A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to sustainable island-based tourism development

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering and UNESCO Chair in Water and Environment Management for Sustainable Cities, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, International Campus in Kish, Iran

3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This paper aims to propose a framework by which decision-makers can evaluate and compare alternatives for sustainable island-based tourism development. The uncertainties and risks involved in information and judgment within the evaluation process are taken into account by using a hybrid approach, which combines the Delphi method, fuzzy set theory, and a discrete multi-criteria method based on prospect theory called TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of interactive and multiple criteria decision making). The decision making model examines three different techniques of aggregating the viewpoints of different decision-makers and explores how the aggregation technique affects the ranking of the alternatives. To demonstrate the potential application of the proposed approach, it is examined for development of Hendourabi Island (Iran) for tourism. Results show that among the three development alternative plans, decision-makers prefer the medium-size development alternative, since it offers a balance between benefits of tourism market and costs of project development under an uncertain future. It also allows for adaptive management. Results also showed that the proposed approach which reduces loss regret in decision-making under uncertain future can be used effectively for planning the island development under an uncertain dynamic future considering the risk and uncertainty associated with human judgment.

Keywords


References
[1] World Tourism Organization (WTO) "Making Tourism More Sustainable: A Guide for Policy Makers", World Tourism Organization, Madrid (2007).
[2] Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Sedaghat, M., Maknoon, R., et al. "Sustainable tourism: a comprehensive literature review on frameworks and applications", Economic Research, 28(1), pp. 1–30 (2015).
[3] Chen, H.-S. "The Establishment and Application of Environment Sustainability Evaluation Indicators for Ecotourism Environments", Sustainability, 7(4), pp. 4727–4746 (2015). 
[4] Eusébio, C., Vieira, A.L. and Lima, S. "Place attachment, host–tourist interactions, and residents’ attitudes towards tourism development: the case of Boa Vista Island in Cape Verde", Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(6), pp. 890–909 (2018). 
[5] Lee, T.H., Jan, F.-H., Tseng, C.H., et al.  "Segmentation by recreation experience in island-based tourism: a case study of Taiwan’s Liuqiu Island", Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(3), pp. 362–378 (2017).
[6] Marion, J.L., Leung, Y.-F., Eagleston, H., et al. "A Review and Synthesis of Recreation Ecology Research Findings on Visitor Impacts to Wilderness and Protected Natural Areas", Journal of Forestry, 114(3), pp. 352–362 (2016).
[7] Mardani, A., Jusoh, A. and Zavadskas, E.K. "Fuzzy multiple criteria decision–making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014", Expert Systems with Applications, 42, pp. 4126–4148 (2015).
[8] Bellman, R. and Zadeh, L.A. "Decision-making in a fuzzy environment", Management Science, 17(4), pp. 141–64 (1970).
[9] Gomes, L.F.A.M. and Lima, M.M.P.P. "TODIM: Basics and application to multi criteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts", Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16, pp. 113–127 (1992). 
[10] Powell, C. "The Delphi technique: Myths and realities", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), pp. 376–382 (2003).
[11] Kaufmann, A. and Gupta, M.M. "Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science", North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988).
[12] Yang, X., Zeng, L. and Zhang, R. "Cloud Delphi method", International journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness & Knowledge-Based Systems, 20(1), pp. 77–97 (2012).
[13] Strack, P., Viefers, P. "Regret and economic decision-making", VOX CEPR Policy Portal (2014).
[14] Litwin, M.S. "How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity", Sage, London, UK (1995).
[15] Krohling, R. and Souza, T. "Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making", Expert Systems with Applications, 39, p. 11487–11493 (2012).
[16] Tseng, M.-L., Lin, Y.-H., Tan, K., et al. "Using TODIM to evaluate green supply chain practices under uncertainty", Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(11–12), pp. 2983–2995, (2014).
[17] Cinelli, M., Coles, S.R. and Kirwan, K. "Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment", Ecological Indicators, 46, pp. 138–148 (2014). 
[18] Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., et al. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection", Omega: The International Journal of Management Science (2018).
[19] Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk", Econometrica, 47, pp. 263–292 (1979).
[20] Alley, H., Bacinello, C.P., Hipel, K.W. "Fuzzy set approaches to planning in the Grand River Basin", Advances in Water Research, 2, pp. 3–12 (1979).
[21] Nguyen, Q. "Linking loss aversion and present bias with overspending behavior of tourists: Insights from a lab-in-the-field experiment", Tourism Management, 54, pp. 152–159 (2016).
[22] Chen, T., Ku, T.C., Tsui, C.W. "Determining attribute importance based on triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers in (z) fuzzy measures", The 19th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making (2008).
[23] Chang, P., Chen, Y. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for technology transfer strategy selection in biotechnology", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 63(2), pp. 131–139 (1994).
[24] Qin, Q., Liang, F., Li, L., Chen, Y.-W., et al. "A TODIM-based multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers", Applied Soft Computing, 55, pp. 93–107 (2017).
[25] Luo, S., Zhang, H., Wang, J., et al. "Group decision-making approach for evaluating the sustainability of constructed wetlands with probabilistic linguistic preference relations", Journal of the Operational Research Society, pp. 1–17 (2019). 
[26] Zhang, Y., Xu, Z. and Liao, H. "Water security evaluation based on the TODIM method with probabilistic linguistic term sets", Soft Computing (2018).
[27] Jahan, A., Edwards, K.L. "A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design", Materials & Design, 65, pp. 335–342 (2015).
[28] Znotinas, N.M., Hipel, K.W. "Comparison of alternative engineering designs", Water Resources Bulletin, 15, pp. 44–58 (1979).
[29] de Souza, T., Krohling, R. "Fuzzy TODIM for Group Decision Making", Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Investigacion Operativa, Rio de Janeiro (2012).
[30] Chunga, A., Oliverb, T., Goveb, J., et al. "Translating resilience-based management theory to practice for coral bleaching recovery in Hawaii", Marine Policy, 99, pp. 58–68 (2019).
[31] NJP Consulting Engineers, "Strategic Plan of Hendourabi Island", (2014).
Volume 28, Issue 2
Transactions on Civil Engineering (A)
March and April 2021
Pages 682-699
  • Receive Date: 20 May 2019
  • Revise Date: 25 June 2019
  • Accept Date: 30 September 2019