Dynamic batch sentencing mechanisms for yield-based product acceptance determination with the simple linear profiles

Articles in Press

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

3 School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia

Abstract

Acceptance sampling plan has been extensively used in batch sentencing to provide the manufacturer and the customer a general benchmark to meet their predetermined needs on the batch quality. This paper develops a flexible sampling procedure, based on the SpkA index, for simple linear profiles by switching inspection rules. The plan parameters of the two suggested types of quick switching sampling (QSS) systems, satisfying the desirable quality levels and constraining the manufacturer’s and the customer’s risks, are derived by solving an optimization model. The comparisons between the suggested systems and the existing sampling plans are discussed, in terms of the discriminatory power and the average sample number to show the better performance of the suggested systems. Finally, the suggested QSS systems are applied in the electronics industry.

Keywords

References

  1. References

    1. Liu, S. W. and Wu, C. W. “Yield‐based variables repetitive group plan with a critical‐value‐adjusted mechanism”,Published online in Quality and Reliability Engineering International, doi: 10.1002/qre.3004 (2021).
    2. Fernández, A. J. “Explicit lot inspection by attributes using minimal prior information”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 148, 106743 (2020).
    3. Mahmood, Y., Fatima, S., Khan, H., et al. “Acceptance sampling plans based on Topp-Leone Gompertz distribution”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 159, 107526 (2021).
    4. Banihashemi, A., Fallah Nezhad, M. S., and Amiri, A.  “A new approach in the economic design of acceptance sampling plans based on process yield index and Taguchi loss function”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 159, 107155 (2021).
    5. Yang, C.M. and Chen, K.S. “An integrated contract manufacturer selection and product quality optimization methodology for the mechanical manufacturing industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 183, 115336 (2021).
    6. Lin, C. and Lin, P.Y. “A step-up approach for selecting substitute suppliers under nonlinear profile data”, Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 18(5), pp. 641–655 (2021).
    7. Woodall, W. H. “Current research on profile monitoring”, Production, 17(3), pp. 420-425 (2007). ‏
    8. Noorossana, R., Saghaei, A., and Amiri, A. “Statistical analysis of profile monitoring”, (Vol. 865). John Wiley & Sons (2011). 
    9. Maleki, M. R., Amiri, A., and Castagliola, P. “An overview on recent profile monitoring papers (2008–2018) based on conceptual classification scheme”,Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, pp. 705-728 (2018).
    10. Haq, A., Bibi, M., and Shah, B. A. “A novel approach to monitor simple linear profiles using individual observations”,Published online in Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, doi: 10.1080/03610918.2020.1799229 (2020).
    11. Riaz, M., Mahmood, T., Abbas, N., et al. “On improved monitoring of linear profiles under modified successive sampling”,Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 35(7), pp. 2202-2227 (2019).
    12. Ebadi, M. and Amiri, A. “Evaluation of process capability in multivariate simple linear profiles”, Scientia Iranica, 19(6), pp. 1960–1968 (2012).
    13. Ebadi, M. and Shahriari, H. “A process capability index for simple linear profile”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 64(5-8), pp. 857–865 (2013).
    14. Keshteli, R. N., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Amiri, A., et al.  “Developing functional process capability indices for simple linear profile”, Scientia Iranica, 21(3), pp. 1044-1050 (2014).
    15. Guevara, R. D., Vargas, J. A., and Castagliola, P. “Evaluation of process capability in non-linear profiles using Hausdorff distance”, Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 13(1), pp. 1–15 (2016).
    16. Ganji, Z. A. and Gildeh, B. S. “A new process capability index for simple linear profile”, Published online in Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, doi:10.1080/03610926.2021.1980804 (2021).
    17. Pakzad, A., Razavi, H., and Sadeghpour Gildeh, B. “Developing loss-based functional process capability indices for simple linear profile”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 92(1), pp. 115–144 (2021).
    18. Alevizakos, V., Koukouvinos, C., and Castagliola, P. “Process capability index for Poisson regression profile based on the Spmk index”, Quality Engineering, 31(3), pp. 430–438 (2018).
    19. Guevara G, R. D. and Alejandra López, T. “Process capability vector for multivariate nonlinear profiles”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 92(6), pp. 1292–1321 (2022).
