Product substitution with customer segmentation under panic buying behavior

Document Type : Article

Authors

Department of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Under conditions of consumer panic buying, satisfying demand with the available products is a complex problem. In reality, most retailers accept alternative products during panic situations. This study considers the case of firm-driven substitution of products (differing in weight) based on retailer preferences over two periods. In the proposed model, panic behavior emerged in the first period and supply disruption occurred in the second period. Under this model, retail stores were segmented into high index (valuable) and low index (less valuable) customers. Before meeting the demand of low-index customers, wholesalers attempt to satiate high-index customer’s panic buying behavior. We determined the optimal number of units to be substituted, order quantities, and leftover units that generated maximum total profits for the wholesaler. The performance of the model was analyzed both with and without customer-segmented substitution. To gain managerial insights, we also examined the influence of both the degree of supply disruption and substitution costs on decisions and profits. The results can assist business managers to improve the decision-making process.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References:
1.    “Motorists resort to panic buying”, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/motorists-resort-to-panic-buying/article7710190.ece.1 October 2015. The Hindu, (2015).
2.    “NOC dispatches fuel exceeding daily demand”, https://thehimalayan-times.com/nepal/noc-dispatches-fuel-exceeding-daily-demand/. The Himalayan Times, (2015).
3.    Shou, B. Xiong. H., and Shen, Z.M. “Consumer panic buying and quota policy under interruption in supplys”, working paper, (2016).
4.    Fang, Y. and Shou, B. “Managing supply uncertainty under supply chain Cournot competition”, European Journal of Operational Research, 243, pp. 156–176 (2015).
5.    Kumar, M. Basu, P., and Avittathur, B. “Pricing and sourcing strategies for competing retailers in supply chains under disruption risk”, European Journal of Operational Research, 265, pp.  533–543 (2018).
6.    He, B. Huang, H., and Yuan, K. “The comparison of two procurement strategies in the presence of interruption in supply”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85, pp. 296–305 (2015).
7.    Maclaughlin, S.  “Japanese supermarket shelves are left completely empty as panic buying takes hold after deadly earthquake”, Daily mail Online, (2016). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3545172/Japanese-locals-panic-buy-supplies-shelves-leaving-queue-food-water-two-deadly-earthquakes-kill-41-people.html. 18 April 2016.
8.    Mardan, E. Sadegh Amalnick, M. Rabbani, M., and Jolai, F. “A robust optimization approach for an inventory problem with emergency ordering and product substitution in an uncertain environment: A case study in pharmaceutical industry”, Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering, 24, pp. 1533-1546 (2017).
9.    Transchel, S.  “Inventory management under price-based and stock out based substitution”, European Journal of Operational Research, 262, pp. 996–1008 (2017).
10.    Rao, U. S.  Swaminathan, J. M., and Zhang, J.  “Multi-product inventory planning with downward substitution, stochastic demand and setup costs”, IIE Transactions, 36, pp. 59–71 (2004).
11.    Netessine, S. and Rudi, N.  “Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution”, Operations Research, 51( 2), pp. 329–335 (2003).       
12.    Hoseininiaa, M.  Esfahani, M.M.S.  Didehvar, F., and Haghi, A. “Inventory competition in a multi-channel distribution system: The Nash and Stackelberg game”, Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering, 20, pp. 846–854 (2013).
13.    Y¨ucel, E.  Karaesmen, F.  Salman, F.S., and T¨urkay, M.  “Optimizing product assortment under customer-driven demand substitution”, European Journal of Operational Research, 199, pp.759–768 (2009).   
14.    Stavrulaki, E. “Inventory decisions for substitutable products with stock-dependent demand”, International Journal of Production Economics, 129, pp. 65–78 (2011).
15.    Vaagen, H.  Wallace, S. W., and Kaut, M.  “Modelling consumer-directed substitution”, International Journal of Production Economics,134, pp. 388-397 (2011).
16.    Bayindir, Z. P.  Erkip, N., and Gullu, R. “Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution and capacity constraint”, Computers & Operations Research, 34, pp. 487–514 (2007).
17.    Kim, S.W. and Bell, P.C. “A note on the optimal pricing and production decisions with price-driven substitution”, International Transactions in Operational Research, 22 (6), pp. 1097–1116 (2015).
18.    Pentico, D. W.  “The assortment problem: A survey”, European Journal of Operational Research, 190, pp. 295-309 (2008).
19.    Lang, J. C. and Domschke, W.  “Efficient reformulations for dynamic lot-sizing problems with product substitution”, OR Spectrum 32, pp. 263-291 (2010).
20.    Yu, Y. Shou, B.  Ni, Y., and Chen, L.  “Optimal production, pricing, and substitution policies in continuous review production-inventory systems”, European Journal of Operational Research, 260, pp. 631–649 (2016).
21.    Xu, H.  Yao, D. D., and Zheng, S.  “Optimal policies for a two-product inventory system under a flexible substitution scheme”, Production and Operations Management, 25 (6), pp. 1088–1105 (2016).
22.    Peebles, G.   “Famine and Government Neglect in Ethiopia”, http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/01/08/famine-and-government-neglect-in-ethiopia/.  Counterpunch, (2016).
23.    Ervolina, T.  Ettl, M.  Lee, Y., and Peters, D.  “Managing product availability in an assemble-to-order supply chain with multiple customer segments”, OR Spectrum, 31(1), pp. 257–280 (2009).
24.    Jua, W.  Gabor, A. F., and van Ommeren, J.C.W.  “An approximate policy for a dual-sourcing inventory model with positive lead times and binomial yield”, European Journal of Operational Research, 244, pp. 490–497(2015).
25.    Hsu, V.N. Li C.-N., and Xiao W “Dynamic lot size problems with one-way product substitution”, IIE Transactions, 37, pp. 201-21 (2005). 
26.    Tsao, Y.-C. Praveen, V.R.P.R, and Yu, V.  "Product substitution in different weights and brands considering customer segmentation and panic buying behavior", Industrial Marketing Management, working paper, (2018).
27.    Yglesias, M. “The case for price gouging”, URL http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2012/10/sandy_price_gouging_anti_gouging_laws_make_natural_disasters_worse.html, (2012).
28.    Dixit, A. K. and Pindyck, R. S. “Investment under Uncertainty”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1994).
29.    Li, C.L. and Kouvelis, P. “Flexible and Risk-Sharing Supply Contracts Under Price Uncertainty”, Management Science, 45(10), pp. 1378-1398 (1999).
Scientia Iranica
Volume 27, Issue 5 - Serial Number 5
Transactions on Industrial Engineering (E)
September and October 2020
Pages 2514-2528

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics