Impact of measurement error on maximum hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart

Articles in Press

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore Campus, Pakistan

2 Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Islamabad, Pakistan

3 National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, Pakistan

4 Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

Abstract

Statistical process control provides various types of control charts for monitoring of mean and variance shifts in the industrial production process individually as well as jointly to improve and maintain the quality products. The authors proposed these control charts based on sample values selected to calculate the desired statistics assuming that these values are measured correctly. But in a real life situation, measurements of the values may suffer from errors ultimately affecting the efficiency of the control charts. A few of the researchers in the field of control charts also discussed the problem of measurement error during process monitoring and proposed solutions to avoid losses of producers. We also present a hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart for joint monitoring of mean as well as variance and study the effect of measurement error on the efficiency of this control chart and name it as Max-HEWMAME control chart. The impact of measurement error has been shown in the calculations and presented in the shape of average run lengths ( ) and standard deviations of run lengths ( ) using the Monte Carlo simulation method. A real life example is also included to support the simulation results.

Keywords

References

  1. References

    1. Page, E.S. “Continuous inspection schemes", Biometrika, 41(1-2), pp. 100-115 (1954).
    2. Roberts, S.W. “Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages", Technometrics, 1(3), pp. 239-250 (1959).
    3. Lucas, J. M., and Saccucci, M. S. “Exponentially weighted moving average control chemes: properties and enhancements”, Technometrics, 32(1), pp. 1-12 (1990).
    4. Chen, G., Cheng, S. W., and Xie, H. “Monitoring process mean and variability with one EWMA chart”, Journal of Quality Technology, 33, pp. 223-233 (2001).
    5. Zhang, L., and Chen, G. “An extended EWMA mean chart”, Quality Technology Quantity Management, 2, pp. 39-52 (2005).
    6. Khoo, M. B. C., Teh, S. Y., and Wu, Z. “Monitoring process mean and variability with one double EWMA chart”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 39, pp. 3678-3694 (2010).
    7. Abbas, N., Riaz, M., and Does, R. J. M. M. “An EWMA-type control chart for monitoring the process mean using auxiliary information”, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 43(16), pp. 3485-3498 (2014).
    8. Abujiya,R., Lee, M.H., and Riaz, M. “New EWMA S2 control charts for monitoring process dispersion", Scientia Iranica, 24(1), pp. 378-389 (2017).
    9. Haq, A. “A new maximum EWMA control chart for simultaneously monitoring process mean and dispersion using auxiliary information”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(7), pp. 1577-1587 (2017).
    10. Ajadi, J.O., and Riaz, M. “New memory-type control charts for monitoring process mean and dispersion”, Scientia Iranica, 24(6), pp. 3423-3438 (2017).
    11. Noor-ul-Amin, M., Khan, S., and Aslam, M. “An EWMA control chart using two parametric ratio estimator”, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 35(5), pp. 298-308 (2018).
    12. Hussain, S., Song, L., Ahmad, S., and Riaz, M. “On auxiliary information based improved EWMA median control charts”, Scientia Iranica, 25(2), pp. 954-982 (2018).
    13. Tayyab, M., Noor-ul-Amin, M., and Hanif, M. “Exponential weighted moving average control charts for monitoring the process mean using pair ranked set sampling schemes”, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Sciences, 43(4), pp. 1941-1950 (2019).
    14. Awais, M., and Haq, A. “New Shewhart-EWMA and Shewhart-CUSUM control charts for monitoring process mean”, Scientia Iranica, 26(6), pp. 3796-3818 (2019).
    15. Raza, M.A., Nawaz, T., and Aslam, M. “On designing CUSUM charts using ratio-type estimators for monitoring the location of normal processes”, Scientia Iranica, 27(3), pp. 1593-1605 (2020).
    16. Bennet, C. A. “Effect of measurement error on chemical process control”, Industrial Quality Control, 10(4), pp. 17-20 (1954).
    17. Mittag, H. J., and Stemann, D. “Gauge imprecision effect on the performance of the control chart”, Journal of Applied Statistics, 25(3), pp. 307-317 (1998).
    18. Montgomery, D. C., and Runger, G. C. “Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part I: basic methods”, Quality Engineering, 6(1), pp. 115-135 (1993).
    19. Sanders, F. F. “Handling process disturbances and measurement errors”, ISA Transactions, 34, pp. 165-173 (1995).
    20. Linna, K. W., and Woodall, W. H. “Effect of measurement error on Shewhart control charts”, Journal of Quality Technology, 33(2), pp. 213-222 (2001).
    21. Maravelakis, P., Panaretos, J., and Psarakis, S. “EWMA chart and measurement error”. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(4), pp. 445-455 (2004).
