Influence of grain shape and gradation on the shear behavior of sand mixtures

Document Type : Research Note

Author

University of Gaziantep , Department of Civil Engineering , 27310, Gaziantep , Turkey

Abstract

In this paper, triaxial and cyclic direct shear behaviour of different sand mixtures were investigated by considering variations of shape, size and mixture content. In most studies, investigations on stress-strain properties of soils are carried out using clean sands. However, granular soils in the field may contain a considerable amount of grains in different physical characteristics (i.e., shape, size). Therefore, behaviour of the various sand mixtures in triaxial compression and cyclic direct shear testing apparatuses has received attention in this study. Two different sizes (0.25 mm-0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm-2.0 mm) of sands with distinct shapes (rounded and angular) were tested in triaxial and cyclic direct shear apparatuses. The mixtures of coarser and finer geomaterials were tested in various mix ratio values from 5% to 50% by weight. Based on the examinations during shearing of these materials, it was observed that behavior of the sand mixtures are closely related to the grain shape of host materials as well as fines content in both testing apparatuses, whilst size of the sands was not found to be significantly effective on the results.

Keywords

Main Subjects


References
1. Cabalar, A.F. and Hasan, R.A. Compressional behaviour
of various size/shape sand- clay mixtures with
di erent pore
uids", Engineering Geology, 164, pp.
36-49 (2013).
2. Hyodo, M. and Kim, U.G. Role of nes on cyclic
strength of sands with various kinds of nes", XVIIth
International Conference on Soil Mechanics &
Geotechnical Engineering, 2-3. 10. Alexandria, Egypt
(2009).
3. Monkul, M.M. and Ozden, G. Compression behavior
of clayey sand and transition nes content", Engineering
Geology, 8, pp. 195-205 (2007).
4. Thevanayagam, S. and Mohan, S. Intergranular state
variables and stress-strain behaviour of silty sands",
Geotechnique, 50(1), pp. 1-23 (2000).
5. Yamamuro, J.A. and Wood, F.M. E ect of depositional
method on the undrained behavior and microstructure
of sand with silt", Soil Dynamics and
Earthquake Engineering, 2, pp. 751-760 (2004).
3108 A.F. Cabalar/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 25 (2018) 3101{3109
6. Cabalar, A.F., Dulundu, K., and Tuncay, K. Strength
of various sands in triaxial and cyclic direct shear
tests", Engineering Geology, 156, pp. 92-102 (2013).
7. Cabalar, A.F. Stress
uctuations in granular material
response during cyclic direct shear test", Granular
Matter, 17(4), pp. 439-446 (2015).
8. Cabalar, A.F. and Mustafa W.S. Fall cone tests on
sand-clay mixtures", Engineering Geology, 192, pp.
154-165 (2015).
9. Cabalar, A.F. and Clayton, C.R.I. Some observations
of the e ects of pore
uids on the triaxial behaviour of
a sand", Granular Matter, 12(1), pp. 87-95 (2010).
10. Cabalar, A.F., Akbulut, N., and Isik, H. Transition
nes contents of sand-clay mixtures under one
dimensional compression", Geomechanics from Micro
to Macro, Soga et al. (Eds.), 2, pp. 1311-1316 (2015).
11. Cabalar, A.F. and Akbulut, N. Evaluation of actual
and estimated hydraulic conductivity of sands with
di erent gradation and shape", Springer Plus, 5, p.
820 (2016).
12. Vallejo, L.E. and Mawby, R. Porosity in
uence on
the shear strength of granular material-clay mixtures",
Engineering Geology, 58, pp. 125-136 (2000).
13. Salgado, R., Bandini, P., and Karim, A. Shear
strength and sti ness of silty sand", Journal
of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,
126(5), pp. 451-462 (2000).
14. Georgiannou, V.N., Burland, J.B., and Hight, D.W.
The undrained behavior of clayey sands in triaxial
compression and extension", Geotechnique, 40(3), pp.
431-449 (1990).
15. Naeini, S.A. and Baziar, M.H. E ects of nes content
on steady state strength of mixed and layered samples
of a sand", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,
24, pp. 181-187 (2004).
16. Xenaki, V.C. and Athanasopoulos, G.A. Liquefaction
resistance of sand-silt mixtures: an experimental investigation
of the e ect of nes", Soil Dynamics and
