Numerical evaluation of geocell-reinforced flexible pavements under traffic loads

Document Type : Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Fasa University, Fasa, Iran

2 Department of C ivil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran


Although several analytical and numerical approaches have been devoted to investigate the shakedown behavior of pavements, shakedown limit of reinforced pavements in particular geocell-reinforced pavements have not been explored yet by load-displacement numerical means. Bahaviour of a typical three layer pavement reinforced with geocell has been investigated under repeated vertical trafic loads by three dimensional finite element elasto-plastic analysis based on shakedown failure and servicability criteria. Three different cases of unreinforced, base layer reinforced and subgrade reinforced pavement were taken into consideratation and subjected to a variety of vehicle loads. Shakedow limit which is is the multiplication of initial  load to shakedown coefficient for each pavement under each load was determined through a trial  and error process. Results indicate that reinforcement of subgarde by geocell significantly  improves the shakedown coefficients of pavements. Reinforcement of base by geocell increases the shakedown coefficient of pavements as well as but not as much as subgrade reinforcement. Results also indicate the sensitivity of shakedown coefficient and shakedown bearing capacity to intensity and shape of the contact area of different loads so that the most extreme case was observed for P=22 ton. Variation of accumulated plastic displacement prior to shakedown state has also been presented and discussed.


Main Subjects


1. Jupsi, S. Experimental validation of the shakedown concept for pavement analysis and design", Ph.D.
Thesis, University of Nottingham (2007).
2. Ravindra, P.S. and Small, J.C. Shakedown analysis of road pavements", The 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods
and Advances in Geomechanics Goa, India, pp. 4432-
4438 (2008).
3. Ravindra, P.S. Shakedown analysis of road pavements - an experimental point of view", Ph.D. Thesis, University
of Sydney (2008).
4. Melan, E. The state of tension of a Mises-Hencky's continuum under load" [Der Spanning Zustand Eines
Mises Henckyschen Kontinuums Bei Verandlichen Belastung],
147, pp. 73-87 (1938).
5. Koiter, W.T. General theorems for elastic-plastic
solids", In Progress in Solid Mechanics, J.N. Sneden,
and R. Hill, Eds., 1, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp.
162-221 (1960).
6. Sharp, R.W. and Booker, J.R. Shakedown of pavement
under moving surface loas", Journal of Transportation
Engineering, 110, pp. 1-14 (1984).
7. Raad, L., Weichert, D. and Najm, W. Stability of
multilayer systems under repeated loads", Transportation
Research Record, 1207, pp. 181-186 (1988).
8. Raad, L., Weichert, D., and Haidar, A. Analysis
of full-depth asphalt concrete pavements using shakeM.
R. Arvin et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 25 (2018) 493{504 503
down theory", Transportation Research Record, 1227,
pp. 53-65 (1989).
9. Collins, I.F. and Cli e, P.F. Shakedown in frictional
materials undermoving surface loads", International
Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,
11, pp. 409-420 (1987).
10. Collins, I.F., Wang, A.P., and Saunders, L.R. Shakedown
in layered pavements under moving surface
loads", International Journal for Numerical and Analytical
Methods in Geomechanics, 17, pp. 165-174
11. Collins, I.F., Wang, A.P., and Saunders, L.R. Shakedown
theory and the design of unbound pavements",
Road and Transport Research, 2(4), pp. 29-38 (1993).
12. Collins, I.F. and Boulbibane, M. Geomechanical analysis
of unbound pavements based on shakedown theory",
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering, ASCE, 126(1), pp. 50-59 (2000).
13. Collins, I.F. and Boulbibane, M. Shakedown under
moving loads with applications to pavement design and
wear", Proceedings of the John Booker Memorial Symposium,
D.W. Smith and J.P. Carter, Eds., University
of Sydney, NSW, Australia (2000).
14. Yu, H.S. and Hossain, M.Z. Lower bound shakedown
analysis of layered pavements using discontinuous
stress elds", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics
and Engineering, 167, pp. 209-222 (1998).
15. Shiau, S.H. Numerical methods for shakedown analysis
of pavements under moving surface loads", Ph.D.
Thesis, The University of Newcastle (2001).
16. Webster, S.L. and Watkins, J.E. Investigation of
construction techniques for tactical bridge approach
roads across soft ground", Technical Rep. No. S-77-1,
U.S. Army Engineer Water ways Experiment Station,
Vicksburg, Miss (1977).
17. Huang, X. and Han, J. Geocell-reinforced granular
ll under static and cyclic loading: a synthesis of
analysis", Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the
SEAGS & AGSSEA, 44(4), pp. 17-23 (2013).
18. Bathurst, R.J. and Karpurapu, R. Large scale triaxial
compression testing of geocell reinforced granular
soils", Geotechnical Testing Journal, 16, pp. 296-303
19. Rajagopal, K., Krishnaswamy, G., and Madhavi
Latha, G. Behaviour of sand con ned with single
and multiple Geocells", Journal of Geotextile and
Geomembranes, 17, pp. 171-184 (1999).
20. Latha, G.M., Nair, A.M., and Hemalatha, M.S. Performance
of geosynthetics in unpaved roads", International
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 4(2), pp.
151-164 (2010).
21. Mhaiskar, S.Y. and Mandal, J.N. Three dimensional
geocell structure: performance under repetive loads",
5th International conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes,
and Related Products, Singapore, pp. 155-158
22. Madhavi Latha, G. and Somwanshi, A. E ect of
reinforcement form on the bearing capacity of square
footings on sand", Geotextiles and Geomembranes,
27(6), pp. 409-422 (2009).
23. Han, J., Yang, X.M., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R.L.,
and Rosen, A. Numerical analysis for mechanisms
of a geocell-reinforced base under a vertical load",
Proceedings of the 4th Asian Regional Conference on
Geosynthetics, June 17-20, Shanghai, China, pp. 741-
746 (2008).
24. Madhavi Latha, G., Dash, S.K., and Rajagopal, K.
Numerical simulation of the behavior of geocell reinforced
sand in foundations", International Journal of
Geomechanics, 9(4), pp. 143-152 (2009).
25. Chazallon, C., Koval, G., Hornych, P., Allou, F., and
Mouhoubi, S. Modelling of rutting of two
pavements with the shakedown theory and the nite
element method", Computers and Geotechnics, 36, pp.
798-809 (2009).
26. Yang, X., Han, J., Leshchinsky, D., and Parsond, R.L.
A three-dimensional mechanistic-empirical model for
geocell reinforced unpaved roads", Acta. Geotechnica.,
8(2), pp. 201-213 (2013).
27. Leshchinsky, B. and Ling, H.I. Numerical modeling
of behavior of railway ballasted structure with geocell
con nement", Geotextiles & Geomembranes, 36(1),
pp. 33-43 (2013).
28. Leshchinsky, B. and Ling, H.I. E ects of geocell
con nement on strength and deformation behavior of
gravel", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 139, pp. 340-
352 (2013).
29. The Asphalt Institute, MS-2, Mix Design Methods for
Asphalt Concrete and Other Hot Mix Types (1984).
30. AASHTO, Guide for Design of New and Rehabilitated
Pavement Structures, American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Ocials, America (2002).
31. Huang, Y.H., Pavement Analysis and Design, Pearson
Education Inc, Second Edition (2004).
33. Thakur, J.K. Experimental study on geocell-reinforced
recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases under
static and cyclic loading", MSc Thesis, University of
Kansas (2010).