Period formula for RC frame buildings considering infill wall thickness and elasticity modulus

Document Type : Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

2 Yildiz Technical University

3 Department of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey


Estimation of a proper fundamental vibration period is an important issue in the process of the design and/or evaluation of a building. Mostly, infill walls are assumed as nonstructural element and ignored in the estimation of the vibration period of a building in terms of stiffness. However, studies showed that infill wall has significant effect on vibration period and should be considered in the estimation of period. Even some proposed equations take into account infill walls in the estimation of period, they do not consider changing of the stiffness of infill walls. In this study, an empirical equation is proposed as a function of building height, elasticity modulus of infill wall and infill wall thickness. For this purpose, building periods were determined with considering different infill wall elasticity modulus, infill wall thicknesses (thus different infill wall stiffness) and building heights. Nonlinear regression analyses were conducted with a comprehensive statistical study. Effect of infill wall elasticity modulus and thickness on vibration period was investigated. Finally, comparisons of proposed equation of this study and previous studies were conducted.


Main Subjects

 1. FEMA 356, Pre-Standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal EmergencyManagement Agency, Washington DC (2000).2. Su, R.K.L., Lee, C.L. and Wang, Y.P. Seismic spectral acceleration assessment of masonry in- lled reinforced concrete buildings by a coecientbased
method", Structural Engineering and Mechanics,
41(4), pp. 479-494 (2012).
3. Furtado, A., Rodrigues, H. and Ar^ede, A. Modelling
of masonry in ll walls participation in the seismic behavior
of RC buildings using openSees", International
Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 7(2), pp.
117-127 (2015).
4. Rodrigues, H., Varum, H. and Costa, A. Simpli ed
macro-model for in ll masonry panels", Journal of
Earthquake Engineering, 14(3), pp. 390-416 (2010).
5. Smyrou, E., Blandon, C., Antoniou, S., Pinho, R. and
Crisafulli, F., Implementation and veri cation of a
masonry panel model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of
in lled RC frames", Bulletin Earthquake Engineering,
9(6), pp. 1519-1534 (2011).
6. Cavaleri, L., Fossetti, M. and Papia, M. In lled
frames: developments in the evaluation of cyclic behaviour
under lateral loads", Structural Engineering
and Mechanics, 21(4), pp. 469-494 (2005).
7. Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. and Kanapitsas, G. Evaluation
of fundamental period of low-rise and mid-rise reinforced
concrete buildings", Earthquake Engineering
and Structural Dynamics, 42(11), pp. 1599-1616
8. Papia, M., Cavaleri, L. and Fossetti, M. In lled
frames: developments in the evaluation of the sti -
ening e ect of in lls", Structural Engineering and
Mechanics, 16(6), pp. 675-693 (2003).
9. Asteris, P.G., Trapani, F.D. and Cavaleri, L. Parameters
a ecting the fundamental period of in lled RC
frame structures", Earthquakes and Structures, 9(5),
pp. 999-1028 (2015).
10. Fiorato, A.E., Sozen, M.A. and Gamble, W.L., An
Investigation of the Interaction of Reinforced Concrete
Frames with Masonry Filler Walls, Report No. UILUENG
70-100, University of Illinoi, Urbana-Champaign,
IL (1970).
11. Zarnic, R. and Tomazevic, M. An experimentally
obtained method for evaluation of the behaviour of
masonry in lled RC frames", Proceedings of the 9th
World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Kyoto
12. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. Period formulas for
moment-resisting frame buildings", Journal of Structural
Engineering, 123(11), pp. 1454-1461 (1997).
13. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. Period formulas for
concrete shear wall buildings", Journal of Structural
Engineering, 124(4), pp. 426-433 (1998).
14. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. Building period formulas
