Document Type : Article

**Authors**

Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

**Abstract**

In some processes, quality of a product should be characterized by functional relationships between response variables and a signal factor. Hence the traditional methods cannot be used to find the optimum solution. In this paper, we propose a method which considers two different dispersion effects, i.e. in domain and between replicates variations in the functional responses. Besides, we propose an integral based measure to find the deviation from t

**Keywords**

1. Harrington, E. The desirability function", Industrial

Quality Control, 21(10), pp. 494-498 (1965).

2. Derringer, G. and Suich, R. Simultaneous optimization

of several response variables", Journal of Quality

Technology, 12(4), pp. 214-219 (1980).

3. Del Castillo, E., Montgomery, D.C., and McCarville,

D.R. Modied desirability functions for multiple response

optimization", Journal of Quality Technology,

28(3), pp. 337-345 (1996).

4. Jeong, I.J. and Kim, K.J. Interactive desirability

function approach to multi-response surface optimization",

International Journal of Reliability, Quality and

Safety Engineering, 10(02), pp. 205-217 (2003).

5. Ribardo, C. and Allen, T.T. An alternative desirability

function for achieving 'six sigma' quality", Quality

and Reliability Engineering International, 19(3), pp.

227-240 (2003).

6. Noorossana, R., Tajbakhsh, S.D., and Saghaei, A. An

articial neural network approach to multiple-response

optimization", The International Journal of Advanced

Manufacturing Technology, 40(11-12), pp. 1227-1238

(2009).

7. Mostafa, J.J., Mohammad, M.A., and Ehsan, M. A

hybrid response surface methodology and simulated

annealing algorithm: A case study on the optimization

of shrinkage and warpage of a fuel lter", World Applied

Sciences Journal, 13(10), pp. 2156-2163 (2011).

8. He, Z., Zhu, P.F., and Park, S.H. A robust desirability

function method for multi-response surface optimization

considering model uncertainty", European Journal

of Operational Research, 221(1), pp. 241-247 (2012).

9. Chen, H.W., Xu, H., and Wong, W.K. Balancing

location and dispersion eects for multiple responses",

Quality and Reliability Engineering International,

29(4), pp. 607-615 (2013).

10. Costa, N.R., Lourenco, J., and Pereira, Z.L. Desirability

function approach: A review and performance

evaluation in adverse conditions", Chemometrics and

Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 107(2), pp. 234-244

(2011).

11. Taguchi, G., Taguchi Methods: Signal-to-Noise Ratio

for Quality Evaluation, 1st Ed. 3, Dearborn: American

Supplier Inst. (1991).

12. Miller, A. and Wu, C. J. Parameter design for

signal-response systems: a dierent look at Taguchi's

dynamic parameter design", Statistical Science, 11(2),

pp. 122-136 (1996).

13. Tong, L.I., Su, C.T., and Wang, C.-H. The optimization

of multi-response problems in the Taguchi

method", International Journal of Quality & Reliability

Management, 14(4), pp. 367-380 (1997).

14. Ozdemir, G. and Maghsoodloo, S. Quadratic quality

loss functions and signal-to-noise ratios for a trivariate

response", Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 23(2),

pp. 144-171 (2004).

15. Tong, L.I., Wang, C.H., and Tsai, C.W. Robust design

for multiple dynamic quality characteristics using

data envelopment analysis", Quality and Reliability

Engineering International, 24(5), pp. 557-571 (2008).

16. Fogliatto, F.S. Multiresponse optimization of products

with functional quality characteristics", Quality

and Reliability Engineering International, 24(8), pp.

927-939 (2008).

17. Goethals, P.L. and Cho, B.R. The development of a

robust design methodology for time-oriented dynamic

quality characteristics with a target prole", Quality

and Reliability Engineering International, 27(4), pp.

403-414 (2011).

18. Maghsoodloo, S. and Huang, L.-H. Quality loss functions

and performance measures for a mixed bivariate

response", Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 20(2),

pp. 73-88 (2001).

