Document Type : Article

**Authors**

Department of Mathematics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

**Abstract**

In this study, we propose a method to determine the weight of decision makers (DMs) in group multiple criteria decision making (GMCDM) problems with interval data .Here, we obtain an interval weight for each DM and the relative closeness of each decision from the negative ideal solution (NIS) and the positive ideal solution (PIS) is then computed. In the proposed method, after weighting the decision matrix of each DM, the alternatives are ranked using interval arithmetic. A comparative example together with a real world problem on air quality assessment is given to illustrate our method. Our findings show that the proposed approach is a suitable tool to solve GMCDM problems.

**Keywords**

**Main Subjects**

1. Ishizaka, A. and Nemery P., Multi-Criteria Decision

Analysis: Methods and Software, John Wiley and Sons

(2013).

2. Keeney, R. and Raia, H., Decisions With Multiple

Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeos, New

York: Wiley (1976).

3. Koksalan, M., Wallenius, J., and Zoints, S., Multiple

Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the

21st Century, World Scientic Publishing, New Jersey

(2011).

4. Jacquet-Lagreze, E. and Siskos, J. Assessing a set of

additive utility functions for multiple criteria decision

making", European Journal of Operational Research,

10, pp. 151{164 (1982).

5. Solymosi, T. and Dombi, J. A method for determining

the weights of criteria: the centralized weights", European

Journal of Operational Research, 26, pp. 35{41

(1986).

6. Guitouni, A. and Martel, J.M. Tentative guidelines

to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method",

European Journal of Operational Research, 109, pp.

501{521 (1998).

7. Figueira, J., Salvatore, G., and Ehrgott, M., Eds,

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art

Surveys, New York: Springer Science & Business

Media (2005).

8. Wallenius, J., Dyer, J.S., Fishburn, P.C., Steuer,

R.E., Zionts, S., and Deb, K. Multiple criteria decision

making, multiattribute utility theory: recent

accomplishments and what lies ahead", Management

Science, 54, pp. 1336{1349 (2008).

9. Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., Multiple Attributes Decision

Making Methods and Applications, Berlin, Heidelberg:

Springer (1981).

10. Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.-H. Compromise solution

by MCDM methods", European Journal of Operational

Research, 156(2), pp. 445{455 (2004).

11. Saaty, T.L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical

structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology,

15, pp. 234{281 (1977).

12. Edwards, W. How to use multi attribute utility

measurement for social decision making", IEEE Transactions

on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 7, pp. 326{

340 (1977).

13. Banae Costa, C. and Vansnick, J.-C. MACBETH

- An interactive path towards the construction of

cardinal value functions", International Transactions

in Operational Research, 1, pp. 489{500 (1994).

14. Govindan, K. and Jespen, MB. ELECTRE: A comprehensive

literature review on methodologies and applications",

European Journal of Operational Research,

250, pp. 1{29 (2016).

15. Ishizaka, A. and Siraj, S. Are multi-criteria decisionmaking

tools useful? An experimental comparative

study of three methods", European Journal of Operational

Research, 264(2), pp. 462{471 (2017).

16. Nassereddine, M. and Eskandari, H. An integrated

MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation

systems in Tehran", Transportation Research Part A:

Policy and Practice, 106, pp. 427{439 (2017).

17. Abdollahi, A., Pour-Moallem, N., and Abdollahi, A.

Dynamic negawatt demand response resource modeling

and prioritizing in power markets", Scientia

Iranica, 27(3), pp. 1361{1372 (2020).

S. Saarzadeh et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 27 (2020) 3242{3252 3251

18. Gou, X., Xu, Z., and Liao, H. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic

entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative

queuing method for multiple criteria decision making",

Information Sciences, 388, pp. 225{246 (2017).

19. Ren, Z., Xu, Z., and Wang, H. Dual hesitant

fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision

making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison

method", Information Sciences, 388, pp. 1{16 (2017).

20. Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z., and

Adeli, H. Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making

methods: A review of applications in engineering",

Scientia Iranica., Transactions A, Civil Engineering,

23(1), p. 1 (2016).

21. Chen, L. and Xu, Z. A new prioritized multi-criteria

outranking method: The prioritized PROMETHEE",

Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29(5), pp.

2099{2110 (2015).

22. Yu, X., Xu, Z., and Ma, Y. Prioritized multi-criteria

decision making based on the idea of PROMETHEE",

Procedia Computer Science, 17, pp. 449{456 (2013).

23. Keeney, R.L. and Kirkwood, C.W. Group decision

making using cardinal social welfare functions", Management

Science, 22, pp. 430{437 (1975).

24. Keeney, R.L. A group preference axiomatization with

cardinal utility", Management Science, 23, pp. 140{

145 (1976).

25. Brock, H.W. The problem of 'utility weights' in group

preference aggregation", Operations Research, 28, pp.

176{187 (1980).

26. Ramanathan, R. and Ganesh, L.S. Group preference

aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation

and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages",

European Journal of Operational Research, 79,

pp. 249{265 (1994).

