Electricity market assessment in wind energy integrated power systems with the potential of flexibility: A boundary condition approach

Document Type : Article


School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


This paper focuses on a dynamic equilibrium considering the flexible ramp market and demand response resources. With ever-swelling installation of variable renewable energies, demand response programs can play an important role in mitigating the system ramping deficiency. Hence in this paper, the ramping capability of demand response resources in procuring system ramp requirement is considered. The strategic behavior of different players is modeled through a multi-leader-common-follower game, in which suppliers and demand response aggregators are laid as the leaders and market operator is considered as the single follower of the game. In addition, a dynamic forward rolling process to find equilibria at the real-time market is proposed. The effect of considering demand response resources and flexible ramp penalty price on the strategic behavior of players in equilibrium is evaluated. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed approach is verified on a three-firm system. While revealing demand response resources roles in mitigating ramping deficiency, the results show that how penalty price on flexible ramp violation can lead uplift payments to be formed.


[1] Navid, N. and Rosenwald, G. “Ramp capability product design for MISO markets”, MISO, Market Development and Analysis (2013).
[2] Abdul-Rahman, K. H., Alarian, H., Rothleder, M., et al. “Enhanced system reliability using flexible ramp constraint in CAISO market”, Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meeting, San Diego, USA, pp.1-6 (2012).
[3] Srinivasan, D., Trung, L.T., and Singh, C. “Bidding and Cooperation Strategies for Electricity Buyers in Power Markets”, IEEE Syst. J., 10(2), pp. 422-433 (2016).
[4] Klemperer, P.D. and Meyer, M.A. “Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty”, Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc., pp. 1243-1277 (1989).
[5] Anderson, E.J. and Hu, X. “Finding Supply Function Equilibria with Asymmetric Firms”, Operations research, 56(3), pp. 697-711 (2008).
[6] Azadi, A. and Akbari Foroud, A. “A New Solution Approach for Supply Function Equilibrium-based Bidding Strategy in Electricity Markets”, Scientia Iranica, vol. 24(6), pp. 3231-3246 (2017).
[7] Rahimiyan, M. and Baringo, L. “Strategic Bidding for a Virtual Power Plant in the Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets: A Price-Taker Robust Optimization Approach”, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 31(4), pp. 2676-2687 (2016).
[8] Xu, Z., Hu, Z., Song, Y., and et al. “Risk-Averse Optimal Bidding Strategy for Demand-Side Resource Aggregators in Day-Ahead Electricity Markets under Uncertainty”, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 8(1), 96-105 (2017).
[9] Ladjici, A.A., Tiguercha, A., and Boudour, M. “Nash Equilibrium in a Two-settlement Electricity Market Using Competitive Co-evolutionary Algorithms”, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 57, p. 148-55 (2014).
[10] Nezamabadi, N. and Vahidinasab, V. “Microgrids Bidding Strategy in a Transactive Energy Market”, Scientia Iranica, (in press).
[11] Bashi, MH., Yousefi GR., Latify, MA., and et al. “Impacts of Intraday Risky Power Trades on the High Wind Penetrated Electricity Markets”, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib, 13(17), pp. 3836-3846 (2019).
[12] Ruiz, C., Conejo, A.J., and Smeers, Y. “Equilibria in an Oligopolistic Electricity Pool with Stepwise Offer Curves”, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 27(2), pp. 752-761 (2012).
[13] Cornelius, A. “Assessing the impact of flexible ramp capability products in the Midcontinent ISO”, Master's thesis, Duke University (2014).
[14] Bashi, MH., Gharibpour, H., Rahmati, I., and et al. “Including the Constraints That Have Less Than One-Hour Characteristcis in an Hourly Based Generation Scheduling Regime”, IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, pp. 1-4 (2018).
