A dempster-shafer evidence theory for environmental risk assessment in failure modes and effects analysis of oil and gas exploitation plant

Document Type : Article

Authors

Faculty of Engineering, Shahrekord University, P.O. Box 115, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

The oil, gas, and petrochemical industries, as one of the largest sources of environmental pollutants, have different types and levels of pollution depending on the type of input materials, process steps, and output products. Various stages of exploration, extraction and processing of oil and gas have many environmental effects, such as those on soil, air, water, creatures, plants, and even humans. In this paper, a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is employed to identify failures and environmental risks in an oil and gas exploitation plant. Dempster–Shafer (DS) theory of evidence is then proposed for environmental risk assessment due to its effectiveness in dealing with uncertain and subjective information. The assesments of experts and their confidence levels of their responses are employed to construct the basic probability assignments (BPA) in DS theory of evidence. Furthermore, a new weighting method is proposed to obtain the discounted BPA which reduces the uncertainty in the information sources and improves the quality of information before combining different sources of information. Finally, the proposed method is applied to an oil and gas exploitation plant to assess environmental risks.

Keywords

References

References:
1. Shaluf, I. M. and Abdullah, S.A. "Floating roof storage tank boilover", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(1), pp. 1-7 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.06.007.
2. Hocaoglu, S.M., Gursoy Haksevenler, B.H., Pamir Talazana, P., et al. "Assessment of technology modification for olive oil sector through mass balance: A case study for Turkey", Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, pp. 786-795 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.020.
3. Seyedhoseini, S.M. and Hatefi, M.A. "Two-Pillar Risk Management (TPRM): A generic project risk management process", Scientia Iranica, 16(2), pp. 138-148 (2009).
4. Rostamzadeh, R., Ghorabaee, M.K., Govindan, K., et al. "Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS- CRITIC approach", Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, pp. 651-669 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.071.
5. Valinejad, F. and Rahmani, D. "Sustainability risk management in the supply chain of telecommunication companies: A case study", Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, pp. 53-67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.174.
6. Naderpour, A., Majrouhi Sardroud, J., Mofid, M., et al. "Uncertainty management in time estimation of construction projects: A systematic literature review and new model development", Scientia Iranica, 26(2), pp. 752-778 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4605.
7. Afshari, H., Issa, M.H., and Radvan, A. "Using failure mode and effects analysis to evaluate barriers to the greening of existing buildings using the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design rating system", Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, pp. 195-203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.140.
8. Hatefi, S.M. and Tamosaitiene, J. "An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model for evaluating construction projects by considering interrelationships among risk factors", Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(2), pp. 114-131 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.8280.
9. Chang, J.I. and Lin, C.C. "A study of storage tank accidents", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(1), pp. 51-59 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.015.
10. Wang, D., Zhang, P., and Chen, L. "Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(6), pp. 1390-1398 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.08.022.
11. Ardeshir, A., Mohajeri, M., and Amiri, M. "Evaluation of safety risks in construction using fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis (FFMEA)", Scientia Iranica, 23(6), pp. 2546-2556 (2016). https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2016.2313.
12. Arabsheybani, A., Paydar, M.M., and Safaei, A.S. "An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier's risk", Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, pp. 577-591 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.167.
13. Chen, L. and Deng, Y. "A new failure mode and effects analysis model using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory and grey relational projection method", Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 76, pp. 13-20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.08.010.
14. Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., Kwai Poon, G.K., et al. "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean", Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2, Part 1), pp. 1195-1207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028.
15. Kutlu, A.C. and Ekmekcioglu, M. "Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSISbased fuzzy AHP", Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), pp. 61-67 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044.
16. Dagsuyu, C., Gocmen, E., Narl, M., et al. "Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit", Computers and Industrial Engineering, 101, pp. 286- 294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.015.
17. Zhou, Q. and Thai, V.V. "Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction", Safety Science, 83, pp. 74-79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.013.
18. Rafie, M., and Samimi Namin, F. "Prediction of subsidence risk by FMEA using artificial neural network and fuzzy inference system", International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 25(4), pp. 655-663 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.05.021.
19. Ilbahar, E., Karasan, A., Cebi, S., and Kahraman, C. "A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy inference system", Safety Science, 103, pp. 124- 136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025.