Earthquake Engineering, 23, pp. 183-194 (2003).
17. Thevanayagam, S. Intergrain contact density indices
for granular mixes- II: Liquefaction resistance", Earthquake
Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 6(2),
pp. 135-146 (2007).
18. Monkul, M.M. and Ozden, G. Compression behavior
of clayey sand and transition nes content", Engineering
Geology, 89, pp. 195-205 (2007).
19. Abedi, M. and Yasrobi, S.S. E ects of plastic nes on
the instability of sand", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake
Engineering, 30, pp. 61-67 (2010).
20. Abbireddy, C.O.R., Clayton, C.R.I., and Huvenne,
V.A.I. A method of estimating the form of the ne
particulates", Geotechnique, 59(6), pp. 503-511 (2009).
21. Cabalar, A.F. Applications of the triaxial, resonant
column and oedometer tests to the study of micaceous
sands", Engineering Geology, 112, pp. 21-28 (2010).
22. Cabalar, A.F. The e ects of nes on the behavior of a
sand mixture", Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,
29(1), pp. 91-100 (2011).
23. Clayton, C.R.I., Theron, M., and Vermeulen, N.J.
"The e ect of particle shape on the behavior of gold
tailings", Advances in Geotechnical Engineering: the
Skempton Conference, Thomas Telford, London, pp.
393-404 (2004).
24. Muszynski, M.R. and Vitton, S.J. Particle shape
estimates of uniform sands: visual and automated
methods comparison", J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 24(2), pp.
194-206 (2012).
25. Gilboy, G. The compressibility of sand-mica mixtures",
Proc ASCE 2, pp. 555-568 (1928).
26. Lees, G. A new method for determining the angularity
of particles", Sedimentology, 3, pp. 2-21 (1964).
27. Olson, R.E. and Mesri, G. Mechanisms controlling
the compressibility of clay", J Soil Mech Found Div,
ASCE, 96(SM6), Proceedings Paper 7649, pp. 1863-
1878 (November 1970).
28. Santamarina, J.C. and Cho, G.C. Soil behaviour:
The role of particle shape", The Skempton Conference,
Thomas Telford, London, pp. 604-617 (2004).
29. Terzaghi, K. Earthworks mechanics based on ground
physics" [Erdbaumechanik auf bodenphysikalischer
grundlage], Leipzig/Vienna (1925).
30. Holubec, I. and D'Appolonia, E. E ect of particle
shape on the engineering properties of granular soils",
Evaluation of Relative Density and Its Role in Geotechnical
Projects Involving Cohesionless Soils, ASTM,
STP523, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 304- 318 (1973).
31. Cornfort, D.H. Prediction of drained strength of
sands from relative density measurements", Evaluation
of Relative Density and Its Role in Geotechnical
Projects Involving Cohesionless Soils, Special technical
publication 523, ASTM, West Conshohoken, PA, pp.
281-303 (1973).
32. Cedergen, H.R., Seepage, Dainage, and Flow Nets, 3rd
Ed., Wiley, New York (1989).
33. Kramer, S.L., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering,
Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA (1996).
34. Wadell, H. Volume, shape, and roundness of rock
particles", J. Geol., 40(5), pp. 443-451 (1932).
A.F. Cabalar/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 25 (2018) 3101{3109 3109
35. Krumbein, W.C. Measurement and geological significance
of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles",
J. Sediment. Petrol., 11(2), pp. 64-72 (1941).
36. Powers, M.C. A new roundness scale for sedimentary
particles", J. Sediment. Petrol., 23(2), pp. 117-119
(1953).
37. Youd, T.L. Factors controlling maximum and minimum
densities of sands, evaluation of relative density
and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless
soils", ASTM STP523, West Conshohocken, PA,
pp. 98-112 (1973).
38. Cho, G.C., Dodds, J.S., and Santamarina, J.C. Particle
shape e ects on packing density, sti ness and
strength: Natural and crushed sands", J. Geotech.
Geoenviron. Eng., 132(5), pp. 591-602 (2006).
39. Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B. Soil Mechanics in Engineering
Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 12th
Edition, printed in the United State of America (1962).
40. Vesic, A.S. and Clough, G.W. Behaviour of granual
materials under high stresses", Journal of Soil Mechanics
and Foundations Div., SM3, pp. 313-326 (1968).