Field and laboratory investigations of the effective contact surface between sleeper and ballast particles in railway tracks

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 School of Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Center of Excellence in Railway Transportation, School of Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Ballast is a porous layer that reduces the effective contact surface between sleeper and ballast. Also, the sleeper does not have a smooth bottom surface, which causes a reduction of the contact surface between the sleeper and ballast particles. At field experiments, by installing sensitive papers under the sleepers of a track, the cyclic load was imposed by passing trains, and after passing a certain amount of loads, the sensitive pressure paper was removed, and the contact surface was measured while in the laboratory investigation, the ballast box test was used to achieve a similar goal. The values obtained for the contact surface showed that the 200 kN axle load contact area is about 4.9% for concrete sleepers and about 8.1% for wooden sleepers, and this value increases with increasing axle load and load cycle. The average contact area for ballast type 1 was 4.6%, for ballast type 4 was 5.5%, and for the sample of ballast from the field test site was 5.3%. Two types of soft and stiff under sleeper pads (USP) were used. The results showed that the effective contact area between sleeper and ballast was 21.6% and 15.9% for soft and stiff USP, respectively.

Keywords

References

References:
1. Song, W., Huang, B., Shu, X., et al. "Interaction between railroad ballast and sleeper: a DEM-FEM approach", International Journal of Geomechanics, 19(5), pp. 15-32 (2019).
2. Abadi, T., Pen, L.L., Zervos, A., et al. "Effect of sleeper interventions on railway track performance", J. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 145(4), 04019009 (2019).
3. Navaratnarajah, S.K., Indraratna, B., and Ngo, N.T. "Influence of under sleeper pads on ballast behavior under cyclic loading: Experimental and numerical studies", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 144(9), 04018068-16 (2018).
4. Indraratna, B. and Salim, W., Mechanics of Ballasted Rail Tracks, a Geotechnical Perspective, 1st, Edition, London, UK, Taylor & Francis Group plc (2005). 5. Esveld, C., Modern Railway Track, 2nd Edition, MRTProductions, The Netherlands (2001).
6. Selig, E.T. and Waters, J.M., Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management, 1st Edition, Thomas Telford, London, UK (1994).
7. Lichtberger, B. "The lateral resistance of the track", (Part2), European Railway Review, pp. 68-71 (2007).
8. Talbot, A.N. "Stresses in railroad track", The Second Progress Report of the ASCE-AREA Special Committee on Stresses in Railroad Track, Reprinted, Published by the American Railway Engineering Association (AREA) (1919).
9. Guo, Y., Jia, W., Markine, V., et al. "Rheology study of ballast-sleeper interaction with Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Discrete Element Modelling (DEM)", Construction and Building Materials, 282(5), 122710 (2021).
10. Jing, G.Q., Aela, P., and Fu, H. "Numerical analysis of ballast-TDA mixture under cyclic loading", Proceedings of the Inaugural World Transport Convention Beijing, China, June 4-6 (2017).
11. Liu, S., Huang, H., Qiu, T., et al. "Comparison of laboratory testing using smart rock and discrete element modeling of ballast particle movement", Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29(3), p. 1061 (2017).
12. Ji, S., Sun, S., and Yan, Y. "Discrete element modeling of dynamic behaviors of railway ballast under cyclic loading with dilated polyhedral", Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech, 41(2), pp. 180-197 (2017).
13. Ferro, E., Harkness, J., and Le Pen, L.J.T.G. "The influence of sleeper material characteristics on railway track behaviour:concrete vs composite sleeper", Transportation Geotechnics, 23(6), 100348 (2020).
14. Guo, Y., Wang, J., Markine, V., et al. "Ballast mechanical performance with and without under sleeper pads", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(11), pp. 3202-3217 (2020).
