Application of Ductile Fracture Criterion for Tensile Test of Zirconium Alloy 702

Document Type : Research Note


1 Department of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua 500, Taiwan, R.O.C.

2 Department of Mechatronic Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei , Taiwan, R.O.C.


In this study using ductile fracture criterion defined fracture energy, determining the critical damage value of normalized Cockcroft –Latham. True stress-strain value and materials properties were obtained from the tensile tests of zirconium alloy 702 and finite element analysis. It was observed that specimen fracture the maximum value occurred in the central area of the cross section, the highest critical damage value equal to 0.649. In this paper, through the inverse analysis method of the FEA to explore on rarely research data zirconium alloys. The results proposed to evaluate the forgeability, expect the present study could be used as a basis of designing and developing zirconium alloy.


Main Subjects


1. Pereira, I.M., Rubi, M.G., and Acselrad, O. Comparison of the experimental and the numerically predicted mechanical damage in the sheet forming of steel", J. Mater. Process. Technol., 203(1-3), pp. 13-18 (2008).
2. Quan, G.Z., Tong, Y., and Chen, B. A constitutive description for drawing limit of magnesium alloy tube based on continuum damage mechanics", Mater. Sci.
Forum., 610-613, pp. 951-954 (2009).
D.-C. Chen et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions B: Mechanical Engineering 25 (2018) 824{829 829
3. Komori, K. E ect of ductile fracture criteria on
chevron crack formation and evolution in drawing",
Int. J. of Mech. Sci., 45(1), pp. 141-160 (2003).
4. Hambli, R. and Reszka, M. Fracture criteria identi -
cation using an inverse technique method and blanking
experiment", Int. J. of Mech. Sci., 44(7), pp. 1349-
1361 (2002).
5. Dey, S., B?rvik, T. Hopperstad, O.S. and Langseth,
M. On the in
uence of fracture criterion in projectile
impact of steel plates", Comput. Mater. Sci., 38(1),
pp. 176-191 (2006).
6. Zhu, Q.J., He, Y.F. and Yin, Y. Finite element analysis
of deformation mechanism for porous materials under

uid-solid interaction", Mater. Res. Innovations.,
18, pp. 22-27 (2014).
7. Jia, S.F., Zhan, L.H., and Zhang, J. In
uence of solid
solution treatment on microstructure and mechanical
properties of 2219 aluminum alloy", Mater. Res. Innovations.,
18, pp. 52-58 (2014).
8. Chen, D.C. and You, C.S. Fracture criterion for
the tensile test of 7075 aluminum alloy", Strength of
Materials., 47(1), pp. 122-127 (2015).
9. Caoa, T.S., Bobadillab, C.P., Montmitonneta, P., and
Boucharda, P.O. A comparative study of three ductile
damage approaches for fracture prediction in cold
forming processes", J. Mater. Process. Technol., 216,
pp. 385-404 (2015).
10. Cho, H., Ngalle, G., and Altan, T. Simultaneous
determination of
ow stress and interface friction by
nite element based inverse analysis technique", CIRP
Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 52(1), pp. 221-
224 (2003).
11. Joun, M., Choi, I., Eom, J., and Lee, M. Finite
element analysis of tensile testing with emphasis on
necking", Comput. Mater. Sci., 41(1), pp. 63-69
12. Andrzej, G. and Jacek, P. Determining the normalized
Cockcroft-Latham criterion for titanium alloy
Ti6Al4V in tensile testing at room temperature",
Proceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical,
Chemical, and Material Engineering (MCM 2015),
Paper No. 248, Barcelona, Spain (2015).
13. Chen, C.C., Oh, S.I., and Kobayashi, S. Ductile fracture
in axisymmetric extrusion and drawing", Journal
of Engineering for Industry., 101, pp. 36-44 (1979).