An effective league championship algorithm for the stochastic multi-period portfolio optimization problem

Document Type : Article

Authors

Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, P.O. Box 14115-111, Iran.

Abstract

The multi-period portfolio optimization models were introduced to overcome the weaknesses of the single-period models via considering a dynamic optimization system. However, due to the nonlinear nature of the problem and rapid growth of the size complexity with increasing the number of periods and scenarios, this study is devoted to developing a novel league championship algorithm (LCA) to maximize the portfolio’s mean-variance function subject to different constraints. A Vector Auto Regression model is also developed to estimate the return on risky assets in different time periods and to simulate different scenarios of the rate of return accordingly. Besides, we proved a valid upper bound of the objective function based on the idea of using surrogate relaxation of constraints. Our computational results based on sample data collected from S&P 500 and 10-year T. Bond indices indicate that the quality of portfolios, in terms of the mean-variance measure, obtained by LCA is 10 to 20 percent better than those of the commercial software. This sounds promising that our method can be a suitable tool for solving a variety of portfolio optimization problems.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
1. Markowitz, H. Portfolio selection", The Journal of
Finance, 7(1), pp. 77{91 (1952).
2. Yoshimoto, A. The mean-variance approach to portfolio
optimization subject to transaction costs", Journal
of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 39(1),
pp. 99{117 (1996).
3. Best, M.J. and Hlouskova, J. Portfolio selection and
transactions costs", Computational Optimization and
Applications, 24(1), pp. 95{116 (2003).
4. Liu, S., Wang, S.Y., and Qiu, W. Mean-varianceskewness
model for portfolio selection with transaction
costs", International Journal of Systems Science,
34(4), pp. 255{262 (2010).
5. Favaretto, D. On the existence of solutions to the
quadratic mixed-integer mean-variance portfolio selection
problem", European Journal of Operational
Research, 176(3), pp. 1947{1960 (2007).
6. Mulvey, J.M. and Shetty, B. Financial planning via
multi-stage stochastic optimization", Computers &
Operations Research, 31(1), pp. 1{20 (2004).
7. Carino, D.R., Myers, D.H., and Ziemba, W.T. Concepts,
technical issues, and uses of the Russell-Yasuda
Kasai nancial planning model", Operations Research,
46(4), pp. 450{462 (1998).
8. Ertenlice, O. and Kalayci, C.B. A survey of swarm
intelligence for portfolio optimization: Algorithms and
applications", Swarm and Evolutionary Computation,
39, pp. 36{52 (2018).
9. Deng, G.-F., Lin, W.-T., and Lo, C.-C. Markowitzbased
portfolio selection with cardinality constraints
using improved particle swarm optimization", Expert
Systems with Applications, 39, pp. 4558{4566 (2012).
10. Woodside-Oriakhi, M., Lucas, C., and Beasley, J.E.
Heuristic algorithms for the cardinality constrained
ecient frontier", European Journal of Operational
Research, 213, pp. 538{550 (2011).
11. Baykasoglu, A., Yunusoglu, M.G., and  Ozsoydan, F.B.
A GRASP based solution approach to solve cardinality
constrained portfolio optimization problems",
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 90, pp. 339{351
(2015).
12. Kalayci, C.B., Ertenlice, O., Akyer, H., and Aygoren,
H. An arti cial bee colony algorithm with feasibility
enforcement and infeasibility toleration procedures for
cardinality constrained portfolio optimization", Expert
Systems with Applications, 85, pp. 61{75 (2017).
13. Bradley, S.P. and Crane, D.B. A dynamic model for
bond portfolio management", Management Science,
19(2), pp. 139{151 (1972).
14. Kallberg, J.G. and Ziemba, W.T. Comparison of
alternative utility functions in portfolio selection problems",
Management Science, 29(11), pp. 1257{1276
(1983).
15. Mulvey, J.M. and Vladimirou, H. Stochastic network
optimization models for investment planning", Annals
of Operations Research, 20(1), pp. 187{217 (1989).
16. Wei, S.Z. and Ye, Z.X. Multi-period optimization
portfolio with bankruptcy control in stochastic market",
Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186(1),
pp. 414{425 (2007).
17. Bertsimas, D. and Pachamanova, D. Robust multiperiod
portfolio management in the presence of
transaction costs", Computers & Operations Research,
35(1), pp. 3{17 (2008).
18. C akmak, U. and  Ozekici, S. Portfolio optimization in
stochastic markets", Mathematical Methods of Operations
Research, 63(1), pp. 151{168 (2006).
19. Li, D. and Ng, W.L. Optimal dynamic portfolio
selection: Multiperiod mean-variance formulation",
Mathematical Finance, 10(3), pp. 387{406 (2000).
20. Zhu, S.S., Li, D., and Wang, S.Y. Risk control over
bankruptcy in dynamic portfolio selection: A generalized
mean-variance formulation", Automatic Control,
IEEE Transactions on, 49(3), pp. 447{457 (2004).
21. Pnar, M.C . Robust scenario optimization based on
downside-risk measure for multi-period portfolio selection",
OR Spectrum, 29(2), pp. 295{309 (2007).
