Lean design management using a gamified system

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, 16846, Iran

2 School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

3 The Haskell & Irene Lemon Construction Science Division, College of Architecture, University of Oklahoma, 830 Van Vleet Oval, Room 294GH, Norman, OK 73019-6141, USA

Abstract

Design process, due to its information- and innovation-intensive nature, is highly susceptible to change, thus waste. This attracted the attention of lean design/construction professionals in the past few years. However, limited, if any, researches have addressed this issue from the human behavior perspective. This research proposes a method that exploits the potential of the Last PlannerÒ System (LPS) in design management. The main contribution of this paper is improving the applicability of the LPS to design processes by incorporating a gamified pay-for-performance system to the normal practice of the LPS. It encourages motivating design engineers by granting them single point, autonomous responsibility to perform their tasks. To this end, the proposed method shifts the focus of design managers away from predicting the workflow and chronologies of design tasks towards motivating design engineers to eliminate non-value-adding works/time. To bolster the concept and examine the method, it was put into practice by construction design teams. Findings corroborate the efficiency of the method in eliminating the non-value-adding works from design processes. The findings are of practical value to consulting firms, especially design team managers who seek to maximize innovation, competency and quality outcome.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References:
1. Ballard, G. and Koskela, L. "On the agenda of design management research", Proceedings IGLC, pp. 52-69 (1998).
2. Mazlum, S.K. and Pekericli, M.K. "Lean design management-an evaluation of waste items for architectural design process", METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 33, pp. 1-20 (2016).
3. Koskela, L., Ballard, G., and Tanhuanpaa, V.P. "Towards lean design management", Proceedings of the 5th  Annual  Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Gold Coast, pp. 1-13 (1997).
4. Yu, H., Tweed, T., Al-Hussein, M., and Nasseri, R., "Development of lean model for house construction using value stream mapping", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135, pp. 782-790 (2009).
5. Hopp, W.J. and Spearman, M.L., Factory Physics, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill (2008).
6. Steward, D.V., Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy, and Design, Petrocelli Books (1981).
7. Arashpour, M., Wakefield, R., Abbasi, B., Lee, E.W.M., and Minas, J. "Off-site construction optimization: Sequencing multiple job classes with time constraints", Automation in Construction, 71, pp. 262- 270 (2016).
8. Goldratt, E.M., Critical Chain, North River Press (1997).
9. Ballard, H., The Last Planner System of Production Control, University of Birmingham (2000).
10. Russell, M.M., Liu, M., Howell, G., and Hsiang, S.M. "Case studies of the allocation and reduction of time buffer through use of the last planner system", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141, p. 04014068 (2015).
11. Fosse, R. and Ballard, G. "Lean design management in practice with the last planner system", 24th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Boston (2016).
12. Khan, S. and Tzortzopoulos, P. "Improving design work flow with the last planner system: Two action research studies", 23rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, pp. 568-577(2015).
13. Hansen, G.K. and Olsson, N.O.E. "Layered project{layered process: lean thinking and  flexible solutions", Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7, pp. 70-84 (2011).
14. El. Reifi, M.H. and Emmitt, S. "Perceptions of lean design management", Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 9, pp. 195-208 (2013).
15. Bolviken, T., Gullbrekken, B., and Nyseth, K. "Collaborative design management", 18th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Haifa, Israel, pp. 103-112 (2010).
16. Hamzeh, F.R., Ballard, G., and Tommelein, I.D. "Is the last planner system applicable to design? A case study", 17th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 165- 176 (2009).
17. Fundli, I.S. and Drevland, F. "Collaborative design management - A case study", 22nd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction: Understanding and Improving Project Based Production, IGLC, pp. 627-638 (2014).
18. Rosas, E. "Integrating the design structure matrix and the last planner system into Building Design", 21th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Fortaleza, Brazil, pp. 389-398 (2013).
19. Vaagen, H. and Aas, B., A Multidisciplinary Framework for Robust Planning and Decision-Making in Dynamically Changing Engineering Construction Projects, pp. 515-522 (2014).
20. Cameron, I., Hare, B., Duff, R., and Maloney, B. "An investigation of approaches to worker engagement", HSE RR516 (2006).
21. Xue, X., Shen, Q., and Ren, Z. "Critical review of collaborative working in construction projects: Business environment and human behaviors", Journal of Management in Engineering, 26, pp. 196-208 (2010).
22. Bartoska, J. and Subrt, T. "The effect of human agent in project management", Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20 pp. 369-382 (2012).
23. Parkinson, C.N., Parkinson's Law (1984).
24. Leach, L.P. "Critical chain project management improves project performance", Project Management Journal (1999).
25. Kamma, D., Geetha, G., and Neela, J.P. "Countering Parkinson's law for improving productivity", Proceedings of the 6th India Software Engineering Conference on - ISEC, New York, USA, 13, pp. 91-96 (2013).
26. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., and Ross, M. "Exploring the planning fallacy: Why people underestimate their task completion times", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, p. 366 (1994).
27. Roy, M.M., Christenfeld, N.J.S., and Mckenzie, C.R.M. "Underestimating the duration of future events: memory incorrectly used or memory bias?", Psychological Bulletin, 131, p. 738 (2005).
28. Williams, T., Modelling complex Projects, John Wiley & Sons (2001).
29. Park, M. and Pe~na-Mora, F. "Dynamic change management for construction: introducing the change cycle into model-based project management", System Dynamics Review, 19, pp. 213-242 (2003).
30. Nepal, M.P., Park, M., and Son, B. "Effects of schedule pressure on construction performance", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132, pp. 182-188 (2006).
31. Hamzeh, F.R., Improving Construction Work flow-The Role of Production Planning and Control (2009).
32. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., and Nacke, L. "From game design elements to gamefulness", Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments- MindTrek'11, New York, USA, p. 9 (2011).
33. Juul, J., A Casual Revolution: Reinventing Video Games and Their Players, MIT press (2010).
34. Paharia, R., Loyalty 3.0: How to Revolutionize Customer and Employee Engagement with Big Data and Gamification, McGraw Hill Professional (2013).
35. Hamari, J. "Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service", Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12, pp. 236-245 (2013).
36. Reiners, T., and Wood L., Gamification in Education and Business, Springer International Publishing (2015).
37. Ruhi, U. "Level up your strategy: Towards a descriptive framework for meaningful enterprise gamification", Technology Innovation Management Review, 5, p. 5 (2015).
38. Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P., New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance, Routledge (2013).
39. Armstrong, M. and Murlis, H., Reward Management: A Handbook of Remuneration Strategy and Practice, Kogan Page Publishers (2007).
40. Obe, R. and Hsu, L., PostgreSQL: Up and Running, O'Reilly Media, Inc. (2012).
41. Rossum, G.V., Python Reference Manual, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica (1995).
42. Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, Inc., p. 616 (2013).

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 18 March 2017
  • Revise Date: 05 February 2018
  • Accept Date: 16 April 2018

Share

How to cite

Statistics