Optimum recovery time for cyclic compression tests on bovine brain tissue

Document Type : Article


1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran



In conducting mechanical tests on the brain tissue, it is preferred to perform multiple tests on the same sample. In this study we investigated the behavior of the bovine brain tissue in repeated compression tests with six recovery periods (10, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 s). Compression tests were performed on cylindrical samples with an average diameter and height of 18.0 mm and 15.0 mm respectively. Two testing protocols were employed: first protocol comprised of experiments with 5, 25 and 125 mm/min loading speed up to 33% strain and the second protocol consisted of tests with 25 and 125 mm/min loading speed up to 17% strain. Each experiment was conducted in two cycles separated by a specific recovery period. Stress-strain data from the first and second cycles were compared using three criteria, namely Normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE), coefficient of variation (R2) and effective height ratio (EHR). The analysis suggests that the optimum recovery period for the first and second protocols are 120 s and 180 s respectively. Moreover, differences between the first and second cycles of medium and high speed tests were found to be smaller compared to the low-speed experiments.


1. Cloots, R.J.H., Van Dommelen, J.A.W., Kleiven, S., and Geers, M.G.D. Multi-scale mechanics of traumatic brain injury: Predicting axonal strains from head loads", Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol., 12(1), pp. 137-150 (2013). 2. Friedman, R., Epstein, Y., and Gefen, A., Traumatic Brain Injury in the Military: Biomechanics and Finite Element Modelling BT - The Mechanobiology and Mechanophysiology of Military-Related Injuries, A. Gefen and Y. Epstein, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 209-233 (2016). 3. Sahoo, D., Deck, C., Yoganandan, N., and Willinger, R. Development of skull fracture criterion based on real-world head trauma simulations using _nite ele2210 M. Mohajery and M.T. Ahmadian/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 26 (2019) 2203{2211 ment head model", J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 57, pp. 24-41 (2016). 4. Clark, J.M., Hoshizaki, T.B., and Gilchrist, M.D. Assessing women's lacrosse head impacts using _nite element modelling", J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 80, pp. 20-26 (2018). 5. Kansal, A.R., Torquato, S., Harsh IV, G.R., Chiocca, E.A., and Deisboeck, T.S. Simulated brain tumor growth dynamics using a three-dimensional cellular automaton", J. Theor. Biol., 203(4), pp. 367-382 (2000). 6. Wong, K.C.L., Summers, R.M., Kebebew, E., and Yao, J. Tumor growth prediction with reaction-di_usion and hyperelastic biomechanical model by physiological data fusion", Med. Image Anal., 25(1), pp. 72-85 (2015). 7. Hrapko, M., Van Dommelen, J.A., Peters, G.W., and Wismans, J.S. The inuence of test conditions on characterization of the mechanical properties of brain tissue", J. Biomech. Eng., 130(3), p. 31003 (2008). 8. Cheng, S., Clarke, E.C., and Bilston, L.E. Rheological properties of the tissues of the central nervous system: A review", Med. Eng. Phys., 30(10), pp. 1318-1337 (Dec. 2008). 9. Miller, K. and Chinzei, K. Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: Experiment and theory", J. Biomech., 30(11-12), pp. 1115-1121 (1997). 10. Miller, K. and Chinzei, K. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension", J. Biomech., 35(4), pp. 483- 490 (2002). 11. Jin, X., Zhu, F., Mao, H., Shen, M., and Yang, K.H. A comprehensive experimental study on material properties of human brain tissue", J. Biomech., 46(16), pp. 2795-2801 (2013). 12. Budday, S., Nay, R., De Rooij, R., et al. Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation", J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 46, pp. 318-330 (2015). 13. Rashid, B., Destrade, M., and Gilchrist, M.D. Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in tension at dynamic strain rates", J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 33(1), pp. 43-54 (2014). 14. Budday, S., Sommer, G., Birkl, C., et al. Mechanical characterization of human brain tissue", Acta Biomater., 48, pp. 319-340 (2017). 15. Bilston, L.E., Liu, Z., and Phan-Thien, N. Linear viscoelastic properties of bovine brain tissue in shear", Biorheology, 34(6), pp. 377-385 (1997). 16. Van Dommelen, J.A.W., Van Der Sande, T.P.J., Hrapko, M., and Peters, G.W.M. Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation: Interregional variation", J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 3(2), pp. 158-166 (2010). 17. Destrade, M., Gilchrist, M.D., Murphy, J.G., Rashid, B., and Saccomandi, G. Extreme softness of brain matter in simple shear", Int. J. Non. Linear. Mech., 75, pp. 54-58 (2015). 18. Labus, K.M. and Puttlitz, C.M. Viscoelasticity of brain corpus callosum in biaxial tension", J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 96, pp. 591-604 (2016). 19. Fung, Y.-C., Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Springer New York (1993). 20. Gefen, A. and Margulies, S.S. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar?", J. Biomech., 37(9), pp. 1339-1352 (2004). 21. Carew, E.O., Barber, J.E., and Vesely, I. Role of preconditioning and recovery time in repeated testing of aortic valve tissues: Validation through quasilinear viscoelastic theory", Ann. Biomed. Eng., 28(9), pp. 1093-1100 (Sep. 2000). 22. Hubbard, R.P. and Chun, K. Mechanical responses of tendons to repeated extensions and wait periods", J. Biomech. Eng., 110, pp. 11-19 (Feb. 1988). 23. Sverdlik, A. and Lanir, Y. Time-dependent mechanical behavior of sheep digital tendons, including the e_ects of preconditioning", J. Biomech. Eng., 124(1), pp. 78-84 (2002). 24. Lanir, Y. and Fung, Y.C. Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin-II. Experimental results", J. Biomech., 7(2), pp. 171-182 (1974). 25. Vogel, H.G. and Denkel, K. In Vivo recovery of mechanical properties in rat skin after repeated strain", Arch. Dermatol. Res., 277(6), pp. 484-488 (1985). 26. Remache, D., Caliez, M., Gratton, M., and Dos Santos, S. The e_ects of cyclic tensile and stressrelaxation tests on porcine skin", J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 77, pp. 242-249 (2018). 27. Prange, M.T. and Margulies, S.S. Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation", J. Biomech. Eng., 124(2), p. 244 (2002). 28. Prevost, T.P., Balakrishnan, A., Suresh, S., and Socrate, S. Biomechanics of brain tissue", Acta Biomater., 7(1), pp. 83-95 (2011). 29. Prevost, T.P., Jin, G., De Moya, M.A., Alam, H.B., Suresh, S., and Socrate, S. Dynamic mechanical response of brain tissue in indentation in vivo, in situ and in vitro", Acta Biomater., 7(12), pp. 4090-4101 (2011). 30. Cheng, S. and Bilston, L.E. Uncon_ned compression of white matter", J. Biomech., 40(1), pp. 117-124 (2007).