682 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1480840
59. Majumder, S., Kundu, P., Kar, S., et al. “Uncertain multi-objective multi-item fixed charge solid transportation problem with budget constraint”, Soft Comp., 23(10), pp. 3279-3301 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2987-7
60. Mahmoodirad, A., Dehghan, R., and Niroomand, S. “Modelling linear fractional transportation problem in belief degree-based uncertain environment”, J. of Experimental and Theoretical Intelligence., 31(3), pp. 393-408 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2018.1552318
61. Hajiagha, SHR., Daneshvar, M., and Antucheviciene, J. “A hybrid fuzzy-stochastic multi-criteria ABC inventory classification using possibilistic chance-constrained programming”, Soft Computing., 27(6), pp. 12-20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05204-z
62. Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M. “Measurement of returns to scale and damages to scale for DEA based operational and environmental assessment: How to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs?”, Eur. J. of Oper. Res., 211(1), pp 76-89 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.013
63. Hsiao, B., Chern, C.C., and Chiu, C.R. “Performance evaluation with the entropy based weighted Russell measure in data envelopment analysis”, Expert Sys. with Applications., 38(8), pp. 9965-9972 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.033
64. Lozano, S., Adenso-Díaz, B., and Barba-Gutierrez, Y. “Russell non-radial eco-efficiency measure and scale elasticity of a sample of electric/electronic products”, J. of the Franklin Institute., 348(7), pp. 1605-1614 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.02.005
65. Levkoff, S.B., Robert Russell, R., and Schworm, W. “Boundary problems with the `Russell’ graph measure of technical efficiency: A refinement”, J. of Pro. Analy., 37(3), pp. 239-248 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0241-3
66. Wang, Q., Zhou, P., Zhao, Z., et al. “Energy efficiency and energy saving potential in China: A directional meta-frontier DEA approach”, Sustainability., 6(8), pp. 5476-5492 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/su6085476
67. Esmaeili, M. “An enhanced Russell measure in DEA with interval data”, App. Math. and Comp., 219(4), pp. 1589-1593 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.07.060
68. Chen, P.-C., Yu, M.-M., Chang, C.-C., et al. “Non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable outputs”, Working Paper, Tohoku University (2011). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622015500091
69. Chen, P.-C., Yu, M.-M., Chang, C.C., et al. “Nonradial directional performance measurement with undesirable outputs: an application to OECD and non-OECD countries”, Int. J. of Information Tech. and DMU., 14(3), pp. 481-520 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622015500091
70. Yao, X., Chengwen, G., Shuai, S., et al. “Total-factor CO2 emission performance of China’s provincial industrial sector: A meta-frontier non-radial Malmquist index approach”, Applied Energy, 184(C), pp. 1142-1153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.064
71. Aparicio, J., Crespo-Cebada, E., Pedraja-Chaparro, F., et al. “Comparing school ownership performance using a pseudo-panel database: A Malmquist-type index approach”, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 256(2), pp. 533-542 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.030
72. Nakano, M. and Managi, S. “Regulatory reforms and productivity: an empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industry”, Energy Policy., 36(4), pp. 201-209 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.003
73. Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M. “Photovoltaic power stations in Germany and the United States: a comparative study by data envelopment analysis”, Energy Economics., 42(C), pp. 271-288 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.01.004
74. Zhang, N. and Choi, Y. “A note on the evolution of directional distance function and its development in energy and environmental studies 1997-2013”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews., 33(2), pp. 50-59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.064
75. Giménez, V., Prior, D., and Thieme, C. “An international comparison of Educational systems: an application of the global Malmquist-Luenberger Index”, Working Papers., Economics Department, University Jaume I, Castellon (Spain) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-017-0491-9
76. Chung, Y.H., Färe, R., and Grosskopf, S. “Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach”, J. of Enviro. Manage., 51(3), pp. 229-240 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146
77. Jonsson, D., Medbo, L., and Engström, T. “Some considerations relating to the reintroduction of assembly lines in the Swedish automotive industry”, Int J. of Oper. and Product. Manage., 24(8), pp. 754-772 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410548202
78. Hanson, R. and A. Brolin. “A comparison of kitting and continuous supply in in-plant materials supply”, Int. J. of Pro. Res.,51(4), pp. 979-992 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.657806
79. Hanson, R. and L. Medbo. “Man-hour efficiency of manual kit preparation in the materials supply to mass-customized assembly”, Int. J. of Pro. Res., 57(11), pp. 3735-3747 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1566653
)