22. Zhang, W.G., Liu, Y.J., and Xu, W.J. A possibilistic
mean-semivariance-entropy model for multi-period
portfolio selection with transaction costs", European
Journal of Operational Research, 222(2), pp. 341{349
(2012).
23. Fang, Y., Lai, K.K., and Wang, S.Y. Portfolio rebalancing
model with transaction costs based on fuzzy
decision theory", European Journal of Operational
Research, 175(2), pp. 879{893 (2006).
24. Sadjadi, S.J., Seyedhosseini, S.M., and Hassanlou, K.
Fuzzy multi period portfolio selection with di erent
rates for borrowing and lending", Applied Soft Computing,
11(4), pp. 3821{3826 (2011).
25. Zhang, P., and Zhang, W.G. Multiperiod mean absolute
deviation fuzzy portfolio selection model with risk
control and cardinality constraints", Fuzzy Sets and
Systems, 255, pp. 74{91 (2014).
844 A. Husseinzadeh Kashan et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 27 (2020) 829{845
26. Yao, H., Li, Z., and Li, D. Multi-period meanvariance
portfolio selection with stochastic interest
rate and uncontrollable liability", European Journal of
Operational Research, 252(3), pp. 837{851 (2016).
27. Berger, A.J., Glover, F., and Mulvey, J.M. Solving
global optimization problems in long-term nancial
planning", Statistics and Operation Research Technical
Report, Princeton University (1995).
28. Berger, A.J. and Mulvey, J.M. Integrative risk management
for individual investors", Worldwide Asset
and Liability Modeling, Cambridge University Press
(1996).
29. Chan, M.C., Wong, C.C., Cheung, B.K.S., and Tang,
G.N. Genetic algorithms in multi-stage asset allocation
system", In Systems, Man and Cybernetics,
2002 IEEE International Conference on, 3, p. 6, IEEE
(October, 2002).
30. Sun, J., Fang, W., Wu, X., Lai, C.H., and Xu,
W. Solving the multi-stage portfolio optimization
problem with a novel particle swarm optimization",
Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), pp. 6727{
6735 (2011).
31. Yan, W., Miao, R., and Li, S. Multi-period semivariance
portfolio selection: Model and numerical solution",
Applied Mathematics and Computation, 194(1),
pp. 128{134 (2007).
32. Zhang, X., Zhang, W., and Xiao, W. Multi-period
portfolio optimization under possibility measures",
Economic Modelling, 35, pp. 401{408 (2013).
33. Liu, Y.J., Zhang, W.G., and Zhang, Q. Credibilistic
multi-period portfolio optimization model with
bankruptcy control and ane recourse", Applied Soft
Computing, 38, pp. 890{906 (2016).
34. Liu, J., Jin, X., Wang, T., and Yuan, Y. Robust
multi-period portfolio model based on prospect theory
and ALMV-PSO algorithm", Expert Systems with
Applications, 42(20), pp. 7252{7262 (2015).
35. Wang, B., Li, Y., and Watada, J. Multi-period
portfolio selection with dynamic risk/expected-return
level under fuzzy random uncertainty", Information
Sciences, 385-386, pp. 1{18 (2017).
36. Li, B., Zhu, Y., Sun, Y., Aw, G., and Teo, K.L. Multiperiod
portfolio selection problem under uncertain
environment with bankruptcy constraint", Applied
Mathematical Modelling, 56, pp. 539{550 (2018).
37. Zhao, Y., and Ziemba, W.T.A. Stochastic programming
model using an endogenously determined worst
case risk measure for dynamic asset allocation", Mathematical
Programming, 89(2), pp. 293{309 (2001).
38. Jacobson, H.I. The maximum variance of restricted
unimodal distributions", The Annals of Mathematical
Statistics, 40(5), pp. 1746{1752 (1969).
39. Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. An ecient algorithm for
constrained global optimization and application to
mechanical engineering design: League championship
algorithm (LCA)", Computer-Aided Design, 43(12),
pp. 1769{1792 (2011).
40. Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. League championship algorithm:
a new algorithm for numerical function
optimization", In 2009 International Conference of
Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition, pp. 43{48,
IEEE (December, 2009).
41. Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. League Championship Algorithm
(LCA): An algorithm for global optimization
inspired by sport championships", Applied Soft Computing,
16, pp. 171{200 (2014).
42. Alimoradi, M.R. and Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. A
league championship algorithm equipped with network
structure and backward Q-learning for extracting stock
trading rules", Applied Soft Computing, 68, pp. 478{
493 (2018).
43. Husseinzadeh Kashan, A., Abbasi-Pooya, A., and
Karimiyan, S. A rig-based formulation and a league
championship algorithm for helicopter routing in o -
shore transportation", Proceedings of the 2nd International
Conference on Data Engineering and Communication
Technology: ICDECT 2017, Volume 828
of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
(2017).
44. Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. A new metaheuristic for
optimization: optics inspired optimization (OIO)",
Computers & Operations Research, 55, pp. 99{125
(2015).
45. Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. An e ective algorithm for
constrained optimization based on optics inspired optimization
(OIO)", Computer-Aided Design, 63, pp.
52{71 (2015).