Three-valued soft set and its multi-criteria group decision making via TOPSIS and ELECTRE

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Department of Accounting and Financial Management, Seydikemer School of Applied Sciences, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey

2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce a generalization of Molodtsov's approach to soft sets obtained by passing from the classical two-valued logic underlying those sets to a three-valued logic, where the third truth value can usually be interpreted as either non-determined or unknown. This extension of soft set approach allows for more intuitive and clearer representation of various decision making problems involving incomplete or uncertain information. In other words, it is a useful way to analyze soft set based multi-criteria group decision making problems under the lack of information resulting from the inability to determine the data.
In this paper, we introduce the concept of three-valued soft set and its some basic operations and products. We propose the formulas to calculate all possible choice values for each object in the (weighted) three-valued soft sets, and thus calculate their respective decision values. By modifying the TOPSIS and ELECTRE methods to deal with multi-criteria group decision problems, three-valued soft set based decision making algorithms are constructed. To demonstrate the practicality of these algorithms, we address the outstanding examples adapted from the decision problems in real-life. Lastly, some aspects of the efficiency of the proposed algorithms are discussed with computational experiments.

Keywords

References

References
1. Lukasiewicz, J. Philosophische Bemerkungen zu
mehrwertigen systemen des Aussagenkalkulls", Algebra
C.R. Soc. Sci. Lett. Varsovie, 23, pp. 51{57 (1930).
2. Borowski, L. Ed., Selected Works of J. Lukasiewicz,
North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
(1970).
3. Hajek, P., Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer,
Dordrecht (1998).
4. Kleene, S.C., Introduction to Metamathematics, North
Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1952).
5. Skolem, T.H. A set theory based on a certain 3-
valued logic", Mathematica Scandinavica, 8, pp. 127{
136 (1960).
6. Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets", Information and Control, 8,
pp. 338{353 (1965).
7. Pawlak, Z. Rough sets", International Journal of
Computer and Information Sciences, 11, pp. 341{356
(1982).
8. Molodtsov, D. Soft set theory- rst results", Computers
and Mathematics with Applications, 37, pp. 19{31
(1999).
9. Maji, P.K., Biswas, R., and Roy, A.R. Soft set theory",
Computers and Mathematics with Applications,
45, pp. 555{562 (2003).
10. Ali, M.I., Feng, F., Liu, X., et al. On some new operations
in soft set theory", Computers and Mathematics
with Applications, 57, pp. 1547{1553 (2009).
11. Aygun, E. and Kamac, H. Some generalized operations
in soft set theory and their role in similarity
and decision making", Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy
Systems, 36, pp. 6537{6547 (2019).
12. Sezgin, A. and Atagun, A.O. On operations of soft
sets", Computers and Mathematics with Applications,
61, pp. 1457{1467 (2011).
13. Kamac, H. Similarity measure for soft matrices and
its applications", Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy
Systems, 36, pp. 3061{3072 (2019).
14. Zhu, P. and Wen, Q. Operations of soft set revisited",
Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013, 7 pages (2013).
15. Gong, K., Xiao, Z., and Zhang, X. The bijective soft
set with its operations", Computers and Mathematics
with Applications, 60, pp. 2270{2258 (2010).
16. Xiao, Z., Gong, K., Xia, S., et al. Exclusive disjunctive
soft sets", Computers and Mathematics with
Applications, 59, pp. 2128{2137 (2010).
17. Karaaslan, F. and Karatas, S. A new approach to
bipolar soft sets and its applications", Discrete Mathematics,
Algorithms and Applications, 7(4), 1550054
(2015).
18. C etkin, V., Ayguno~glu, A., and Aygun, H. A new
approach in handling soft decision making problems",
Journal of Nonlinear Science and Applications, 9, pp.
231{239 (2016).
19. Khalil, A.M. and Hassan, N. Inverse fuzzy soft set
and its application in decision making", International
Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 11(1),
pp. 73{92 (2019).
20. Abbasimehr, H. and Tarokh, M.J. A novel interval
type{2 fuzzy AHP{TOPSIS approach for ranking reviewers
in online communities", Scientia Iranica, E,
23, pp. 2355{2373 (2016).
21. Adeel, A., Akram, M., and Koam, A.N.A. Group
decision{making based on m{polar hesitant fuzzy
linguistic TOPSIS method", Symmetry, 11(6), 735
(2019).
22. Adeel, A., Akram, M., and Koam, A.N.A. Multi{
criteria decision{making under mHF ELECTRE{I and
HmF ELECTRE{I", Energies, 12(9), 1661 (2019).
23. Akram, M. and Adeel, A. TOPSIS approach for
MAGDM based on interval{valued hesitant fuzzy N{
soft environment", International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,
21(3), pp. 993{1009 (2019).
24. Akram, M., Adeel, A., and Alcantud, J.C.R. Multi{
criteria group decision making using an m{polar hesitant
fuzzy TOPSIS approach", Symmetry, 11(6), 795
(2019).
25. Garg, H. and Kaur, G. Extended TOPSIS method for
multi{criteria group decision{making problems under
cubic intuitionistic fuzzy environment", Scientia Iranica,
E, 25, pp. 1{18 (2018).
26. Jasemi, M. and Ahmadi, E. A new fuzzy ELECTRE
based multiple criteria method for personnel selection",
Scientia Iranica, E, 25, pp. 943{953 (2018).
27. Garg, H., Agarwal, N., and Tripathi, A. Some
improved interactive aggregation operators under
interval{valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment and
its application to decision making process", Scientia
Iranica, E, 24, pp. 2581{2604 (2017).
28. Garg, H. and Kumar, K. A novel correlation coe-
cient of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the connection
number of set pair analysis and its application",
Scientia Iranica, E, 25, pp. 2373{2388 (2018).
29. Gitinavard, G., Mousavi, S.M., Vahdani, B., et al.
A new distance{based decision model in interval{
valued hesitant fuzzy setting for industrial selection
problems", Scientia Iranica, E, 23, pp. 1928{1940
(2016).
30. Peng, X. New operations for interval{valued
Pythagorean fuzzy set", Scientia Iranica, E, 26, pp.
1049{1076 (2019).
E. Akcetin and H. Kamac/Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 28 (2021) 3719{3742 3741
31. Tang, J. and Meng, F. An approach to interval{valued
intuitionistic fuzzy decision making based on induced
generalized symmetrical Choquet Shapley operator",
Scientia Iranica, E, 25, pp. 1456{1470 (2018).
32. Maji, P.K., Roy, A.R., and Biswas, R. An application
of soft sets in a decision making problem", Computers
and Mathematics with Applications, 44, pp. 1077{1083
(2002).
33. Arora, D. and Garg, H. Robust aggregation operators
for multi{criteria decision{making with intuitionistic
fuzzy soft environment", Scientia Iranica, E, 25(2),
pp. 931{942 (2018).
34. Arora, R. and Garg, H. Prioritized averaging/
geometric aggregation operators under the intuitionistic
fuzzy soft set environment", Scientia Iranica,
E, 25, pp. 466{482 (2018).
35. Feng, F. and Li, Y. Generalized uni{int decision
making schemes based on choice value soft sets",
European Journal of Operational Research, 220, pp.
162{170 (2012).
36. Han, B.{H. and Geng, S.{L. Pruning method for
optimal solutions of intm 􀀀 intn decision making",
European Journal of Operational Research, 231, pp.
779{783 (2013).
37. Kamac, H. Selectivity analysis of parameters in soft
set and its e ect on decision making", International
Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 11, pp.
313{324 (2020).
38. Eraslan, S. A decision making method via TOPSIS
on soft sets", Journal of New Results in Science, 8,
pp. 57{71 (2015).
39. Avron, A. and Konikowska, B. Rough sets and 3{
valued logics", Studia Logica, 90(1), pp. 69{92 (2008).
40. C a~gman, N. and Engino~glu, S. Soft set theory and
uni{int decision making", European Journal of Operational
Research, 207, pp. 848{855 (2010).
41. D'ottaviano, I.M.L. The completeness and compactness
of a three{valued  rst{order logic", Revista
Colombiana de Matematicas, 19, pp. 77{94 (1985).
42. Jacquette, D. An internal determinacy metatheorem
for Lukasiewicz's Aussagenkalkuls", Bulletin of the
Section of Logic, 29(3), pp. 115{124 (2000).
43. Ciucci, D. and Dubois, D. A map of dependencies
among three{valued logics", Information Sciences,
250, 162{177 (2013).
44. Cai, M., Li, Q., and Lang, G. Shadowed sets of
dynamic fuzzy sets", Granular Computing, 2, pp. 85{
94 (2017).
45. Pedrycz, W. From fuzzy sets to shadowed sets:
Interpretation and computing", International Journal
of Intelligent Systems, 24(1), pp. 48{61 (2009).
46. Vogel, P., Read, R.W., Hansen, G.M., et al. Congenital
hydrocephalus in genetically engineered mice",
Veterinary Pathology, 49(1), pp. 166{181 (2012).
47. Shih, H.-S., Shyur, H.-J., and Lee, E.S. An extension
of TOPSIS for group decision making", Mathematical
and Computer Modelling, 45, pp. 801{813 (2007).
48. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision
Making: Methods and Applications, New York:
Springer{Verlag (1981).
49. Milani, A.S., Shanian, A., and Madoliat, R. The
e ect of normalization norms in multiple attribute
decision making models: A case study in gear material
selection", Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization,
29(4), pp. 312{318 (2005).
50. Shih, H.-S., Lin, W.-Y., and Lee, E.S. Group decision
making for TOPSIS", Joint 9th IFSA World
Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference,
(2001).
51. Yoon, K.P. and Hwang, C.L., Multiple Attribute
Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publishing
Thousand Oaks, CA (1995).
52. Akram, M., Ilyas, F., and Garg, H. Multi{
criteria group decision making based on ELECTRE
I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information",
Soft Computing, 24, pp. 3425{3453 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500{019{04105{0
53. Alper, D. and Basdar, C. A comparison of TOPSIS
and ELECTRE methods: An application on the
factoring industry", Business and Economics Research
Journal, 8(3), pp. 627{646 (2017).
54. Birgun, S. and Cihan, E. Supplier selection process
using ELECTRE method", IEEE 2010 International
Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering,
Hangzhou, China, pp. 634{639 (2010). DOI:
10.1109/ISKE.2010.5680767
55. Chen, T.{Y. An IVIF{ELECTRE outranking method
for multiple criteria decision{making with interval{
valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets", Technological and
Economic Development of Economy, 22(3), pp. 416{
452 (2016).
56. Devi, K. and Yadav, S.P. A multicriteria intuitionistic
fuzzy group decision making for plant location
selection with ELECTRE method", The International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66,
pp. 1219{1229 (2013).
57. Xu, J. and Shen, F. A new outranking choice method
for group decision making under Atanassov's intervalvalued
intuitionistic fuzzy environment", Knowledge-
Based Systems, 70, pp. 177{188 (2014).
58. Zhong, L. and Yao, L. An ELECTRE I-based multicriteria
group decision making method with interval
type{2 fuzzy numbers and its application to supplier
selection", Applied Soft Computing, 57, pp. 556{576
(2017).
59. Kharal, A. Soft approximations and uni-int decision
making", The Scienti c World Journal, 2014, 7 pages
(2014).