Laboratory investigation of geotextile position on CBR of clayey sand soil under freeze-thaw cycle

Document Type : Research Note


1 Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran


In cold regions, soil experiences repetitive freeze–thaw cycles that are considered as one of the most important phenomena in cold region engineering. Approximately 30 percent of soils around the world and a large portion of fertile lands are subjected to daily or seasonal freeze-thaw cycles. These cycles cause considerable changes in water content, solute movement, permeability, strength parameters, erosion rate, and other physical or chemical characteristics of the soil. Nowadays, one of the ways for improvement the physical and mechanical characteristics of the soil is to incorporate geosynthetic material as a layer between the embankment and the ground surface. This paper presents results of some California Bearing Ratio tests a clayey sandy soil. Moreover, effect of freeze–thaw cycles on the compressive strength of geotextile-reinforced soil is investigated. The geotextile layer was placed in five positions in different depths of 1.3, 2.6, 3.9, 5.85 and 7.8 cm beneath the surface of the mold and then the sample was exposed to freeze-thaw cycles. It was found that the optimum depth of the geotextile layer is 3.9 cm. In addition, it could be observed that reinforcing the soil can diminish the weakening effect of freeze-thaw cycles up to 41.7%.


Main Subjects

1. Leroueil, S., Tardif, J., Roy, M., Rochelle, P.L., and  Konrad, J.M. E_ects of frost on the mechanical  behaviour of Champlain Sea clays", Can. Geotech. J.,  28(5), pp. 690{697 (1991).  
2. Eigenbrod, K.D. E_ects of cyclic freezing and thawing  on volume changes and permeabilities of soft _negained  soils", Can. Geotech. J., 33(4), pp. 529{537  (1996).  
3. Laeur, J., Sall, M.S., and Ducharme, A. Frictional  characteristics of geotextiles with compacted lateritic  gravels and clays", Geosynth. New Orleans, 87(1), pp.  205{215 (1987).  4. Yarbasi, N., Kalkan, E., and Akbulut, S. Modi_cation  of the geotechnical properties, as inuenced by freezethaw,  of granular soils with waste additives", Cold.  Reg. Sci. Technol., 48(1), pp. 44{54 (2007).  
5. Hazirbaba, K. and Gullu, H. California bearing ratio  improvement and freeze-thaw performance of _negrained  soils treated with geo_ber and synthetic uid  MM", Cold. Reg. Sci. Technol., 63(1), pp. 50{60  (2010).  
6. Ghazavi, M. and Roustaie, M. The inuence of freezethaw  cycles on the uncon_ned compressive strength of  _ber-reinforced clay", Cold. Reg. Sci. Technol., 61(2),  pp. 125{131 (2010).  
7. Ghazavi, M. and Roustaei, M. Freeze-thaw performance  of clayey soil reinforced with geotextile layer",  Cold. Reg. Sci. Technol., 89, pp. 22{29 (2013).  
8. Guido, V.A., Chang, D.K., and Sweeney, M.A. Comparison  of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth  slabs", Can. Geotech. J., 23(4), pp. 435{440 (1986).  
9. Espinoza, R.D. Soil-geotextile interaction: evaluation  of membrane support", Geotext and Geomembranes.,  13(5), pp. 281{293 (1994).  
10. Espinoza, R.D. and Bray, J.D. An integrated approach  to evaluating single-layer reinforced soils",  Geosynth. Int., 2(4), pp. 723{739 (1995).  
11. Adams, M.T. and Collin, J.G. Large model spread  footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil",  Foundations. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 123(1),  pp. 66{72 (1997).  
12. Tom, A.F., Abraham, A., and Chacko, A. Inuence  of position of geosynthetic layer in pavement", Int. J.  Eng.Res. Dev., 6(4), pp. 74{78 (2013).  
13. Michael, M. and Vinod, P. California bearing ratio  of coir geotextile reinforced subgrade", 10th National  Conference on Technological Trends (NCTT09), 6{7,  pp. 63{67 (2009).  
14. ASTM D422-63, Standard Test Method for Particle-  Size Analysis of Soils,West Conshohocken, PA, United  States (2007).  15. ASTM D 1883, Standard Test Method for CBR (California  Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soil,  West Conshohocken, PA, United States (2007).  
16. ASTM D 5918, Standard Test Methods for Frost Heave  and Thaw Weakening Susceptibility of Soils, West  Conshohocken, PA, United States (2006).  
17. Roustaei, M., Ghazavi, M., and Aliaghaei, E. Application  of tire crumbs on mechanical properties of a  clayey soil subjected to freeze-thaw cycles", Scientia  Iranica, Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 23(1), pp.  122{132 (2016).  
18. Yoder, E.J. and Witczak, M.W., Principles of Pavement  Design, Wiley, New York (1975).  
19. Chamberlain, E.J. Frost susceptibility of soil: review  of index tests", Monograph 81-2. U.S. Army Cold. Reg.  Res. Eng. Lab., New Hampshire (1981).  
20. Cook, R.D. Some e_ects of closed system freezethaw  cycles on a compacted, highly plastic clay", PhD  Dissertation, University of Alberta (1963).  21. Lee, W., Bohra, N.C., Altschae_, A.G., and White,  T.D. Resilient modulus of cohesive soils and the e_ect  of freeze-thaw", Can. Geotech. J., 32(4), pp. 559{568  (1995).  
22. Ahmed Kamel, M., Chandra, S., and Kumar, P.  Behavior of subgrade soil reinforced with geogrid",  Int. J. of Pavement. Eng., 5(4), pp. 201{209 (2004).  2816 B. Shams et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 27 (2020) 2808{2816  
23. Han, J. and Jiang, Y. Use of geosynthetics for  performance enhancement of earth structures in cold  regions", Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 5(5), pp.  517{529 (2013).