    20. Wang, F.K. “A single sampling plan based on exponentially weighted moving average model for linear profiles”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(5), pp. 1795–1805 (2016).
    21. Wang, F. K. “The difference test statistic for two suppliers with linear profiles”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(1), pp. 69-78 (2016).
    22. Aslam, M., Azam, M., and Jun, C. H. “Determination of product acceptance for two suppliers with linear profiles”, Scientia Iranica, 28(4), pp. 2333-2341 (2021).
    23. Wang, F. K. “Variables sampling plan for resubmitted lots in a process with linear profiles”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(3), pp. 1029-1040 (2016).
    24. Aslam, M., Wang, F. K., Khan, N., et al. “A multiple dependent state repetitive sampling plan for linear profiles”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69 (3), pp. 467-473 (2017).
    25. Wang, F. K., Tamirat, Y., Lo, S. C., et al. “Dependent mixed and mixed repetitive sampling plans for linear profiles”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(8), pp. 1669-1683 (2017).
    26. Aslam, M. and Wang, F. K. “Acceptance sampling plans for linear profiles with one-sided specifications”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 87(4), pp. 806-816 (2017).
    27. Butt, K. A., Aslam, M., and Jun, C.H.  “Analysis of process yield in a cost-effective double acceptance sampling plan”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 49(24), pp. 5975–5987 (2020).
    28. Liu, S. W. and Wu, C. W. “A quick switching sampling system by variables for controlling lot fraction nonconforming”, International Journal of Production Research, 54(6), pp. 1839-1849 (2016).
    29. Wu, C. W., Liu, S. W., Chen, J. T., et al. “Design and construction of a variables switch-based sampling system for product acceptance determination”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 101(9-12), pp. 2643-2652 (2019).
    30. Balamurali, S. and Usha, M. “Determination of an efficient variables sampling system based on the Taguchi process capability index”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(3), pp. 420-432 (2019).
    31. Wu, C. W., Lee, A. H., Liu, S. W., et al. “Capability-based quick switching sampling system for lot disposition”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 52, pp. 131-144 (2017).
    32. Balamurali, S. and Usha, M.  “Developing and designing of an efficient sampling system based on process capability index”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 87(7), pp. 1401–1415 (2017).
    33. Banihashemi, A., Fallah Nezhad, M. S., and Amiri, A. “Developing process-yield-based acceptance sampling plans for AR(1) auto-correlated process”, Published online in Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, doi:10.1080/03610918.2021.1958845 (2021).
    34. Wang, Z.H., Wu, C.W., and Jhu, J.J. “Design and construction of a quick-switching sampling system with a third-generation capability index”, Published online in Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, doi:10.1080/03610926.2021.1977959 (2021).
    35. Wang, Z.H. and Wu, C.W. “Design and construction of a variables quick switching sampling system based on Taguchi capability index”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 160, 107582 (2021).
    36. Banihashemi, A., Fallah Nezhad, M. S., Amiri, A., et al. “Integrated QSS-RS plans based on the process yield index for lot acceptance determination”, Published online in Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, doi: 10.1080/03610926.2022.2065303 (2021).
    37. Wang, F. K. “A process yield for simple linear profiles”, Quality Engineering, 26(3), pp. 311-318 (2014).
    38. Govindaraju, K. and Kuralmani, V. “Modified tables for the selection of QSS–1 quick switching system for a given (AQL, LQL)”, Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 21(4), pp. 1103-1123 (1992).
    39. Soundararajan, V. and Arumainayagam, S. D. “Construction and selection of modified quick switching systems”, Journal of Applied Statistics, 17(1), pp. 83-114 (1990).
    40. Wu, C. W., Shu, M. H., and Liu, S. W. “A situationally sample‐size‐adjusted sampling scheme based on process yield verification”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(1), pp. 57-69 (2017).
    41. Amiri A., Zou, C., and Doroudyan, M.H. “Monitoring correlated profile and multivariate quality characteristics”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30, pp. 133–142 (2014).
Scientia Iranica

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 31 May 2022

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 January 2021
  • Revise Date: 19 April 2022
  • Accept Date: 31 May 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics