Portfolio Optimization in Electricity Market Using a Novel Risk Based Decision Making Approach

Document Type : Article


Faculty of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran


This paper provides generation companies (GENCOs) with a novel decision-making tool that accounts for both long term and short term risk aversion preferences and devises optimal strategies to participate in energy, ancillary services markets and forward contracts where possibility of involvement in arbitrage opportunities is also considered. Because of the imprecise nature of the decision maker’s judgment, appropriate modelling of risk aversion attitude of the GENCO is another challenge. This paper uses fuzzy satisfaction theory to express decision maker’s attitude toward risk. Conditional value at risk methodology (CVaR) is utilized as the measure of risk and uncertainty sources include prices for the day-ahead energy market, automatic generation control (AGC) and reserve markets. By applying the proposed method, not only trading loss over the whole scheduling horizon can be controlled, but also the amount of imposed loss during every time period can be reduced. An illustrative case study is provided for further analysis.


Main Subjects

1. Krokhmal, P. and Uryasev, S. Portfolio optimization
with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints",
J. Risk, 4, pp. 11-27 (2001).
2. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D., and
Ku, H. Multiperiod Risk and Coherent Multi-period
Risk Measurement, E.T.H.Zurich, Preprint (2002).
3. Bodie, Z., Kane, A., and Marcus, A.J., Investment,
Chicago, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 4th Edn. (1999).
4. Ni, E., Luh, P.B., and Rourke, S. Optimal integrated
generation bidding & scheduling with risk management
under a deregulated power market", IEEE Transactions
on Power Systems, 19, pp. 600-609 (2004).
5. Yamin, H.Y. and Shahidehpour, S.M. Risk and pro t
in self-scheduling for gencos", IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, 19, pp. 2104-2106 (2004).
6. Liu, M. and Wu, F.F. Managing price risk in a multimarket
environment", IEEE Transactions on Power
Systems, 21, pp. 1512-1519 (2006).
7. Jain, A.K., Srivastava, S.C., Sing, S.N., and Srivastava,
L. Strategic bidding in transmission constrained
electricity markets using arti cial bee colony algorithm",
Electric Power Components and Systems, 40,
pp. 1768-1788 (2012).
8. Luo, X., Chung, C., Yang, H., and Tong, X. Optimal
bidding strategy for generation companies under CVaR
constraint", International Transactions on Electrical
Energy Systems, 24, pp. 1369-1384 (2014).
9. Garces, L.P. and Conejo, A.J. Weekly self-scheduling,
forward contracting, and o ering strategy for a producer",
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 25, pp.
657-666 (2010).
10. Liu, H. and Hou, Y. The mean-wcvar based model
for ldc's optimal portfolio in multi-energy markets",
International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems,
22, pp. 367-377 (2012)
11. Conejo, A.J., Garca-Bertrand, R., Carrion, M., Caballero,
A., and de Andres, A.Optimal involvement
in futures markets of a power producer", IEEE Transactions
on Power Systems, 23, pp. 703-711 (2008).
12. Xu, Z., Hu, Z., Song, Y., and Wang, J. "Risk-averse
optimal bidding strategy for demandside resource
aggregators in day-ahead electricity markets under
uncertainty", IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8,
pp. 96-105 (2017).
13. Rahmani Dabbagh, S. and Sheikh-El-Eslami, M.K.
Risk assessment of virtual power plants o ering in
energy and reserve markets", IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, 31, pp. 3572-3582 (2016).
14. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D.,
and Ku, H. Coherent multi-period risk adjusted
values and Bellman's principle", Annals of Operation
Research, 152, pp. 5-22 (2007).
15. Growe-Kuska, J.N., Heitsch, H., and Romisch, W.
Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction
for power management problems", Proc, IEEE Power
Technology Conference, 3, pp. 23-26 (2003).
16. Birge, R. and Louveaux, F., Introduction to Stochastic
Programming, New York: Springer (1997).
17. Xi, L., Yu, T., Yang, B., and Zhang, X. A novel
multi-agent decentralized win or learn fast policy hillclimbing
with eligibility trace algorithm for smart
generation control of interconnected complex power
grids", Energy Conversion and Management, 103, pp.
82-93 (2015).
18. Xi, L., Yu, T., Yang, B., Zhang, X., and Qiu, X.
A wolf pack hunting strategy based virtual tribes
control for automatic generation control of smart grid",
Applied Energy, 178, pp. 198-211 (2016).
19. Xi, L., Zhang, Z., Yang, B., Huang, L., and Yu, T.
Wolf pack hunting strategy for automatic generation
control of an islanding smart distribution network",
Energy Conversion and Management, 122, pp. 10-24
20. Li, Z. and Shahidehpour, S.M. Security-constrained
unit commitment for simultaneous clearing of energy
and ancillary services markets", IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., 20(2), pp. 1079-1088 (2005).
21. European energy exchange", [Online], Available:
http://www.eex.com (2007)
22. Iberian electricity market operator", [Online], Available:
23. Li, T. and Shahidehpour, S.M. Price-based unit
commitment: a case of Lagrangian relaxation versus
mixed integer programming", IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, 20, pp. 2015-2025 (2005).
24. Arroyo, J.M. and Conejo, A.J. Optimal response of
a thermal unit to an electricity spot market", IEEE
Trans. Power Syst., 15(3), pp. 1098-1104 (2000).
25. Karimi, M., Shayanfar, H.A., Aghaei, J., and Ahmadi,
A. Mixed integer programming of Security-
Constrained Daily Hydrothermal Generation Scheduling
(SCDHGS)", Scientia Iranica, Transactions D.,
20(6), pp. 2036-2050 (2013).
26. Friend, I. and Blume, M.E. The demand for risky
assets", American Economics Review, 65, pp. 900-922
S. Bazmohammadi et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions D: Computer Science & ... 25 (2018) 3569{3583 3583

Volume 25, Issue 6
Transactions on Computer Science & Engineering and Electrical Engineering (D)
November and December 2018
Pages 3569-3583