for estimating seismic displacements", Earthquake
Spectra, 16(2), pp. 533-536 (2000).
15. Panagiotakos, T.B. and Fardis, M.N. Deformationcontrolled
earthquake resistant design of RC buildings",
Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3(4), pp.
495-518 (1999).
16. Al-Chaar, G.K. and Lamb, G.E., Design of Fiber-
Reinforced Polymer Materials for Seismic Rehabilitation
of In lled Concrete Structures, US Army Corps
of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development
Center, ERDC/CERL TR-02-33 (2002).
17. Amanat, K.M. and Hogue, E. A rationale for determining
the natural period of RC buildings frames
having in ll", Engineering Structures, 28(4), pp. 495-
502 (2006).
18. Celep, Z. and Gencoglu, M. E ect of the in ll walls on
the behaviour of the concrete structures of frame type
subjected to earthquake loading", 5th National Conference
on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul (2003).
128 A. Kocak et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 25 (2018) 118{128
19. Crowley, H. and Pinho, R. Period-height relationship
for existing European reinforced concrete buildings",
Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(S.I.1), pp. 93-
119 (2004).
20. Budak, A. E ect of the in ll walls on the building
earthquake loads", 7th International Congress on Advances
in Civil Engineering, Istanbul (2006).
21. Guler, H., Yuksel, E., Celik, M. and Altan, M.
Fundamental periods of RC framed buildings having
in ll walls", 7th International Congress on Advances
in Civil Engineering, Istanbul (2006).
22. Guler, H., Yuksel, E. and Kocak, A. Estimation of
the fundamental vibration period of existing RC buildings
in Turkey", Utilizing Ambient Vibration Records,
Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(S2), pp. 140-
150 (2008).
23. Oliveira, C.S. and Navarro, M. Fundamental periods
of vibration of RC buildings in Portugal from insitu
experimental and numerical techniques", Bulletin
Earthquake Engineering, 8, pp. 609-642 (2010).
24. Panzera, F., Lombardo, G. and Muzzetta, I. Evaluation
of building dynamic properties through in
situ experimental techniques and 1D modeling: the
example of Catania Italy", Physics and Chemistry of
the Earth, 63, pp. 136-146 (2013).
25. Ditommasso, R., Vona, M., Gallipoli, M.R. and
Mucciarelli, M. Evaluation and considerations about
fundamental periods of damaged reinforced concrete
buildings", Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,
13(7), pp. 1903-1912 (2013).
26. Pan, T.C., Goh, K.S. and Megawati, K. Empirical
relationships between natural vibration period and
height of a buildings in Singapore", Earthquake Engineering
and Structural Dynamics, 43(3), pp. 449-465
27. NEHRP, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic
Regulations for New Buildings, Building Seismic
Safety Council, Washington DC (1994).
28. UBC, Uniform Building Code, Structural Design Requirements
29. EC8, Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake
Resistance, European Standard, prEn 1998-1 (2003).
30. TSC 2007, Turkish Code for Buildings in Seismic
Zones, The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement,
Ankara, Turkey (2007).
31. Kocak, A. and Yildirim, M.K. E ects of in ll wall
ratio on the period of reinforced concrete framed
buildings", Advances in Structural Engineering, 14(5),
pp. 731-743 (2011).
32. Polyakov, S.V., On the Interaction Between Masonry
Filler Walls and Enclosing Frame When Loaded in the
Plane of the Wall, Earthquake Engineering Research
Institute (EERI), San Francisco, pp. 36-42 (1960).
33. Ersin, U.D. Tiny vibration measurements and integration
of in ll walls to the mechanical model", MSC
Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
34. SAP 2000, Computers and Structure Inc., Ver: 14.2.2
35. Kocak, A., Zengin, B., Eyyubov, C. and Toydemir,
B. E ect of the in ll wall irregularities in basement
to structure behavior in RC buildings", Scienti c-
Technical Progress in Construction and Architecture,
Baku (2014).
36. STATISTICA, StatSoft Inc., (2001).
37. TSC 1998, Turkish Code for Buildings in Seismic
Zones, The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement,
Ankara, Turkey, (1998).