20. Jaderi, F., Ibrahim, Z.Z., and Zahiri, M.R. "Criticality analysis of petrochemical assets using risk based maintenance and the fuzzy inference system", Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 121, pp. 312- 325 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.005.
21. Fei, L., Deng, Y., and Hu, Y. "DS-VIKOR: A new multi-criteria decision-making method for supplier selection", International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21(1), pp. 157-175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0543-y.
22. Qiu, G.Q., Huang, S., Zhu, L.L., et al. "Risk assessment of multi-state Bayesian metwork in an oil gathering and transferring system", Procedia Engineering, 130, pp. 1514-1523 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.320.
23. Barua, S., Gao, X., Pasman, H., et al. "Bayesian network based dynamic operational risk assessment", Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 41, pp. 399-410 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.11.024.
24. Alauddin, M., Khan, F., Imtiaz, S., et al. "A probabilistic risk assessment of offshore aring systems using bayesian network", Advances in Industrial Safety, Singapore, Springer Singapore (2020). https://doi.org /10.1007/978-981-15-6852-7 10.
25. Lan, M., Zhu, J., and Lo, S. "Hybrid Bayesian network-based landslide risk assessment method for modeling risk for industrial facilities subjected to landslides", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 215, p. 107851 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107851.
26. Hatefi, S.M., Basiri, M.E., Tamosaitiene, J. "An evidential model for environmental risk assessment in projects using dempster-shafer theory of evidence", Sustainability, 11, p. 6329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226329.
27. Hatefi, S.M., Asadi, H., Shams, G., et al. "Model for the Sustainable Material Selection by Applying Integrated Dempster-Shafer Evidence Theory and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method", Sustainability, 13(18), p. 10438 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810438.
28. Liu, P. and Zhang, X. "Approach to multi-attributes decision making with intuitionistic linguistic information based on dempster-shafer evidence theory", IEEE Access, 6, pp. 52969-52981 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869844.
29. Liu, P. and Gao, H. "Some intuitionistic fuzzy power Bonferroni mean operators in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory and their application to multicriteria decision making", Applied Soft Computing, 85, 105790 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105790.
30. Liu, P. and Zhang, X. "A new hesitant fuzzy linguistic approach for multiple attribute decision making based on Dempster-Shafer evidence theory", Applied Soft Computing, 86, p. 105897 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105897.
31. Liu, P., Liu, X., Ma, G., et al. "A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory", International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 19(02), pp. 499-524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622020500042.
32. Liu, P., Shen, M., Teng, F., et al. "Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy-based TODIM approach using evidential theory", Information Sciences, 547, pp. 223-243 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.07.062.
33. Liu, P., Zhang, X., and Pedrycz, W. "A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy linguistic group decisionmaking in the framework of dempster-shafer evidence theory", Knowledge-Based Systems, 212, 106559 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106559.
34. Yang, J., Huang, H.Z., He, L.P., et al. "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster- Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty", Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(8), pp. 2084-2092 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.06.014.
35. Su, X., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S., et al. "An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades", Engineering Failure Analysis, 26, pp. 164-174 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.07.009.
36. Jiang, W., Xie, C., Zhuang, M., et al. "Failure mode and effects analysis based on a novel fuzzy evidential method", Applied Soft Computing, 57, pp. 672-683 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.008.
37. Certa, A., Hopps, F., Inghilleri, R., et al. "A Dempster- Shafer Theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 159, pp. 69-79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.018.
38. Yousefi, S., Alizadeh, A., Hayati, J., et al. "HSE risk prioritization using robust DEA-FMEA approach with undesirable outputs: A study of automotive parts industry in Iran", Safety Science, 102, pp. 144-158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.015.
39. Dempster, A.P. "Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping", Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38(4), pp. 325-339 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177698950.
40. Shafer, G., A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10vm1qb.
41. Deng, Y. "Deng entropy", Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 91, pp. 549-553 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.07.014.
42. Shannon, E.C. "A mathematical theory of communication", Bell Systems Technical Journal, 27(3), pp. 379-423 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538- 7305.1948.tb01338.x.
43. Zhou, D., Tang, Y., and Jiang, W. "A modified belief entropy in Dempster-Shafer framework", PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0176832 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176832.
44. Liu, W. "Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions", Artificial Intelligence, 170(11), pp. 909- 924 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2006.05.002.
45. Xiao, N., Huang, H.Z., Li, Y., et al. "Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA", Engineering Failure Analysis, 18, pp. 1162-1170 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.02.004.
Scientia Iranica
Volume 31, Issue 18
Transactions on Industrial Engineering (E)
November and December 2024
Pages 1674-1690

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 11 June 2020
  • Revise Date: 18 December 2021
  • Accept Date: 24 January 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics