Weight determination and ranking priority in interval group MCDM

Document Type : Article


Department of Mathematics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran


In this study, we propose a method to determine the weight of decision makers (DMs) in group multiple criteria decision making (GMCDM) problems with interval data .Here, we obtain an interval weight for each DM and the relative closeness of each decision from the negative ideal solution (NIS) and the positive ideal solution (PIS) is then computed. In the proposed method, after weighting the decision matrix of each DM, the alternatives are ranked using interval arithmetic. A comparative example together with a real world problem on air quality assessment is given to illustrate our method. Our findings show that the proposed approach is a suitable tool to solve GMCDM problems.


Main Subjects

  1. References:

    1. Ishizaka, A. and Nemery P., Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software, John Wiley and Sons (2013).
    2. Keeney, R. and Rai_a, H., Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeo_s, New York: Wiley (1976).
    3. Koksalan, M., Wallenius, J., and Zoints, S., Multiple Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the 21st Century, World Scienti_c Publishing, New Jersey (2011).
    4. Jacquet-Lagr_eze, E. and Siskos, J. Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multiple criteria decision making", European Journal of Operational Research, 10, pp. 151{164 (1982).
    5. Solymosi, T. and Dombi, J. A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights", European Journal of Operational Research, 26, pp. 35{41 (1986).
    6. Guitouni, A. and Martel, J.M. Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method", European Journal of Operational Research, 109, pp. 501{521 (1998).
    7. Figueira, J., Salvatore, G., and Ehrgott, M., Eds, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, New York: Springer Science & Business Media (2005). 8. Wallenius, J., Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer, R.E., Zionts, S., and Deb, K. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead", Management Science, 54, pp. 1336{1349 (2008). 9. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (1981). 10. Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.-H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods", European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), pp. 445{455 (2004). 11. Saaty, T.L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, pp. 234{281 (1977). 12. Edwards, W. How to use multi attribute utility measurement for social decision making", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 7, pp. 326{ 340 (1977). 13. Banae Costa, C. and Vansnick, J.-C. MACBETH - An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions", International Transactions in Operational Research, 1, pp. 489{500 (1994). 14. Govindan, K. and Jespen, MB. ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications", European Journal of Operational Research, 250, pp. 1{29 (2016). 15. Ishizaka, A. and Siraj, S. Are multi-criteria decisionmaking tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods", European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), pp. 462{471 (2017). 16. Nassereddine, M. and Eskandari, H. An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran", Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, pp. 427{439 (2017). 17. Abdollahi, A., Pour-Moallem, N., and Abdollahi, A. Dynamic negawatt demand response resource modeling and prioritizing in power markets", Scientia Iranica, 27(3), pp. 1361{1372 (2020). S. Sa_arzadeh et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 27 (2020) 3242{3252 3251 18. Gou, X., Xu, Z., and Liao, H. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative queuing method for multiple criteria decision making", Information Sciences, 388, pp. 225{246 (2017). 19. Ren, Z., Xu, Z., and Wang, H. Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method", Information Sciences, 388, pp. 1{16 (2017). 20. Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z., and Adeli, H. Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications in engineering", Scientia Iranica., Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 23(1), p. 1 (2016). 21. Chen, L. and Xu, Z. A new prioritized multi-criteria outranking method: The prioritized PROMETHEE", Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29(5), pp. 2099{2110 (2015). 22. Yu, X., Xu, Z., and Ma, Y. Prioritized multi-criteria decision making based on the idea of PROMETHEE", Procedia Computer Science, 17, pp. 449{456 (2013). 23. Keeney, R.L. and Kirkwood, C.W. Group decision making using cardinal social welfare functions", Management Science, 22, pp. 430{437 (1975). 24. Keeney, R.L. A group preference axiomatization with cardinal utility", Management Science, 23, pp. 140{ 145 (1976). 