    22. Huwang, L., and Hung, Y. “Effect of measurement error on monitoring multivariate process variability”, Statistica Sinica, 17, pp. 749-790 (2007).
    23. Li, J., and Huang, S. “Regression-based process monitoring with consideration of measurement errors”, IIE Transaction, 42(2), pp. 146-160 (2009).
    24. Wu, C. W. “Using a novel approach to assess process performance in the presence of measurement errors”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 81(3), pp. 301-314 (2011).
    25. Maravelakis, P. E. “Measurement error effect on the CUSUM control chart”, Journal of Applied Statistics, 39(2), pp. 323-336 (2012).
    26. Khurshid, A., and Chakraborty, A. B. “Measurement error effect on the power of the control chart for zero-truncated binomial distribution under standardization procedure”, International Journal of Quality Research, 8(4), pp. 495-504 (2014).
    27. Hu, X., Castagliola, P., Sun, J., and Khoo, M. B. C. “The effect of measurement errors on the synthetic chart”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(8), pp. 1769-1778 (2015).
    28. Baral, A. K., and Anis, M. Z. “Assessment of in the presence of measurement errors”, Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 14(1), pp. 13-27 (2015).
    29. Tran, K. P., Castagliola, P., and Celano, G. “The performance of the Shewhart-RZ control chart in the presence of measurement error”, International Journal of Production Research, 54(24), pp. 7504-7522 (2016).
    30. Ghashghaei, R., Bashiri, M., Amiri, A., and Maleki, M. R. “Effect of measurement error on joint monitoring of process mean and variability under ranked set sampling”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(8), pp. 3035-3050 (2016).
    31. Unnati, B., and Raj, S. J. “The effect of measurement error on the power of charts with known coefficient of variation”, International Journal of Scientific Research in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, 4(5), pp. 33-39 (2017).
    32. Daryabari, S. A., Hashemian, S. M., Keyvandarian, A., and Maryam, S. A. “The effects of measurement error on the MAX EWMAMS control chart”, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 46(12), pp. 5766-5778 (2017).
    33. Sabahno, H., and Amiri, A. “The effect of measurement error on the performance of variable sample size and sampling interval control chart”, IJE Transactions A: Basics, 30(7), pp. 995-1004 (2017).
    34. Maleki, M. R., and Salmasnia, A. “Joint monitoring of process location and dispersion based on CUSUM procedure and generalized likelihood ratio in the presence of measurement error”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(7), pp. 1485-1498 (2017).
    35. Cheng, X. B., and Wang, F. K. “The performance of EWMA median and CUSUM median control charts for a normal process with measurement errors”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 34, pp. 203–2013 (2018).
    36. Tang, A., Castagliola, P., Sun, J. S., and Hu, X. L. “The effect of measurement error on the adaptive EWMA chart”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 34(4), pp. 609-630 (2018).
    37. Asif, F., Khan, S., and Noor-ul-Amin, M. “Hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart with measurement error”, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transections A: Science, 44, pp. 801-811 (2020). 
    38. Arif, F., Noor-ul-Amin, M., and Hanif, M. “Joint monitoring of mean and variance using likelihood ratio test statistic with measurement error”, Quality Technology & Quantitative Management,18(2),202-224 (2021.
    39. Haq, A. “A new hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process mean", Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 29, pp. 1015-1025 (2013).
    40. Azam, M., Aslam, M., and Jun, C. H. “Designing of a hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart using repetitive sampling”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(9-12), pp. 1927-1933 (2015).
    41. Haq, A. “A new hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process mean, discussion”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(7), pp. 1629-1631 (2017a).
    42. Noor-ul-Amin, M., Khan, S., and Sanaullah, A. “HEWMA control chart using auxiliary information”, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science, 43(3), pp. 891-903 (2019).
    43. Javaid, A., Noor-ul-Amin, M., and Hanif, M. “A new Max-HEWMA control chart using auxiliary information”, Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 49(5), pp. 1285-1305 (2020).
    44. Noor-ul-Amin, M., Shabbir, N., Khan, N., and Riaz, A. “Hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart for mean by using different ranked set sampling schemes”, Kuwait Journal of Science, 47(4), pp. 19-28 (2020).
    45. Montgomery, D.C., Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 6th Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York (2009).
Scientia Iranica

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 15 November 2021

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 February 2021
  • Revise Date: 08 August 2021
  • Accept Date: 14 November 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics