Medical Tourism Destinations Prioritization using Group Decision Making Method with Neutrosophic Fuzzy Preference Relations

Document Type : Article

Authors

School of Business, Central South University, Changsha, China

Abstract

Medical tourism has developed rapidly worldwide, especially in Asia, and one of the most important problems facing the patient-tourists is the selection of the optimum destination. In this paper, we present a novel multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM) methodology to evaluate and rank the medical tourism destinations vague based on vague information. A systematic assessment and selection model was constructed by investigating MCGDM problems with neutrosophic fuzzy preference relations (NFPRs). We began by defining NFPRs which allow the patient-tourists lacking information, time or patience, to express their uncertainty and hesitancy about the given preference values. The additive consistency and acceptable consistency for NFPRs were then proposed. Furthermore, the approach to improve the consistency for NFPRs was also validated and a series of aggregation operators were developed. In addition, we presented a systematic MCGDM method using NFPRs (MCGDM-NFPRs) in this paper to rank the medical tourism destinations. Then our proposed approach was applied to two cases considering different kinds of original data to prioritize medical tourism places. Finally, the applicability and feasibility of proposed approach were verified by the comparison with other previous methods, along with some analyses and a comprehensive discussion

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
1. Connell, J. Medical tourism: Sea, sun, sand and
surgery", Tour. Mgt., 27(6), pp. 1093-1100 (2006).
DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2005.11.005
2. Rosensweig, J.A. Medical tourism-health care in the
global economy", Physician Executive, 33(6), pp. 28-
30 (2007).
3. Horowitz, M.D., Rosensweig, J.A., and Jones, C.A.
Medical tourism: globalization of the healthcare
marketplace", Medscape General Medicine, 9(4), p. 33
(2007).
4. Crush, J. and Chikanda, A. South-South medical
tourism and the quest for health in Southern
Africa", Soc. Sci. Med., 124, pp. 313-320 (2015). DOI:
10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.025
5. Thinakorn, N., Johanna, H., and Richard, S. Medical
tourism in Thailand: a cross-sectional study", Bull.
World Health Organ., 94(1), pp. 30-36 (2016). DOI:
10.2471/BLT.14.152165
6. Wongkit, M. and Mckercher, B. Desired attributes
of medical treatment and medical service providers:
a case study of medical tourism in Thailand",
J. Travel Tour. Mark., 33(1), pp. 1-14 (2015).
DOI:10.1080/10548408.2015.1024911
7. Snyder, J., Byambaa, T., Johnston, R., Crooks, V.A.,
Janes, C., and Ewan, M. Outbound medical tourism
from Mongolia: a qualitative examination of proposed
domestic health system and policy responses to this
trend", BMC Health Serv. Res., 15(1), pp. 1-8 (2014).
DOI:10.1186/s12913-015-0849-5
8. Cheng, K.M. Medical tourism: Chinese maternity
tourism to Hong Kong", Curr. Issues Tour., 19(14),
pp. 1479-1486 (2015).
DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2015.1042359
9. Johnston, R., Crooks, V.A., Snyder, J., and Whitmore,
R. The major forces that need to back medical
tourism were - in alignment: championing development
of Barbados's medical tourism sector", Int.
J. Health Serv., 45(2), pp. 334-352 (2015). DOI:
10.1177/0020731414568512
10. Crooks, V.A., Turner, L., Snyder, J., Johnston, R., and
Kingsbury, P. Promoting medical tourism to India:
Messages, images, and the marketing of international
3760 Y. Yang et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 25 (2018) 3744{3764
patient travel", Soc. Sci. Med., 72(5), pp. 726-732
(2011). DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.022
11. Junio, M.M.V., Kim, J.H., and Lee, T.J. Competitiveness
attributes of a medical tourism destination:
The case of South Korea with importanceperformance
analysis", 34(4), pp. 444-460 (2017).
DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2016.1182454
12. Thornton, G. Indian medical tourism industry
to touch $8 billion by 2020", In The Economic
Times (2015). https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/
industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/indianmedical-
tourism-industry-to-touch-8-billion-by-2020-
grant-thornton/articleshow/ 49615898.cms.
13. Sultana, S., Haque, A., Momen, A., and Yasmin,
F. Factors a ecting the attractiveness of medical
tourism destination: An empirical study on Indiareview
article", Iran J. Public Health, 43(7), pp. 867-
876 (2014).
14. Roy, J., Chatterjee, K., Bandhopadhyay, A., and
Kar, S. Evaluation and selection of medical tourism
sites: A rough AHP based MABAC approach", arXiv:
1606.08962 (2016).
15. Eissler, L.A. and Casken, J. Seeking health care
through international medical tourism", Journal of
Nursing Scholarship, 45(2), pp. 177-184 (2013).
16. Blin, J.M. Fuzzy relations in group decision theory",
J. Cybern., 4(2), pp. 17-22 (1974).
DOI: 10.1080/01969727408546063
17. Herrera, F., Herrera Viedma, E., and Chiclana, F.
Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative
preference relations", Eur. J. Oper. Res., 129(2), pp.
372-385 (2001). DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00197-6
18. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., and Herrera Viedma, E.
Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a
multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy
preference relations", Fuzzy Sets Syst., 122(2), pp.
277-291 (2001). DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00004-X.
19. Yu, D. and Li, D.F. Managing interval-valued multiplicative
hesitant fuzzy information in GDM problems",
Sci. Iranica. Trans. E, Ind. Eng., 23(4), pp.
1918-1927 (2016).
20. Khanzadi, M., Nasirzadeh, F., Hassani, S.H., and
Mohtashemi, N.N. An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria
group decision making approach for project delivery
system selection", Sci. Iran. Trans. A, Civ. Eng.,
23(3), pp. 802-814 (2016).
21. Atanassov, K.T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets", Fuzzy Sets
Syst., 20(1), pp. 87-96 (1986). DOI: 10.1016/S0165-
0114(86)80034-3
22. Wang, Z. and Li, K.W. Group decision making with
incomplete intuitionistic preference relations based on
quadratic programming models", Comput. Ind. Eng.,
93, pp. 162-170 (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.01.001
23. Liu, H., Xu, Z., and Liao, H. The multiplicative consistency
index of hesitant fuzzy preference relation",
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 24(1), pp. 82-93 (2016). DOI:
10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2426315
24. Liao, H.C. and Xu, Z.S. Consistency of the
fused intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation in
group intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process",
Appl. Soft. Comput., 35, pp. 812-826 (2015).
DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.04.015
25. Wang, Z.J. and Li, K.W. A multi-step goal programming
approach for group decision making with
incomplete interval additive reciprocal comparison matrices",
Eur. J. Oper. Res., 242(3), pp. 890-900 (2015).
26. Chiclana, F., Ure~na, R., Fujita, H., and Herrera-
Viedma, E., Estimating Unknown Values in Reciprocal
Intuitionistic Preference Relations via Asymmetric
Fuzzy Preference Relations, pp. 66-77, Springer, Berlin
(2015).
27. Ure~na, R., Chiclana, F., Fujita, H., and Herrera
Viedma, E. Con dence-consistency driven group
decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal
intuitionistic preference relations", Knowledge-
Based Syst., 89(C), pp. 86-96 (2015). DOI:
10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.020
28. Xu, Z. Compatibility analysis of intuitionistic fuzzy
preference relations in group decision making", Group
Decis. Negot., 22(3), pp. 463-482 (2013). DOI:
10.1007/s10726-011-9278-y
29. Wang, Z.J., Wang, Y.H., and Li, K.W. An acceptable
consistency-based framework for group Decision Making
with Intuitionistic Preference Relations", Group
Decis. Negot., pp. 1-22 (2015). DOI: 10.1007/s10726-
015-9438-6
30. Wu, J. Consistency in MCGDM problems with intuitionistic
fuzzy preference relations based on an exponential
score function", Group Decis. Negot., 25(2),
pp. 399-420 (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s10726-015-9447-5
31. Zeng, S., Palacios Marques, D., and Zhu, F. A
new model for interactive group decision making with
intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations", Informatica,
27(4), pp. 911-928 (2016).
32. Zhang, Y.B., Li, K.W., and Wang, Z.J. Prioritization
and aggregation of intuitionistic preference
relations: A multiplicative-transitivity-based transformation
from intuitionistic judgment data to priority
weights", Group Decis. Negot., 26(2), pp. 409-436
(2017).
33. Xu, Z. and Cai, X. Group decision making with
incomplete interval-valued intuitionistic preference relations",
Group Decis. Negot., 24(2), pp. 193-215
(2014). DOI: 10.1007/s10726-014-9386-6
34. Jiang, Y., Xu, Z., and Yu, X. Group decision making
based on incomplete intuitionistic multiplicative preference
relations", Inf. Sci., 295, pp. 33-52 (2015). DOI:
10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.043
35. Zhou, W., Xu, Z., and Chen, M. Preference relations
based on hesitant-intuitionistic fuzzy information
and their application in group decision making",
Y. Yang et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 25 (2018) 3744{3764 3761
Comput. Ind. Eng., 87, pp. 163-175 (2015). DOI:
10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.020
36. Wang, Z.J. and Tong, X.Y. Consistency analysis and
group decision making based on triangular fuzzy additive
reciprocal preference relations", Inf. Sci., 361-
362(C), pp. 29-47 (2016).
37. Wang, Z.J. Comments on A note on Applying fuzzy
linguistic preference relations to the improvement of
consistency of fuzzy AHP", Inf. Sci., 372, pp. 539-545
(2016).
38. Wang, Z.J. Geometric consistency based interval
weight elicitation from intuitionistic preference relations
using logarithmic least square optimization",
Fuuz. Optim. Decis. Mak., 14(3), pp. 289-310 (2015).
39. Wang, Z.J. and Zhang, X.Y. A two-stage acceptable
hesitancy based goal programming framework to
evaluating missing values of incomplete intuitionistic
reciprocal preference relations", Comput. Ind. Eng.,
105, pp. 190-200 (2017).
40. Dubois, D.J., Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and
Applications, Academic Press (1980).
41. Zimmermann, H.-J., Fuzzy Set Theory-and Its Applications,
Springer Science & Business Media (2011).
42. Tanino, T. Fuzzy preference relations in group decision
making", In Non-conventional Preference Relations
in Decision Making, pp. 54-71, Springer, Berlin
Heidelberg (1988).
43. Tanino, T. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision
making", Fuzzy Sets Syst., 12(2), pp. 117-131
(1984). DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0
44. Liao, H., Xu, Z.S., and Xia, M.M. Multiplicative
consistency of hesitant fuzzy reference relation and
its application in group decision making", Int. J. Inf.
Technol. Decis. Mak., 13(1), pp. 47-76 (2014). DOI:
10.1142/S0219622014500035
45. Wang, H. and Xu, Z. Some consistency measures
of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations",
Inf. Sci., 297, pp. 316-331 (2015). DOI:
10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.047
46. Rallabandi, L.N.P.K., Vandrangi, R., and
Rachakonda, S.R. Improved consistency ratio
for pairwise comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy
processes", Asia. Pac. J. Oper. Res., 33, pp.
1650020-1650038 (2016).
47. Li, K.W., Wang, Z.J., and Tong, X.Y. Acceptability
analysis and priority weight elicitation for interval
multiplicative comparison matrices", Eur. J. Oper.
Res., 250(2), pp. 628-638 (2016).
48. Wang, Z.J. and Lin, J. Acceptability measurement
and priority weight elicitation of triangular fuzzy
multiplicative preference relations based on geometric
consistency and uncertainty indices", Inf. Sci., 402,
pp. 105-123 (2017).
49. Wang, Z.J. A two-stage linear goal programming
approach to eliciting interval weights from additive
interval fuzzy preference relations", Soft Computing,
20(7), pp. 2721-2732 (2016).
50. Smarandache, F. A unifying eld in logics: Neutrosophic
logic. Neutrosophy, neutrosophic set, neutrosophic
probability and statistics", (fourth edition),
Journal of Molecular Biology, 332(2), pp. 489-503
(2003). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8792
51. Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y., and Sunderraman,
R. Single valued neutrosophic sets", Tech. Sci.
Appl. Math., 17(1), pp. 10-14 (2010).
52. Orlovsky, S. Decision-making with a fuzzy preference
relation", Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1(3), pp. 155-167 (1978).
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90001-5
53. Xu, Z. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application
in group decision making", Inf. Sci., 177(11),
pp. 2363-2379 (2007). DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2006.12.019
54. Wang, Z.J. Derivation of intuitionistic fuzzy weights
based on intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations",
Appl. Math. Model., 37(9), pp. 6377-6388 (2013). DOI:
10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.021
55. Wang, Z., Li, K.W., and Wang, W. An approach to
multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic
fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights",
Information Science, 179(17), pp. 3026-3040 (2009).
56. Hu, J.H., Yang, Y., and Chen, X.H. A novel TODIM
method-based three-way decision model for medical
treatment selection", International Journal of Fuzzy
Systems, 20(4), pp. 1240-1255 (2018).
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-017-0320-3
57. Wang, N.N. and Zhang, H.Y. Probability multivalued
linguistic neutrosophic sets for multi-criteria
group decision-making", Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif.,
7(3), pp. 207-228 (2017).
DOI: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuanti cation.
2017019632
58. Tian, Z.P., Wang, J., Wang, J.Q., and Zhang, H.Y.
Simpli ed neutrosophic linguistic multi-criteria group
decision-making approach to green product development",
Group Decis. Negot., 26(3), pp. 597-627 (2017).
59. Wang, J.Q., Han, Z.Q., and Zhang, H.Y. Multicriteria
group decision-making method based on intuitionistic
interval fuzzy information", Group Decis.
Negot., pp. 1-19 (2014).
60. Sun, R.X., Hu, J.H., Zhou, J.D., and Chen,
X.H. A hesitant fuzzy linguistic projection-based
MABAC method for patients' prioritization", International
Journal of Fuzzy Systems (2017). DOI:
10.1007/s40815-017-0345-7
61. Yang, Y., Hu, J.H., An, Q.X., and Chen,
X.H. Group decision making with multiplicative
triangular hesitant fuzzy preference relations
and cooperative games method ", Int. J. Uncertain.
Quantif., 7(3), pp. 271-284 (2017). DOI:
10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuanti cation.
2017020126.
3762 Y. Yang et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 25 (2018) 3744{3764