27. Van den Honert, R.C. Decisional power in group decision

making: a note on the allocation of group members

weights in the multiplicative AHP and SMART",

Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, pp. 275{286

(2001).

28. Xu, Z.S. Group decision making based on multiple

types of linguistic preference relations", Information

Sciences, 178, pp. 452{467 (2008).

29. Abootalebi, S., Hadi-Vencheh, A., and Jamshidi, A.

An Improvement to determining expert weights in

group multiple attribute decision making problem",

Group Decision and Negotiation, 27(2), pp. 215{221

(2018).

30. Wang, H.-F., Multicriteria Decision Analysis - From

Certainty to Uncertainty, Ting Lung Book Co, Taipei

(2004).

31. Mahmoudi, A., Sadi-Nezhad, S., and Makui, A.

An extended fuzzy VIKOR for group decisionmaking

based on fuzzy distance to supplier selection",

Scientia Iranica., Transactions E, Industrial Engineering,

23(4), p. 1879 (2016).

32. Hu, J., Chen, P., and Chen, X. Intuitionistic random

multi-criteria decision-making approach based on

prospect theory with multiple reference intervals", Scientia

Iranica., Transactions E, Industrial Engineering,

21(6), p. 2347 (2014).

33. Minatour, Y., Khazaie, J., Ataei, M., and Javadi,

A.A. An integrated decision support system for dam

site selection", Scientia Iranica., Transactions A, Civil

Engineering, 22(2), p. 319 (2015).

34. Yu, X., Zhang, S., Liao, X., and Qi, X. ELECTRE

methods in prioritized MCDM environment", Information

Sciences, 424, pp. 301{316 (2018).

35. Yue, Z. An extended TOPSIS for determining weights

of decision makers with interval numbers", Knowledge-

Based Systems, 24, pp. 146{153 (2011).

36. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh Lot, F., and

Izadikhah, M. An algorithmic method to extend

TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval

data", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 175,

pp. 1375{1384 (2006).

37. Sayadi, M.K., Heydari, M., and Shahanaghi, K.

Extension of VIKOR method for decision making

problem with interval numbers", Applied Mathematical

Modelling, 33, pp. 2257{2262 (2009).

38. Rezaei, J. and Salimi, N. Optimal ABC inventory

classication using interval Programming", International

Journal of Systems Science, 46(11), pp. 1944{

1952 (2015).

39. Dymova, L., Sevastjanov, P., and Tikhonenko, A. A

direct interval extension of TOPSIS method", Expert

Systems with Applications, 40, pp. 4841{4847 (2013).

40. Hafezalkotob, A., Hafezalkotob, A., and Sayadi, M.K.

Extension of MULTIMOORA method with interval

numbers: An application in materials selection",

Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40, pp. 1372{1386

(2016).

41. Liu, W. and Li, L. An approach to determining the

integrated weights of decision makers based on interval

number group decision matrices", Knowledge-Based

Systems, 90, pp. 92{98 (2015).

42. Pamucar, D., Stevic, Z., and Zavadskas, E.K. Integration

of interval rough AHP and interval rough MABAC

methods for evaluating university web pages", Applied

Soft Computing, 67, pp. 141{163 (2018).

43. Feng, Y., Hong, Z., Tian, G., Li, Z., Tan, J., and Hu,

H. Environmentally friendly MCDM of reliabilitybased

product optimisation combining DEMATELbased

ANP, interval uncertainty and Vlse Kriterijumska

Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR)",

Information Sciences, 442, pp. 128{144 (2018).

44. Wanke, P., Kalam Azad, M.A., Barros, C.P., and

Hadi-Vencheh, A. Predicting performance in ASEAN

banks: an integrated fuzzy MCDM-neural network

approach", Expert Systems, 33(3), pp. 213{229 (2016).

3252 S. Saarzadeh et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 27 (2020) 3242{3252

45. Hajek, P. and Froelich, W. Integrating TOPSIS with

interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cognitive maps for

eective group decision making", Information Sciences,

485, pp. 394{412 (2019).

46. Frini, A. and Amor, S.B. MUPOM: A multi-criteria

multi-period outranking method for decision-making

in sustainable development context", Environmental

Impact Assessment Review, 76, pp. 10{25 (2019).

47. Alefeld, G. and Herzberger, J., Introduction to Interval

Computations, New York: Academic Press (1983).

48. Xu, Z.S. On method for uncertain multiple attribute

decision making problems with uncertain multiplicative

preference information on alternatives", Fuzzy

Optimization and Decision Making, 4, pp. 131{139

(2005).

49. Xu, Z.S. Dependent uncertain ordered weighted aggregation

operators", Information Fusion, 9, pp. 310{

316 (2008).

50. Li, D.-F. Relative ratio method for multiple attribute

decision making problems", International Journal of

Information Technology & Decision Making, 8(2) pp.

289{311 (2009).

Volume 27, Issue 6 - Serial Number 6

Transactions on Industrial Engineering (E)

November and December 2020Pages 3242-3252