The use of neural networks for predicting the factor of safety of soil against liquefaction

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Celal Bayar University

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45140 Manisa, Turkey.

Abstract

In this study, the performance of the artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple regression (MR) models to predict the factor of safety, Fs, values of soil against liquefaction was investigated and compared. To achieve this, two earthquake parameters, namely, earthquake magnitude (Mw) and horizontal peak ground acceleration (amax ), and  six soil properties, namely, standard penetration test number (SPT-N), saturated unit weight (γsat), natural unit weight (γn),  fines content (FC), the depth of ground water level from the ground surface (GWL), and the depth of the soil from ground surface (d) varied in the liquefaction analysis and then the Fs value  was calculated for each case by using the Excell program developed and used in the development of the ANN and MR models. The results obtained from the simplified method were compared with those obtained from both the ANN and MR models.It was found that the predicted values from the ANN model matched the calculated values much better than those obtained from the MR model. Moreover, the performance indices such asthedetermination coefficient, variance account for, mean absolute error, root mean square error, and the scaled percent error were computed to evaluate the prediction capacity of the models developed. The study demonstrates that the ANN model is able to predict the Fs value of the soil against liquefaction, quite efficiently, and is superior to the MR model.

Keywords


1. Ishihara, K., Lysmer, J., Yasuda, S., and Hirao, H. Prediction of liquefaction in sand deposits during earthquakes", Soils. Found, 16(1), pp. 1-16 (1976). 2. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. Simplied procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential", J Soil. Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 97(9), pp. 1249-1273 (1971). 3. Farrokhzad, F., Choobasti, A.J., and Barari, A. Liquefaction microzonation of Babool city using arti_cial neural network", J. King. Saud. Univ. Sci., 24(1), pp. 89-100 (2012). 4. Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M. Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils", J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 127(10), pp. 817-833 (2001). 5. Dixit, J., Dewaikar, D.M., and Jangid, R.S. Assessment of liquefaction potential index for Mumbai city", Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, pp. 2759-2768 (2012). 6. Tuskan, Y. The use of neural networks in geotechnical engineering", MSc. Thesis, Celal Bayar University Manisa (In Turkish) (2012). 7. Shahin, M.A., Jaksa, M.B., and Maier, H.R. Arti_cial neural network applications in geotechnical engineering", Aust. Geomech., 36(1), pp. 49-62 (2001). 8. Haykin, S., Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, Macmillan College Publishing Company, New York, USA (1994). 9. Choobbasti, A.J., Farrokhzad, F., and Barari, A. Prediction of slope stability using arti_cial neural network (a case study: Noabad, Mazandaran, Iran)", Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2, pp. 311-319 (2009). 10. Shi, J., Ortigao, J.A.R., and Bai, J. Modular neural networks for predicting settlement during tunneling", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 124(5), pp. 389-395 (1998). 11. Goh, A.T.C. Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks", J. Geotech. Geoenv, 120(9), pp. 1467-1480 (1994). 12. Erzin, Y., Rao, B. H., and Singh, D.N. Arti_cial neural networks for predicting soil thermal resistivity", Int. J. Therm. Sci., 47, pp. 1347-1358 (2008). 13. Guo, Z. and Uhrig, R.E. Use of arti_cial neural networks to analyze nuclear power plant performance", Nucl. Technol., 99, pp. 36-42 (1992). 14. Amezquita-Sanchez, J.P., Valtierra-Rodriguez, M., Aldwaik, M., and Adeli, H. Neurocomputing in civil infrastructure", Sci. Iran., 23(6), pp. 2417-2428 (2016). 15. Opan, M. Determination of the pollution control ow for drought management in a multi-reservoir system", Sci. Iran., 23(6), pp. 2528-2535 (2016). 16.  Ozel, C. and Topsakal, A. Comparison of ANFIS and ANN for estimation of thermal conductivity coe _cients of construction materials", Sci. Iran., 22(6), pp. 2001-2011 (2016). 17. Jeng, D.S., Cha, D.H., and Blumenstein, M. Application of neural network in civil engineering problems", Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in the Internet, Processing, Systems and Interdisciplinary Research (2003). 18. Youd, T.L. and Noble, S.K. Magnitude scaling factors", Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Nat. Ctr. for Earthq. Engrg. Res., State Univ. of New York at Bu_alo, pp. 149-165 (1997). 19. Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F., and Chung, R.M. Inuence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations", J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 111(12), pp. 1425-1445 (1985). 20. Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W. Semi empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes", The 3rd Int. Conf. on Earthq. Geotech. Engrg. (ICEGE), pp. 32-56 (2004). 21. Liao, S.C. and Whitman, R.V. Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand", J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 112(3), pp. 373-377 (1986). 22. Skempton, A.W. Standard penetration test procedures and the e_ects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, aging and overconsolidation", Geotech., 36(3), pp. 425-447 (1986). 23. Robertson, P.K. and Wride, C.E. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test", Can. Geotech. J., 35, pp. 442-459 (1998). 24. Kayen, R.E., Mitchell, J.K., Seed, H.B., Lodge, A., Nishio, S., and Coutinho, R. Evaluation of SPT, CPT, and shear wave-based methods for liquefaction potential assessment using Loma Prieta data", U.S. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER), New York, pp. 177-204 (1992). 25. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, Earthq. Engrg. Res. Inst. Mon., Oakland, Calif. (1982). 26. Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M. Summary report", Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, NCEER-97-0022, December 31 (1997) 27. National Research Council (U.S.)., Liquefaction of Soils During Earthquakes, Committee on Earthquake National Academy Press, pp. 1-7 (1985). 28. Ishihara, K. Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes" , 11th Int. Conf. on Soil. Mech. and Found. Engrg., A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam (1985). 29. Shahin, M.A., Jaksa, M.B., and Maier, H.R., Recent Advances and Future Challenges for Arti_cial Neural System in Geotechnical Engineering Applications, University of Adelaide (2008). 30. Kanibir, A., Ulusay, R., and Aydan, O., Liquefaction- Induced Ground Deformations on a Lake Shore (Turkey) and Empirical Equations for Their Prediction, IAEG 2006, Paper 362 (2006). 31. Erzin, Y., Patel, A., Singh, D.N., Tiga, M.G., Y_lmaz, I., and Srinivas, K. Investigations on factors inuencing the crushing strength of some Aegean sands", Bull. Eng. Geol Environ, 71, pp. 529-536 (2012). 32. Thaker, T.P. and Rao, K.S. Development of statistical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance using MASW technique", Pan- Am CGS Geotech Con. (2011). 33. Erzin, Y. and Cetin, T. The use of neural networks for the prediction of the critical factor of safety of an arti_cial slope subjected to earthquake forces", Scientia Iranica, 19(2), pp. 188-194 (2012). 34. Erzin, Y. and Gul, T.O. The use of neural networks for the prediction of the settlement of one-way footings on cohesionless soils based on standard penetration test", Neural Comput and Applic, 24, p. 891 (2014). 35. Erzin, Y. and Cetin, T. The prediction of the critical factor of safety of homogeneous _nite slopes using neural networks and multiple regressions", Comput. and Geosci, 51, pp. 305-313 (2013). 36. Blake, T.F. Summary report of proceedings of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils", Youd T.L., and Idriss I.M., Eds., Technical Report, NCEER 97-0022 (1997). 37. Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes", Invited paper, 11th Intl. Conf. on Soil Dyn. and Eq. Eng. and 3rd Intl. Conf. on Eq. Geotech. Eng., Jan. 7-9, Berkeley, CA, pp. 32-56 (2004).