Soil-structure interaction response considering drift analysis due to three orthogonal components of near-field ground motions

Document Type : Article

Authors

School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Soil-structure interaction analysis is one of the most challenging problems in the field of structural engineering. In this paper, two aspects less discussed in the literature, namely: (ⅰ) the effect of considering all three components of near-field earthquake excitations instead of just one horizontal component, and (ⅱ) elimination of the part of inter-story drifts caused by the foundation rocking, have been investigated. Theoretical aspects of both phenomena have been considered, and useful considerations have been proposed. To provide a more comprehensive description of the suggested modifications, the seismic behavior of a 15-story steel moment-resisting frame building subjected to four near-field earthquake excitations has been studied. To that end, 3D nonlinear time-history analysis was conducted using ABAQUS finite element software. The structure is supported by a shallow raft foundation on soft-clayey soil. The results indicate that the two mentioned points are of prime importance and should be considered in the soil-structure interaction analysis due to near-field excitations to evaluate the seismic structural responses more accurately.

Keywords


  1. References:

    1. Mylonakis, G. and Gazetas, G. “Seismic soil-structure interaction: Beneficial or detrimental?”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4(3), pp. 277-301 (2000).
    2. Galal, K. and Naimi, M. “Effect of soil conditions on the response of reinforces concrete tall structures to near-fault earthquakes”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 17(3), pp. 541-562 (2008).
    3. Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. “Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction”, International Journal of Geomechanics, 13(4), pp. 409–420 (2013).
    4. Anand, V. and Satish Kumar, S.R. “Seismic soil-structure interaction: A state-of-the-art review”, Structures, 16, pp. 317-326 (2018).
    5. Jia, F., Jianwen, L., and Zhenning, B. “Model errors caused by rigid foundation assumption in soil structure interaction: a comparison of responses of a soil structure flexible foundation system and a rigid foundation system”, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19, pp. 77–99 (2021).
    6. Jabini Asli, S., Saffari, H., Zahedi, M.J., et al. “Comparing the performance of substructure and direct methods to estimate the effect of SSI on seismic response of mid-rise structures”, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15(1), pp. 81-94 (2021).
    7. Rajeev, P. and Tesfamariam, S. “Seismic fragilities of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with consideration of soil structure interaction”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 40, pp. 78-86 (2012).
    8. Minasidis, G., Hatzigeorgiou, G.D., and Beskos, D.E. “SSI in steel frames subjected to near-fault earthquakes”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 66, pp. 56-68 (2014).
    9. Abdel Raheem, S.E., Ahmed, M.M., and Alazrak, T.M.A. “Evaluation of soil–foundation–structure interaction effects on seismic response demands of multi-story MRF buildings on raft foundations”, International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 7(1), pp. 11-30 (2015).
    10. Behnamfar, F. and Banizadeh, M. “Effects of soil–structure interaction on distribution of seismic vulnerability in RC structures”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 80, pp. 73-86 (2016).
    11. Tahghighi, H. and Rabiee, M. “Influence of foundation flexibility on the seismic response of low-to-mid-rise moment-resisting frame buildings”, Scientia Iranica, 24(3), pp. 979-992 (2017).
    12. Shakib, H. and Homaei, F. “Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of the soil-structure interaction effect on seismic response of mid-rise setback steel buildings”, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15, pp. 2827-2851 (2017).
    13. Deng, H.Y., Jin, X.Y., and Gu, M. “A simplified method for evaluating the dynamic properties of structures considering soil–pile-structure interaction”, International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 18(6), 1871005 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455418710050
    14. Asadi-Ghoozhdi, H. and Attarnejad, R. “The effect of nonlinear soil–structure interaction on the ductility and strength demands of vertically irregular structures”, International Journal of Civil Engineering, 18, pp. 1209-1228 (2020).
    15. Far, H. “Advanced computation methods for soil-structure interaction analysis of structures resting on soft soils”, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 13(4), pp. 352-359 (2019).
    16. Borja, R.I., Chao, H.Y., Montáns, F.J., et al. “SSI effects on ground motion at Lotung LSST site”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(9), pp. 760-770 (1999).
    17. Mirhashemian, P., Khaji, N., and Shakib, H. “Soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis using a hybrid spectral element/finite element (SE/FE) approach”, Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (JSEE), 11(2), pp. 83-95 (2009).
    18. Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. “Lateral seismic response of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction effects”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 45(3), pp. 311-321 (2013).
    19. Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. “An empirical relationship to determine lateral seismic response of mid-rise building frames under influence of soil–structure interaction”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23(7), pp. 526-548 (2014).