19. Wu, F.C. Robust design of nonlinear multiple dynamic

quality characteristics", Computers & Industrial

Engineering, 56(4), pp. 1328-1332 (2009).

20. Tong, L.I., Wang, C.H., Houng, J.Y., and Chen, J.Y.

Optimizing dynamic multiresponse problems using

the dual-response-surface method", Quality Engineering,

14(1), pp. 115-125 (2002).

21. Su, C.-T., Chen, M.C., and Chan, H.-L. Applying

neural network and scatter search to optimize parameter

design with dynamic characteristics", Journal of

the Operational Research Society, 56(10), pp. 1132-

1140 (2005).

22. Chang, H.-H. Dynamic multi-response experiments

by backpropagation networks and desirability functions",

Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial

Engineers, 23(4), pp. 280-288 (2006).

23. Chang, H.H. A data mining approach to dynamic

multiple responses in Taguchi experimental design",

Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), pp. 1095-

1103 (2008).

24. Chang, H.H. and Chen, Y.K. Neuro-genetic approach

to optimize parameter design of dynamic multiresponse

experiments", Applied Soft Computing, 11(1),

pp. 436-442 (2011).

25. Storm, S.M., Hill, R.R., and Pignatiello, J.J. A

response surface methodology for modeling time series

response data", Quality and Reliability Engineering

International, 29(5), pp. 771-778 (2013).

26. Zhang, L.Y., Ma, Y.-Z., Zhu, L.-Y., and Wang, J.J.,

A modied particle swarm optimization algorithm

for dynamic multiresponse optimization based on goal

M.H. Bakhtiarifar et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 25 (2018) 2267{2281 2281

programming approach", Proceedings of 2014 IEEE

International Conference on Management Science &

Engineering (ICMSE), Singapore, pp. 160-166 (2014).

27. Gauri, S. Optimization of multi-response dynamic

systems using principal component analysis (PCA)-

based utility theory approach", International Journal

of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(1), pp. 101-

114 (2014).

28. Cui, Q.A. and He, B. Modeling and optimization

of functional response based on kriging model", In

Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on

Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

2015: Core Theory and Applications of Industrial

Engineering 1, E. Qi, J. Shen, and R. Dou, Eds., Ed.

Paris: Atlantis Press, pp. 3-14 (2016).

29. Kang, L. and Albin, S. On-line monitoring when the

process yields a linear", Journal of Quality Technology,

32(4), pp. 418-426 (2000).

30. Stone, M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of

statistical predictions", Journal of the Royal Statistical

Society; Series B (Methodological), 36(2), pp. 111-147

(1974).

31. Derringer, G.C. A balancing act-optimizing a products

properties", Quality Progress, 27(6), pp. 51-58

(1994).

32. Chiao, C.H. and Hamada, M. Analyzing experiments

with correlated multiple responses", Journal of Quality

Technology, 33(4), pp. 451-465 (2001).

33. Cheng, C.-B., Cheng, C.-J., and Lee, E. Neuro-fuzzy

and genetic algorithm in multiple response optimization",

Computers & Mathematics with Applications,

44(12), pp. 1503-1514 (2002).

34. Pasandideh, S.H.R. and Niaki, S.T.A. Multi-response

simulation optimization using genetic algorithm within

desirability function framework", Applied Mathematics

and Computation, 175(1), pp. 366-382 (2006).

35. Salmasnia, A., Baradaran Kazemzadeh, R., and Mohajer

Tabrizi, M. A novel approach for optimization

of correlated multiple responses based on desirability

function and fuzzy logics", Neurocomputing, 91(0), pp.

56-66 (2012).

36. Ouyang, L., Ma, Y., and Byun, J.H. An integrative

loss function approach to multi-response optimization",

Quality and Reliability Engineering International,

31(2), pp. 193-204 (2015).

Volume 25, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4

Transactions on Industrial Engineering (E)

July and August 2018Pages 2267-2281