15. Li, H. and McDowell, G.R. "Discrete element modelling of under sleeper pads using a box test", Granular Matter, 20(2), pp. 1-12 (2018).
16. Jayasuriya, C., Indraratna, B., and Ferreira, F.B. "The use of under sleeper pads to improve the performance of rail tracks", Indian Geotech Journal, 50(2), pp. 204- 212 (2020).
17. Zakeri, J.A. and Sadeghi, J. "Field investigation on load distribution and deflections of railway track sleepers", Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21(12), pp. 1948-1956 (2007).
18. Profillidis, V. and Poniridis, P. "The mechanical behavior of the sleeper-ballast interface", Computers & Structures, 24(3), pp. 437-441 (1986).
19. Henn, W. "Auswirkung von Oberbauform und Betriebsbelastung auf die Veranderung der Gleishohenlage", ARCH. EISENBAHNTECH., DEU, 33, pp. 51-64 (1978).
20. Sysyn, M., Przybylowicz, M., Nabochenko, O., et al. "Mechanism of sleeper-ballast dynamic impact and residual settlements accumulation in zones with unsupported sleepers", Sustainability, 13(14), p. 7740 (2021).
21. Jing, G., Aela, P., and Fu, H. "The contribution of ballast layer components to the lateral resistance of ladder sleeper track", Construction and Building Materials, 202(3), pp. 796-805 (2019).
22. Jing, G., Ji, Y., and Aela, P. "Experimental and numerical analysis of anchor-reinforced sleepers lateral resistance on ballasted track", Construction and Building Materials, 264(12), p. 120197 (2020).
23. De Iorio, A., Grasso, M., Penta, F., et al. "On the ballast-sleeper interaction in the longitudinal and lateral directions", Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit., 232(2), pp. 620-631 (2018).
24. Pucillo, G.P., Penta, F., Catena, M., et al. "On the lateral stability of the sleeper-ballast system", Procedia Structural Integrity, 12(1), pp. 553-560 (2018).
25. Ngamkhanong, C., Feng, B., Tutumluer, E., et al. "Evaluation of lateral stability of railway tracks due to ballast degradation", Construction and Building Materials, 278(4), p. 122342 (2021).
26. McHenry, M.T. "Pressure measurement at the ballasttie interface of railroad track using matrix based tactile surface sensors", University of Kentucky, Theses and Dissertations - Civil Engineering (2013).
27. Abadi, T., Le Pen, L., Zervos, A., et al. "Measuring the contact area and pressure between the ballast and the sleeper", The International Journal of Railway Technology, 4(2), pp. 45-72 (2015).
28. Sadeghi, J., Fundamentals of Analysis and Design of Railway Ballasted Track, 1st Edn., pp. 57-130, IUST press, Tehran, Iran (2018).
29. Fuji Film "Fuji film prescale pressure measurement film", Available: https://www.fujifilm.com/sg/en/ business/inspection/measurement-film/prescale/ feature (2018).
30. Refahiat Nikoo, H.R. "Field and laboratory investigation on the effective contact surface between sleeper and ballast particles in railway track", MSc Theses in Railway Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (2019).
31. Esmaeili, M., Aela, P., and Hosseini, A. "Experimental assessment of cyclic behavior of sand fouled ballast mixed with tire derived aggregates", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 98(7), pp. 1-11 (July, 2017).
32. Iranian Railway-Code 301, Railway Track Super Structure General Technical Specification, "Generaltechnical properties of ballasted railway track", Publications of the Organization of Management and Planning of the Country 84/00/67, p. 80 (2005).
33. British Standard Institution, British Standard Institution BS EN 13450:2002, Aggregates for railway ballast (2002).
34. British Standard Institution, British Standard Institution BS EN 933-5:1998, Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates. Part 5: Determination of percentage of crushed and broken surfaces in coarse aggregate particles (1998).
35. British Standard Institution, British Standard Institution BS EN 933-3:2012, Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates. Part 3: Determination of particle shape, Flakiness index (2012).
Scientia Iranica
Volume 30, Issue 6
Transactions on Civil Engineering (A)
November and December 2023
Pages 1911-1924

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 December 2021
  • Revise Date: 10 May 2022
  • Accept Date: 05 December 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics