Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy variation coefficient similarity measures and their approach to medical diagnosis and pattern recognition

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 - School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250015, Shandong Province, China - School of Economics and Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, 300300, China

2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract

The q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS) as a generalization of fuzzy set (FS), is characterized by membership and non-membership, and the sum of their q-powers is restricted to [0,1]. In this manuscript, a new Complex q-rung orthoapir fuzzy set (Cq-ROFS) is proposed by combining q-ROFS and complex fuzzy set (CFS). Cq-ROFS is a better way to process uncertain and imprecise information in decision making, which is characterized by complex-valued membership and complex-valued non-membership. First, some fundamental operational laws, score function and accuracy function, and comparison method are proposed. Further, because the vector similarity measures (VSMs) play a key role in statistics, physics and engineering sciences, some VSMs called Jaccard similarity measures (JSMs), dice similarity measures (DSMs) and cosine similarity measures (CSMs) for Cq-ROFSs and interval-valued complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (IVCq-ROFSs) are investigated. Moreover, the hybrid vector similarity measures (HVSMs) called variation co-efficient similarity measures (VCSMs) for Cq-ROFSs and IVCq-ROFSs are also proposed and their properties are discussed. Finally, in order to demonstrate the feasibility of the investigated HVSMs, the existing similarity measures about complex Pythagorean fuzzy sets (CPFSs) and complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets (CIFSs) are compared with the proposed methods by numerical examples of medical diagnosis and pattern recognition.

Keywords


References:
[1] Atanassov, K.T. “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, In Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Physica, Heidelberg. Pp. 1-137 (1999).
[2] Zadeh, L. A.  “Fuzzy sets”, Information and control, 8(3), pp. 338-353 (1965).
[3] Hung, W. L. & Yang, M. S. “Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance”, Pattern Recognition Letters, 25(14), pp. 1603-1611 (2004).
[4] Xu, Z.  & Xia, M. “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets”, Information Sciences, 181(11), pp. 2128-2138 (2011).
[5] Xu, Z.  &Chen, J. “An overview of distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 16(04), pp. 529-555 (2008).
[6] Szmidt, E. & Kacprzyk, J. “Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy sets and systems, 118(3), pp. 467-477 (2001).
[7] Burillo, P. & Bustince, H. “Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy sets and systems, 78(3), pp. 305-316 (1996).
[8] Hung, W.L. & Yang, M.S. “Fuzzy entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21(4), pp. 443-451 (2006).
[9] De, S.K., Biswas, R. & Roy, A. “An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis”, Fuzzy sets and Systems, 117(2), pp. 209-213 (2001).
[10] Szmidt, E. & Kacprzyk, J. “A similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in supporting medical diagnostic reasoning”, In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, Zakopane, Poland, pp. 388-393 (2004).
[11] Szmidt, E. & Kacprzyk, J.  “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in some medical applications”, In International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Dortmund, Germany, pp. 148-151 (2001).
[12] Wei, G. “Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making”, Applied soft computing, 10(2), pp. 423-431 (2010).
[13] Xu, Z.  “Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(6), pp. 749-760 (2011).
[14] Liu, P. “Some Hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy systems, 22(1), pp. 83-97 (2013).
[15]Alkouri, A.M. & Salleh, A. R. “Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, In AIP Conference Proceedings, Puertollano, Spain, 1482(1), pp. 464-470 (2012).
[16] Ramot, D., Milo, R., Friedman, M. & Kandel, A. “Complex fuzzy sets”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10(2), pp. 171-186 (2002).
[17] Kumar, T. &Bajaj, R.K. “On complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with distance measures and entropies”, Journal of Mathematics, 2014, pp. 1-12, Article ID 972198 (2014).
[18] Maji, P. K., Biswas, R. & Roy, A. “Soft set theory”, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 45(4-5), pp. 555-562 (2003).
[19] Alkouri, A.U. M. &Salleh, A. R.  “Complex atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy relation”, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013, pp. 1-18, Article ID 287382 (2013).
[20] Rani, D.  & Garg, H.  “Distance measures between the complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to the decision-making process”, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 7(5), pp. 423-439 (2017).
[21] Rani, D. & Garg, H. “Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multicriteria decision‐making”, Expert Systems, 35(6), pp. e12325 (2018).
[22] Garg, H. & Rani, D. “Some generalized complex intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multicriteria decision-making process”, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44(3), pp. 2679-2698 (2019).
[23] Garg, H. & Rani, D. “A robust correlation coefficient measure of complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications in decision-making”, Applied Intelligence, 49(2), pp. 496-512 (2019).
[24] Yager, R.R. “Pythagorean fuzzy subsets”, In 2013 joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), Edmonton, Canada, pp. 57-61 (2013).
[25]Yager, R.R. & Abbasov, A.M. “Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(5), pp. 436-452 (2013).
[26] Ullah, K., Mahmood, T., Ali, Z. & Jan, N.  “On some distance measures of complex Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition”, Complex & Intelligent Systems, 6, pp.15–27 (2020).
[27] Yager, R. R.  “Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), pp. 1222-1230 (2016).
[28] Liu, Z., Liu, P. & Liang, X. “Multiple attribute decision‐making method for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes and unknown attribute weight information under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(9), pp. 1900-1928 (2018).
[29] Liu, Z., Wang, S. &Liu, P.  “Multiple attribute group decision making based on q‐rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(12), pp. 2341-2363 (2018).
[30] Wang, P., Wang, J., Wei, G. & Wei, C. “Similarity measures of q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets based on cosine function and their applications”, Mathematics, 7(4), pp. 340 (2019).
[31] Jan, N., Mahmood, T., Zedam, L., Ullah, K., Alcantud, J.C.R. & Davvaz, B. “Analysis of Social Networks, Communication Networks and Shortest Path Problems in the Environment of Interval-Valued q-Rung Ortho Pair Fuzzy Graphs”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21, pp.1687–1708 (2019).
[32] Liu, P. & Liu, J. “Some q‐rung orthopai fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi‐attribute group decision making”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(2), pp. 315-347 (2018).
[33] Liu, P. & Wang, P. “Some q‐rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple‐attribute decision making”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(2), pp. 259-280 (2018).
[34] Liu, P. & Wang, P. “Multiple-attribute decision-making based on Archimedean Bonferroni Operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers”, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy systems, 27(5), pp. 834-848 (2018).
[35] Peng, X., Dai,  J. & Garg, H. “Exponential operation and aggregation operator for q‐rung orthopair fuzzy set and their decision‐making method with a new score function”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(11), pp. 2255-2282 (2018).
[36] Liu, P., Chen, S.M. & Wang, P. “Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy power maclaurin symmetric mean operators”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems (2018), DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2852948.
[37] Yang, W.  & Pang, Y. “New q-rung orthopair fuzzy partitioned Bonferroni mean operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(3), pp. 439-476 (2019).
[38] Li, L., Zhang, R. & Shang, X. “Some q-rung orthopair linguistic Heronian meanoperators with their application to multi-attribute groupdecision making”, Archives of Control Sciences, 28 (4), pp. 551-583 (2018).
[39] Liu, P.  & Liu, W. “Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on power Bonferroni operators of linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(4), pp. 652-689 (2019).
[40] Li, D.F. & Cheng, C.T. “New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions”, Pattern recognition letters, 23(1-3), pp. 221-225 (2002).
[41] Mitchell, H.B. “On the Dengfeng–Chuntian similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition”, Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(16), pp. 3101-3104 (2003).
[42] Castellano, G.,  Fanelli,  A.M. Mencar, C. & Torsello, M. A. “Similarity-based fuzzy clustering for user profiling”, In 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology-Workshops, California, United States, pp. 75-78 (2007).
[43] Son, L.H. “Generalized picture distance measure and applications to picture fuzzy clustering”, Applied Soft Computing, 46, pp. 284-295 (2016).
[44] He, Q.  & Wu, C. “Membership evaluation and feature selection for fuzzy support vector machine based on fuzzy rough sets”, Soft computing, 15(6), pp. 1105-1114 (2011).
[45] Liu, P. & Jin, F. “A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on weighted geometric aggregation operators of interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36(6), pp. 2498-2509 (2012).
[46] Liu, P., Zhang, X. & Jin, F. “A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers hybrid harmonic averaging operators”, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 23(5), pp. 159-168 (2012).
[47] Du, W.S. “Minkowski-type distance measures for generalized orthopair fuzzy sets”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(4), pp. 802-817 (2018).
[48] Peng, X. & Dai, J. “Research on the assessment of classroom teaching quality with q‐rung orthopair fuzzy information based on multiparametric similarity measure and combinative distance-based assessment”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34, pp. 1588-1630 (2019).
[49] Joshi, B.P., Singh, A., Bhatt, P.K. & Vaisla, K.S. “Interval valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and their properties”, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(3), pp. 5225-5230 (2018).
[50] Jaccard, P. “Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines”, Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat, 37, pp. 241-272 (1901).
[51] Dice, L. R. “Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species”, Ecology, 26(3), pp. 297-302 (1945).
[52] Salton, G.  & McGill, M. J. Introduction to modern information retrieval. mcgraw-hill. (1983).
[53] Xu, X., Zhang, L. & Wan, Q. “A variation coefficient similarity measure and its application in emergency group decision-making”, Systems Engineering Procedia, 5, pp. 119-124 (2012).
[54] Pramanik, S., Biswas, P.  & Giri, B. C. “Hybrid vector similarity measures and their applications to multi-attribute decision making under neutrosophic environment”, Neural computing and Applications, 28(5), pp. 1163-1176 (2017).
[55] Wei, G. & Wei, Y. “Similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applications”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(3), pp. 634-652 (2018).
[56] Zhang, X. “A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(6), pp. 593-611 (2016).
[57] Liu, P. & You, X. “Linguistic neutrosophic partitioned Maclaurin symmetric mean operators based on clustering algorithm and their application to multi-criteria group decision making”, Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(3), pp. 2131-2170 (2020).
[58] Liu, P. & Li, Y. “Multi-attribute decision making method based on generalized maclaurin symmetric mean aggregation operators for probabilistic linguistic information”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 131, pp. 282-294 (2019).
[59] Liu, P. & Zhang, X. “Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach with Linguistic D Numbers Based on Choquet Integral”, Cognitive Computation, 11(4), pp. 560-575 (2019).
[60] Liu, P., Gao, H. & Ma, J. “Novel green supplier selection method by combining quality function deployment with partitioned Bonferroni mean operator in interval type-2 fuzzy environment”, Information Sciences,  490, pp. 292-316 (2019).
[61] Liu, P., Zhu, B., Wang, P., & Shen, M. “An Approach Based on Linguistic Spherical Fuzzy Sets for Public Evaluation of Shared Bicycles in China”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 87, pp. 103295 (2020).
[62] Liu, P. & Wang, Y. “Multiple attribute decision making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized Maclaurin symmetic mean operators”, Information Sciences, 518, pp. 181-210 (2020).
[63] Liu, P. & Liu, X. “A multi-attribute decision making method based on the third generation prospect theory and grey correlation degree”, Scientia Iranica, (2020), In press.
[64] Liu, P. & Liu, W. “Bonferroni harmonic mean operators based on two-dimensional uncertain linguistic information and their applications in land utilization ratio evaluation”, Scientia Iranica,26 (2), pp. 975-995 (2019).
Volume 29, Issue 2
Transactions on Industrial Engineering (E)
March and April 2022
Pages 894-914
  • Receive Date: 30 December 2019
  • Revise Date: 03 March 2020
  • Accept Date: 01 June 2020