[15] Doostizadeh, M., Aminifar, F., Ghasemi, and et al. “Energy and Reserve Scheduling under Wind Power Uncertainty: An Adjustable Interval Approach”, IEEE Trans. on Smart Grid, 7(6), pp. 2943-2952 (2016).
[16] Zou, P., Chen, Q., Wang, J., and et al. “Evaluating the Impacts of Flexible Ramping Products on the Market Equilibrium”, IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meeting, San Diego, Boston, USA (2016).
[17] AEMO. “Integrating Renewable Energy–Wind Integration Studies Report”, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 3-21 (2013).
[18] Chen, R., Wang, J., Botterud, A., and et al. “Wind Power Providing Flexible Ramp Product”, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 32(3), pp. 2049-2061 (2017).
[19] Cui, M., Zhang, J., Wu, H., and et al. “Wind-Friendly Flexible Ramping Product Design in Multi-Timescale Power System Operations”, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 8(3), pp. 1064-1075 (2017).
[20] Heydarian-Forushani, E., Golshan, M.E.H., Shafie-khah, M., and et al. “Optimal Operation of Emerging Flexible Resources Considering Sub-Hourly Flexible Ramp Product”, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 9(2), pp. 916-929 (2018).
[21] Fang, X., Krishnan, V., and Hodge, B.-M. “Strategic Offering for Wind Power Producers Considering Energy and Flexible Ramping Products”, Energies, 11(5), p. 1239 (2018).
[22] Gharibpour, H. and Aminifar, F. “Multi-stage Equilibrium in Electricity Pool with Flexible Ramp Market”, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 109, p. 661-671 (2019).
[23] Chen, Q., Zou, P., Wu, C., and et al. “A Nash-Cournot Approach to Assessing Flexible Ramping Products”, Appl. Energy, 206, p. 42-50 (2017).
[24] https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/dsm/
[25] York, D. and Kushler, M. “Exploring the Relationship between Demand Response and Energy Efficiency: A Review of Experience and Discussion of Key Issues”, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (2005)
[26] Roozbehani, M., Dahleh, M., and Mitter, S. “Dynamic Pricing and Stabilization of Supply and Demand in Modern Electric Power Grids”, IEEE Intl. Conf. Smart Grid Commun., Gaithersburg, USA (2010).
[27] Tulabing, R., Yin, R., DeForest, N., and et al. “Modeling Study on Flexible Load's Demand Response Potentials for Providing Ancillary Services at the Substation Level”, Electric Power Systs. Research, 140, pp. 240-252 (2016).
[28] FERC. “Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering”, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2006).
[29] Aalami, H., Moghaddam, M.P., and Yousefi, G. “Demand Response Modeling Considering Interruptible/Curtailable Loads and Capacity Market Programs”, Appl. Energy, 87(1), pp. 243-250 (2010).
[30] Hu, J., Wen, F., Wang, K., and et al. “Simultaneous Provision of Flexible Ramping Product and Demand Relief by Interruptible Loads Considering Economic Incentives”, Energies, 11(1), pp. 46 (2017).
[31] Helistö, N., Kiviluoma, J., and Holttinen, H. “Long-Term Impact of Variable Generation and Demand Side Flexibility on Thermal Power Generation”, IET Renew. Power Gener., 12(6), pp. 718-726 (2018).
[32] Hu, J., Sarker, M.R., Wang, J., and et al. “Provision of Flexible Ramping Product by Battery Energy Storage in Day-Ahead Energy and Reserve Markets”, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 12(10), pp. 2256-2264 (2018).
[33] Nikoobakht, A., Aghaei, J., Shafie-khah, M., and et al. “Assessing Increased Flexibility of Energy Storage and Demand Response to Accommodate a High Penetration of Renewable Energy Sources”, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, in press (2018).
[34] Mohammadi, J., Rahimi-Kian, A., and Ghazizadeh, M.-S. “Aggregated Wind Power and Flexible Load Offering Strategy”, IET Renew. Power Gener., 5(6), pp. 439-447 (2011).
[35] Klobasa, M. “Analysis of Demand Response and Wind Integration in Germany's Electricity Market”, IET Renew. Power Gener., 4(1), pp. 55-63 (2010).
[36] https://www.caiso.com/Documents/ Section34_Real-imeMarket_asof_Feb15_2018.pdf