    20. Hokmabadi, A.S. and Fatahi, B. “Influence of foundation type on seismic performance of buildings considering soil–structure interaction”, International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 16(8), 1550043 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455415500431
    21. Nguyen, Q.V., Fatahi, B., and Hokmabadi, A.S. “The effects of foundation size on the seismic performance of buildings considering the soil-foundation-structure interaction”, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 58(6), pp. 1045-1075 (2016).
    22. Nguyen, Q.V., Fatahi, B., and Hokmabadi, A.S. “Influence of size and load-bearing mechanism of piles on seismic performance of buildings considering soil–pile–structure interaction”, International Journal of Geomechanics, 17(7), 04017007 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000869
    23. Shahbazi, S., Khatibinia, M., Mansouri, I., et al. “Seismic evaluation of special steel moment frames subjected to near-field earthquakes with forward directivity by considering soil-structure interaction effects”, Scientia Iranica, 27(5), pp. 2264-2282 (2020).
    24. González Acosta, J.L., Vardon, P.J., and Hicks, M.A. “Study of landslides and soil-structure interaction problems using the implicit material point method”, Engineering Geology, 285, 106043 (2021).
    25. Phuor, T., Harahap, I.S.H., Ng, C.Y., et al. “Development of the skew boundary condition for soil-structure interaction in three-dimensional finite element analysis”, Computers and Geotechnics, 137, 104264 (2021).
    26. Longo, M., Sousamli, M., Korswagen, P.A., et al. “Sub-structure-based ‘three-tiered’ finite element approach to soil-masonry-wall interaction for light seismic motion”, Engineering Structures, 245, 112847 (2021).
    27. Abdollahiparsa, H., Homami, P., and Khoshnoudian, F. “Effect of vertical component of an earthquake on steel frames considering soil-structure interaction”, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(7), pp. 2790-2801 (2016).
    28. Standard No. 2800, “Iranian code of practice for seismic resistance design of buildings”, 4th Ed, Ministry of Road, Housing and Urban Development, Tehran, (2014).
    29. Rahvar, “Geotechnical investigation and foundation design report of Mahshahr train station”, P.O. Rahvar Pty Ltd, Iran Railway Authority, Mahshar, (2006).
    30. EN 1993-1-5: Eurocode 3, “Design of steel structures - Part 1-5: General rules – Plated structural elements”, (2006).
    31. Shing, B.P. and Tanabe, T. “Modeling of inelastic behavior of RC structures under seismic loads”, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), (2001).
    32. Chopra, A.K. “Dynamics of Structures”, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (2007).
    33. Kaklamanos, J. “Quantifying uncertainty in earthquake site response models using the KiK-net database”, Dissertation, Tufts University, (2012).
    34. Kaklamanos, J., Dorfmann, L., and Baise, L.G. “A simple approach to site-response modeling: the overlay concept”, Seismological Research Letters, 86(2A), pp. 413-423 (2015).
    35. Dawson, E., Roth, W., and Su, B. “3-D Masing behavior of a parallel Iwan model”, Second International Conference on Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering, Chengdu, China, (2013).
    36. Stokoe, K.H., Darendeli, M.B., Andrus, R.D., et al. “Dynamic soil properties: Laboratory, field and correlation studies”, Second International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, (1999).
    37. Sun, J., Golesorkhi, R., and Seed, H.B. “Dynamic moduli and damping ratio for cohesive soils”, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, (1988).
    38. ABAQUS, Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., USA, (2012).
    39. Hokmabadi, A.S. “Effect of dynamic soil-pile-structure interaction on seismic response of mid-rise moment resisting frames”, Dissertation, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), (2014).
    40. Rayhani, M.H.T. and El Naggar, M.H. “Numerical modeling of seismic response of rigid foundation on soft soil”, International Journal of Geomechanics, 8(6), pp. 336-346 (2008).
    41. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Design Manual 7.02, “Foundation & earth structures”, Alexandria, Virginia, (1986).
    42. PEER, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research center strong motion database, (2014). http://peer.berkeley.edu
    43. Zhang, L. and Liu, H. “Seismic response of clay-pile-raft-superstructure systems subjected to far-field ground motions”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 101, pp. 209-224 (2017).
    44. Zhai, P., Zhao, P., Lu, Y., et al. “Seismic fragility analysis of buildings based on double-parameter damage models considering soil-structure interaction”, Advances in Materials Sciences and Engineering, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4592847
    45. Oz, I., Senel, S.M., Palanci, M., et al. “Effect of soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of existing low and mid-rise RC buildings”, Applied Sciences, 10(23), (2020). https://doi:10.3390/app10238357
    46. Aviram, A., Stojadinovic, B., and Kiureghian, A.D. “Performance and reliability of exposed column base plate connections for steel moment-resisting frames”, PEER Report 2010/107, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California Berkeley, (2010).
    47. Zareian, F. and Kanvinde, A. “Effect of column-base flexibility on the seismic response and safety of steel moment-resisting frames”, Earthquake Spectra, 29(4), pp. 1537-1559 (2013).