Investigation on flow characteristics of generic car body with different boundary conditions

Document Type : Research Note

Authors

1 Faculty of Engineering, Cukurova University Automotive Engineering, Adana, 01380, Turkey

2 Faculty of Engineering, Amasya University, Mechanical Engineering, Amasya, 05000, Turkey

Abstract

In research automotive aerodynamics, it is not common to focus on a specific vehicle due to restricted access to the CAD geometries, their short life span, and limited validation data. For this reason, researchers prefer generic bodies that look like automobiles such as Ahmed Body in their investigations. However, the absence of moving ground and rotating wheels makes these generic bodies unrealistic for aerodynamic studies. In this context, including wheels in CFD simulations, varying ground and wheel boundary conditions, and comparing their qualitative and quantitative flow parameters with the original Ahmed Body experiment is the main objective of this paper. Results have shown that changing stationary ground and wheel boundaries into moving and rotating boundaries do have minor effects on wake characteristics and drag coefficients. However, just the presence of wheels on the model increases force coefficients significantly (increment in drag and lift coefficients by 27.32% and 188.5 counts, respectively.) even though these boundaries are stationary. As a result, the absence of moving ground and rotating wheels can be tolerated to some extent (especially for experimental studies in which inclusion of moving and rotating boundaries may have difficulties). However, a study cannot be evaluated exactly with a model without wheels.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References:
1. Katz, J., Automotive Aerodynamics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2016). 
2. Wang, Y., Wu, C., Tan, G., et al. "Reduction in the aerodynamic drag around a generic vehicle by using a non-smooth surface", Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng., 231(1), pp. 130-144 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407016636970.
3. Morel, T. "Effect of base slant on the  flow pattern and drag of three-dimensional bodies with blunt ends.", Aerodyn. Drag Mech. Bluff Bodies Road Veh., Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 191-226 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8434-2 8.
4. Ahmed, S.R., Ramm, G., and Faltin, G. "Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake", SAE Tech. Pap., 93, Section 2: 840222-840402, pp. 473-503 (1984). https://doi.org/10.4271/840300.
5. Dobrev, I. and Massouh, F. "Investigation of relationship between drag and lift coefficients for a generic car model", BULTRANS-2014, pp. 171-174 (2014). 
6. Sumida, M. and Hayakawa, K. "Aerodynamic forces acting on Ahmed-type vehicles under  fluctuating headwind conditions", J. Appl. Fluid Mech., 12(5), pp. 1563-1574 (2019). https://doi.org/10.29252/JAFM.12.05.29774.
7. Meile, W., Brenn, G., Reppenhagen, A., et al. "Experiments and numerical simulations on the aerodynamics of the ahmed body", CFD Lett., 3(1), pp. 32-38 (2011). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781107415324.004.
8. Bayraktar, I., Landman, D., and Baysal, O., Experimental and Computational Investigation of Ahmed Body for Ground Vehicle Aerodynamics, 110, Section 2: SAE technical papers, pp. 321-331 (2001). https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-2742.
9. Strachan, R.K., Knowles, K., and Lawson, N.J. "The vortex structure behind an Ahmed reference model in the presence of a moving ground plane", Exp. Fluids, 42(5), pp. 659-669 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-007-0270-x.
10. Gulyas, A., Bodor, A., Regert, T., et al. "PIV measurement of the  flow past a generic car body with wheels at LES applicable Reynolds number", Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 43, pp. 220-232 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheat fluid flow.2013.05.012.
11. Huminic, A. and Huminic, G. "Aerodynamic study of a generic car model with wheels and underbody diffuser", Int. J. Automot. Technol., 18(3), pp. 397- 404 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0040-6.
12. Wang, S., Avadiar, T., Thompson, M.C., et al. "Effect of moving ground on the aerodynamics of a generic automotive model: The DrivAer-Estate", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 195, p. 104000 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02850-8.
13. Krajnovic, S. and Davidson, L. "Influence of  floor motions in wind tunnels on the aerodynamics of road vehicles", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 93(9), pp. 677- 696 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104411.
14. Krajnovic, S., Sarmast, S., and Basara, B. "Numerical investigation of the flow around a simplified wheel in a wheelhouse", J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME, 133(11), pp. 1-12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.15.01.32832.
15. Zhou, H., Qin, R., Wang, G., et al. "Comparative analysis of the aerodynamic behavior on Ahmed body mounted with different wheel configurations", Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng., 238(1), pp. 128-146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/ fluids7020052.
16. Aljure, D., Lehmkuhl, O., Favre, F., et al. "On the IBM approximation for the wheel aerodynamic simulation", In Proceedings of the First International Conference in Numerical and Experimental Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles and Trains (Aerovehicles 1), Bordeaux, France, pp. 23-25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-4034.
17. Regert, T. and Lajos, T. "Description of  flow field in the wheelhouses of cars", Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 28(4), pp. 616-629 (2007). 
18. Menter, F. "Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic  flows", NASA Tech. Memo., 103978, pp. 1-31 (1992).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp fluid.2017.01.005.
19. Siddiqui, N.A. and Chaab, M.A. "A simple passive device for the drag reduction of an Ahmed obdy", J. Appl. Fluid Mech., 14(1), pp. 147-164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.14.01.31791.
20. Guilmineau, E., Deng, G.B., Leroyer, A., et al. "Assessment of hybrid RANS-LES formulations for  flow simulation around the Ahmed body", Comput. Fluids, 176, pp. 302-319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104330.
21. Zhang, C., Bounds, C.P., Foster, L., et al. "Turbulence modeling effects on the CFD predictions of  flow over a detailed full-scale sedan vehicle", Fluids, 4(3), pp. 1-28 (2019).
22. Mohammadikalakoo, B., Schito, P., and Mani, M. "Passive  flow control on Ahmed body by rear linking tunnels", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 205, pp. 1-16 (2020).
23. Davidson, L. "Assessment of turbulence models for  flow simulation around the Ahmed body", Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 32(1), pp. 1-32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1989372.
24. Lienhart, H. and Becker, S., Flow and Turbulence Structure in the Wake of a Simplified Car Model, SAE transactions, pp. 785-796 (2003). 
25. Avadiar, T., Thompson, M.C., Sheridan, J., et al. "Characterisation of the wake of the DrivAer estate vehicle", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 177, pp. 242- 259 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380836.
26. Tunay, T., Firat, E., and Sahin, B. "Experimental investigation of the  flow around a simplified ground vehicle under effects of the steady crosswind", Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 71, pp. 137-152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-0119.
27. Krajnovic, S. and Davidson, L. "Flow around a simplified car, part 2: Understanding the  flow", J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME, 127(5), pp. 919-928 (2005). 
28. Kang, S.-O., Jun, S.-O., Park, H. H.-I., et al. "Influence of rotating wheel and moving ground condition to aerodynamic performance of 3-dimensional automobile configuration", Trans. Korean Soc. Automot. Eng., 18(5), pp. 100-107 (2010).
29. Jeong, J. and Hussain, F. "On the identification of vortex", J. Fluid Mech., 285, pp. 69-94 (1995). 
Scientia Iranica
Volume 31, Issue 13 - Serial Number 13
Transactions on Mechanical Engineering (B)
July and August 2024
Pages 1077-1089

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 February 2022
  • Revise Date: 22 December 2022
  • Accept Date: 08 July 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics