Two- and three-dimensional numerical simulations of supersonic ramped inlet

Document Type : Article


Department of Aerospace Engineering, Sharif University, Tehran, Iran


Two Dimensional (2D) and Three Dimensional (3D) numerical simulations of an external compression supersonic ramped inlet for a free stream Mach number of 2 are presented.  Comparison between numerical results and experimental data showed that multi-block structured gird using standard k-ε turbulence model gives acceptable results.  The diffuser shape was then gradually varied to a circular one to encompass the Aerodynamic Interface Plane (AIP).  It is observed that the 3D simulation predicted a more accurate static pressure distribution during the length of supersonic inlet and total pressure distribution at the AIP in comparison with the 2D one. Further, a better estimation of Shock Boundary Layer Interaction (SBLI), shock structure, and turbulent flow is predicted by the 3D simulation. It seems that, even though the 2D simulation scheme is widely used, it is a very weak method with low accuracy while the 3D simulation is more accurate and gives detailed flow field. Therefore; for cases where a detailed flow study along with an accurate prediction of flow parameters as well as the shock structure are required, the 3D numerical simulation must be applied.


Main Subjects

1. Mattingly, J.D. and Von Ohain, H. Elements of
propulsion: gas turbines and rockets", American Institute
of Aeronautics and Astronautics Reston, Va, USA
2. Soltani, M.R. and Sepahi-Younsi, J. Buzz cycle deR.
Askari and M.R. Soltani/Scientia Iranica, Transactions B: Mechanical Engineering 25 (2018) 2198{2207 2207
scription in an axisymmetric mixed-compression air
intake", AIAA Journal, 54(3), pp. 1040-1053 (2015).
3. Seddon, J.M. and Goldsmith, E., Intake Aerodynamics,
Blackwell Science, Ebook (1999).
4. Soltani, M.R., Daliri, A., and Sepahi Younsi, J.
E ects of shock wave/boundary-layer interaction on
performance and stability of a mixed-compression
inlet", Scientia Iranica. Transaction B, Mechanical
Engineering, 23(4), p. 1811 (2016).
5. Goldsmith, E.L. and Seddon, J., Practical Intake
Aerodynamic Design, Amer Inst of Aeronautics (1993).
6. Orme, J.S. and Conners, T.R. Supersonic
ight test
results of a performance seeking control algorithm on
a NASA F-15 aircraft", AIAA Paper, pp. 1994-3210
7. Whitford, R., Design for Air Combat, Janes Information
Group (1987).
8. Loth, E., Jaiman, R., Dutton, C., and White, S.
ap and bleed
ow control for a Mach 2 inlet",
AIAA Paper, pp. 2004-855 (2004).
9. Ran, H. and Mavris, D. Preliminary design of a 2D
supersonic inlet to maximize total pressure recovery",
in AIAA 5th Aviation, Technology, Integration and
Operations Conference, Virginia, pp. 2005-7357 (2005).
10. Mizukami, M. and Saunders, J. Parametrics on 2D
Navier-Stokes analysis of a Mach 2.68 bifurcated rectangular
mixed-compression inlet", 31st Joint Propulsion
Conference and Exhibit (1995).
11. Chang, J., Hu, Q., Yu, D., and Bao, W. Classi-
er utility modeling and analysis of hypersonic inlet
start/unstart considering training data costs", Acta
Astronautica, 69(9), pp. 841-847 (2011).
12. Loth, E., Titchener, N., Babinsky, H., and Povinelli, L.
Canonical normal shock wave/boundary-layer interaction

ows relevant to external compression inlets",
AIAA Journal, 51(9), pp. 2208-2217 (2013).
13. Fisher, S. Three-dimensional
ow e ects in a twodimensional
supersonic air intake", Journal of Propulsion
and Power, 2(6), pp. 546-551 (1986).
14. Bourdeau, C., Carrier, G., Knight, D., and Rasheed,
K. Three dimensional optimization of supersonic inlets",
AIAA Paper, pp. 1999-2108 (1999).
15. Aziz, M.A., Elbanna, H.M., and Abdelrahman, M.M.
Design and optimization of a three dimensional supersonic
intake using the CFD-RC package", In Tenth
International Congress of Fluid Dynamics (2010).
16. Trapier, S., Deck, S., and Duveau, P. Delayed
detached-eddy simulation of supersonic inlet buzz", in
Advances in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling, Springer,
pp. 242-251 (2008).
17. Trapier, S., Duveau, P., and Deck, S. Experimental
study of supersonic inlet buzz", AIAA Journal, 44(10),
pp. 2354-2365 (2006).
18. Gaitonde, D.V. Progress in shock wave/boundary
layer interactions", Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 72,
pp. 80-99 (2015).
19. Jaiman, R.K., Loth, E., and Dutton, J. Simulations of
normal shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction control
using meso
aps", Journal of Propulsion and Power,
20(2), pp. 344-352 (2004).
20. Hamed, A. and Shang, J. Survey of validation data
base for shockwave boundary-layer interactions in supersonic
inlets", Journal of Propulsion and Power, pp.
1991-617-625 (1991).
21. Soltani, M.R., Younsi, J.S., Farahani, M., and Masoud,
A. Numerical simulation and parametric study of a
supersonic intake", Proceedings of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace
Engineering, 227(3), pp. 467-479 (2013).
22. Babinsky, H. and Harvey, J.K., Shock Wave-Boundary-
Layer Interactions, 32, Cambridge University Press
23. Ogawa, H. and Babinsky, H. Shock/boundary-layer
interaction control using three-dimensional bumps
in supersonic engine inlets", in AIAA Paper 46th
Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (2008).