Document Type : Article

**Authors**

School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran-16, Iran

**Abstract**

In this paper, an efficient reliability method is proposed. The Asymptotic Sampling (AS) and Weighted Simulation (WS) are two main basic tools of the presented method. In AS, the standard deviation of the distributions are amplified at several levels to find an adequate number of failed samples, then by using a simple regression technique, the reliability index is determined. The WS is another method which uses the uniform distribution for sampling, where the information about the distributions of the variables is taken into account through the weight indexes. The WS provides interesting flexibility where a sample generated for a specific standard deviation can be used as a sample for another standard deviation without having to reevaluate the limit state function. In AS the deviations of variables are scaled in each step, where one can use the flexibility of the WS to decrease the required calls of limit state function. Using this technique results in a new efficient method so-called Asymptotic Weighted Simulation (AWS). In addition, using the strengths of both AS and WS can be considered another superiority of the hybrid version. Performance of the presented method is investigated by solving several mathematical and engineering examples.

**Keywords**

Refrences:

1.Zio, E. Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(2), pp.125-141 (2009).

2. Selvik, J.T. and Signoret, J.-P. How to interpret safety critical failures in risk and reliability assessments", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 161, pp. 61-68 (2017).

3. Thoft-Cristensen, P. and Baker, M.J., Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications, Springer Science & Business Media (2012). 4. Frangopol, D.M. and Maute, K. Life-cycle reliabilitybased optimization of civil and aerospace structures", Computers & Structures, 81(7), pp. 397-410 (2003). 5. Chakraborty, S. and Majumder, D. Hybrid reliability analysis framework for reliability analysis of tunnels", Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 32(4), p. 04018018 (2018). 6. Okasha, N.M. Proposed algorithms for an e_cient system reliability-based design optimization of truss structures", Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(5), p. 04016008 (2016). 7. Bucher, C., Computational Analysis of Randomness in Structural Mechanics, CRC Press, London (2009). 8. Hasofer, A.M. and Lind, N.C. Exact and invariant second-moment code format", Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 100(1), pp. 111-121 (1974). 9. Aslam, M., Tahir, M., and Hussain, Z. Reliability analysis of 3-component mixture of distributions", Scientia Iranica, 25(3), pp. 1768-1781 (2018). 10. Macke, M. and Bucher, C. Importance sampling for randomly excited dynamical systems", Journal of Sound and Vibration, 268(2), pp. 269-290 (2003). 11. Bucher, C. Asymptotic sampling for high-dimensional reliability analysis", Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 24(4), pp. 504-510 (2009). 12. Rashki, M., Miri, M., and Moghaddam, M.A. A new e_cient simulation method to approximate the probability of failure and most probable point", Structural Safety, 39, pp. 22-29 (2012). 13. Kaveh, A., Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures, Springer, Switzerland (2017). 14. Kaveh, A. and Dadras, A. A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm: Thermal exchange optimization", Advances in Engineering Software, 110, pp. 69- 84 (2017). 15. Kaveh, A., Dadras, A., and Montazeran, A.H. Chaotic enhanced colliding bodies algorithms for size optimization of truss structures", Acta Mechanica, 229(7), pp. 2883-2907 (2018). 16. Kaveh, A., Dadras, A., and Malek, N.G. Buckling load of laminated composite plates using three variants of the biogeography-based optimization algorithm", Acta Mechanica, 229(4), pp. 1551-1566 (2018). 17. A. Rahmati, S.H., Ahmadi, A., and Karimi, B. Developing simulation based optimization mechanism for a novel stochastic reliability centered maintenance problem", Scientia Iranica, 25(5), pp. 2788-2806 (2018). 18. Gharib, Z., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., and Naja_, E. A cluster-based emergency vehicle routing problem in disaster with reliability", Scientia Iranica, 25(4), pp. 2312-2330 (2018). 19. Breitung, K. Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals", Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 110(3), pp. 357-366 (1984). 20. Gasser, C. and Bucher, C. An optimized strategy for using asymptotic sampling for reliability analysis", Structural Safety, 71, pp. 33-40 (2018). 21. Chen, X. and Li, J. A subset multicanonical Monte Carlo method for simulating rare failure events", Journal of Computational Physics, 344, pp. 23-35 (2017). 22. Kim, S.-H. and Na, S.-W. Response surface method using vector projected sampling points", Structural Safety, 19(1), pp. 3-19 (1997). 23. Elegbede, C. Structural reliability assessment based on particles swarm optimization", Structural Safety, 27(2), pp. 171-186 (2005). 24. Weingarten, V. and Seide, P. NASA SP-8019{ buckling of thin-walled truncated cones", NASA Space vehicle Design Criteria-Structures (1968). 25. Rashki, M., Miri, M., and Moghaddam, M.A. A simulation-based method for reliability based design optimization problems with highly nonlinear constraints", Automation in Construction, 47, pp. 24-36 (2014). 26. Song, S., Lu, Z., and Qiao, H. Subset simulation for structural reliability sensitivity analysis", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(2), pp. 658-665 (2009).

Transactions on Civil Engineering (A)

July and August 2019Pages 2108-2122