25. Brock, H.W. The problem of 'utility weights' in group preference aggregation", Operations Research, 28, pp. 176{187 (1980). 26. Ramanathan, R. and Ganesh, L.S. Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages", European Journal of Operational Research, 79, pp. 249{265 (1994). 27. Van den Honert, R.C. Decisional power in group decision making: a note on the allocation of group members weights in the multiplicative AHP and SMART", Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, pp. 275{286 (2001). 28. Xu, Z.S. Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations", Information Sciences, 178, pp. 452{467 (2008). 29. Abootalebi, S., Hadi-Vencheh, A., and Jamshidi, A. An Improvement to determining expert weights in group multiple attribute decision making problem", Group Decision and Negotiation, 27(2), pp. 215{221 (2018). 30. Wang, H.-F., Multicriteria Decision Analysis - From Certainty to Uncertainty, Ting Lung Book Co, Taipei (2004). 31. Mahmoudi, A., Sadi-Nezhad, S., and Makui, A. An extended fuzzy VIKOR for group decisionmaking based on fuzzy distance to supplier selection", Scientia Iranica., Transactions E, Industrial Engineering, 23(4), p. 1879 (2016). 32. Hu, J., Chen, P., and Chen, X. Intuitionistic random multi-criteria decision-making approach based on prospect theory with multiple reference intervals", Scientia Iranica., Transactions E, Industrial Engineering, 21(6), p. 2347 (2014). 33. Minatour, Y., Khazaie, J., Ataei, M., and Javadi, A.A. An integrated decision support system for dam site selection", Scientia Iranica., Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 22(2), p. 319 (2015). 34. Yu, X., Zhang, S., Liao, X., and Qi, X. ELECTRE methods in prioritized MCDM environment", Information Sciences, 424, pp. 301{316 (2018). 35. Yue, Z. An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers", Knowledge- Based Systems, 24, pp. 146{153 (2011). 36. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh Lot_, F., and Izadikhah, M. An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 175, pp. 1375{1384 (2006). 37. Sayadi, M.K., Heydari, M., and Shahanaghi, K. Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers", Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33, pp. 2257{2262 (2009). 38. Rezaei, J. and Salimi, N. Optimal ABC inventory classi_cation using interval Programming", International Journal of Systems Science, 46(11), pp. 1944{ 1952 (2015). 39. Dymova, L., Sevastjanov, P., and Tikhonenko, A. A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method", Expert Systems with Applications, 40, pp. 4841{4847 (2013). 40. Hafezalkotob, A., Hafezalkotob, A., and Sayadi, M.K. Extension of MULTIMOORA method with interval numbers: An application in materials selection", Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40, pp. 1372{1386 (2016). 41. Liu, W. and Li, L. An approach to determining the integrated weights of decision makers based on interval number group decision matrices", Knowledge-Based Systems, 90, pp. 92{98 (2015). 42. Pamu_car, D., Stevi_c, _Z., and Zavadskas, E.K. Integration of interval rough AHP and interval rough MABAC methods for evaluating university web pages", Applied Soft Computing, 67, pp. 141{163 (2018). 43. Feng, Y., Hong, Z., Tian, G., Li, Z., Tan, J., and Hu, H. Environmentally friendly MCDM of reliabilitybased product optimisation combining DEMATELbased ANP, interval uncertainty and Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR)", Information Sciences, 442, pp. 128{144 (2018). 44. Wanke, P., Kalam Azad, M.A., Barros, C.P., and Hadi-Vencheh, A. Predicting performance in ASEAN banks: an integrated fuzzy MCDM-neural network approach", Expert Systems, 33(3), pp. 213{229 (2016). 3252 S. Sa_arzadeh et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 27 (2020) 3242{3252 45. Hajek, P. and Froelich, W. Integrating TOPSIS with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps for e_ective group decision making", Information Sciences, 485, pp. 394{412 (2019). 46. Frini, A. and Amor, S.B. MUPOM: A multi-criteria multi-period outranking method for decision-making in sustainable development context", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 76, pp. 10{25 (2019). 47. Alefeld, G. and Herzberger, J., Introduction to Interval Computations, New York: Academic Press (1983). 48. Xu, Z.S. On method for uncertain multiple attribute decision making problems with uncertain multiplicative preference information on alternatives", Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 4, pp. 131{139 (2005). 49. Xu, Z.S. Dependent uncertain ordered weighted aggregation operators", Information Fusion, 9, pp. 310{ 316 (2008). 50. Li, D.-F. Relative ratio method for multiple attribute decision making problems", International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(2) pp. 289{311 (2009).