Effect of structural uncertainties on seismic performance of moment frame rehabilitated with steel shear wall

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Department of Earthquake Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

2 Department of Structural Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract

In performance-based engineering, conservatism in acceptance criteria at structural performance levels has increased the cost of retrofitting. When simulating structure response in the presence of uncertainties, seismic demand and structural capacity cannot be expressed certainly, though the possible range of these can be predicted. In the seismic rehabilitation of structures, uncertainties have been studied on existing structures and rehabilitation guidelines have been implemented on these uncertainties by reliability index. Adding a secondary system to rehabilitate existing structure may increase uncertainties and may be effective for results of reliability. Therefore, in this study, reliability of rehabilitated a structure with steel shear wall has been discussed with the aim of quantifying uncertainties. Also, the parametric study of reliability index has been performed on probabilistic variables considered for steel shear wall. The selected structure is a three-storey structure of SAC steel moment frame, which was rehabilitated by steel shear wall. For modeling and analyzing the structure, OpenSees software was used. The structure was subject to incremental dynamic analysis before and after of rehabilitation, with probabilistic variables considered for steel shear wall.

Keywords

References

  1.     Siahos, G. and Dritsos, S. “Procedural assumption comparison for old buildings via pushover analysis including the ASCE 41 update”, Earthquake Spectra, 26(1), pp. 187-208 (2010).

https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3272266.

  1.     Acun, B. and Sucuoglu, H. “Performance of reinforced concrete columns designed for flexure under severe displacement cycles”, ACI Structural Journal, 107(3) (2010).
  2.     Acun, B. and Sucuoglu, H. “Evaluation of the performance limit states of reinforced concrete columns in view of experimental observations”, Teknik Dergi, 22(3), pp. 5523-5541 (2011).
  3.     Ricci, P., Verderame, G.M. and Manfredi, G. “ASCE/SEI 41 provisions on deformation capacity of older-type reinforced concrete columns with plain bars”, Structural Engineering, 139(12), p.  04013014 (2013).

http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000701.

  1.     Hacking, I. “The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference”, Cambridge University Press (2006).
  2.     Zareian, F. and Krawinkler, H. “Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(13), pp. 1901-1914 (2007).

https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.702.

  1.    Dolsek, M. “Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(6), pp. 805-825 (2009).

https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.869.

  1.    Vamvatsikos, D. and Fragiadakis, M. “Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 39(2), pp. 141-163 (2010).  

https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.935.

  1.    Vamvatsikos, D. “Seismic performance uncertainty estimation via IDA with progressive accelerogram-wise latin hypercube sampling”, Structural Engineering, 140(8), p. A4014015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001030.
  2. Kaveh, A., Massoudi, M.S. and Bagha, M.G. “Structural reliability analysis using charged system search algorithm”, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 38, pp. 439-448 (2014).‏
  3. Mathiasson, A. and Medina, R. “Seismic collapse assessment of a 20-story steel moment-resisting frame structure”, Buildings, 4(4), pp. 806-822 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings4040806.

  1. Torabian, S. and Taghikhany, T. “Assessment of seismic collapse uncertainties of steel moment resisting frames by means of single degree of freedom systems”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 228(5), pp. 504-517, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006x14535760.
  2. Kazantzi, A.K., Vamvatsikos, D. and Lignos, D.G. “Seismic performance of a steel moment-resisting frame subject to strength and ductility uncertainty”, Engineering Structures, 78, pp. 69-77 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.044.

  1. Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. “Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading”, Structural Engineering, 137(11), pp. 1291-1302 (2011).

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.

  1. Tubaldi, E., Ragni, L. and Dall'Asta, A. “Probabilistic seismic response assessment of linear systems equipped with nonlinear viscous dampers”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(1), pp. 101-120 (2015).

https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2461.

  1. Asgarian, B. and Ordoubadi, B. “Effects of structural uncertainties on seismic performance of steel moment resisting frames”, Constructional Steel Research, 120, pp. 132-142 (2016).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.031 .

  1. Hajirasouliha, I., Pilakoutas, K. and Mohammadi, R.K. “Effects of uncertainties on seismic behavior of optimum designed braced steel frames”, Steel and Composite Structures, 20(2), pp. 317-335 (2016).‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.317.
  2. Zhang, H., Shayan, S., Rasmussen, K.J. and Ellingwood, B.R. “System-based design of planar steel frames, I: Reliability framework”, Constructional Steel Research, 123, pp. 135-143 (2016).

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.05.004.

  1. Holicky, M., Retief, J.V. and Sykora, M. “Assessment of model uncertainties for structural resistance”, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 45, pp. 188-197 (2016).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.09.008.

  1. Dyanati, M., Huang, Q. and Roke, D. “Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centering concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties”, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(5), pp. 537-553 (2017).

https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1173070.

  1. Jiang, L. and Ye, J. “Seismic risk assessment of a 2-storey steel-sheathed CFS building considering different sources of uncertainty”, Structures, 16, pp. 347-357 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.010.  
  2. Norouzi, A.H. and Gerami, M. “Quantifying response variability of steel moment frames due to seismic uncertainties”, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(4), pp. 503-514 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00115-3.

  1. Piluso, V., Pisapia, A., Castaldo, P. and Nastri, E. “Probabilistic Theory of Plastic Mechanism Control for steel moment resisting frames”, Structural Safety, 76, pp. 95-107 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.003.

  1. FEMA, “Quantification of building seismic performance factors”, Report No. FEMA P695, Redwood city,CA, Applied Technology Council (2009).
  2. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. “Seismic demands for the performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures”, Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University (1998). ‏
  3. McKenna, F., Fenves, G.L. and Scott, M.H. “Open system for earthquake engineering simulation”, University of California, Berkeley, CA (2000).‏

www.opensees.berkeley.edu.

  1. SEAOC Seismology Committee, “Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary”, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA (1999).
  2. Whittaker, A., et al. “Selecting and scaling earthquake ground motions for performing response-history analyses”, No. Grant/Contract Reports (NISTGCR)-11-917-15 (2011).
  3. Council, B.S.S. “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings”, Report FEMA-356, Washington, DC (2000).‏
  4. Ellingwood, B.R. and Kinali, K. “Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment”, Structural Safety, 31(2), pp. 179-187 (2009).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.001.

  1. Kinali, K. and Ellingwood, B.R. “Seismic fragility assessment of steel frames for consequence-based engineering: A case study for Memphis, TN”. Engineering Structures, 29(6), pp. 1115-1127 (2007).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.017.

  1. Sadowski, A.J. and Rotter, J.M. “Solid or shell finite elements to model thick cylindrical tubes and shells under global bending”, Mechanical Sciences, 74, pp. 143-153 (2013).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.05.008.

  1. Sadowski, A.J., Rotter, J.M., Reinke, T. and Ummenhofer, T. “Statistical analysis of the material properties of selected structural carbon steels”, Structural Safety, 53, pp. 26-35 (2015).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.12.002.

  1. Porter, K.A., Beck, J.L. and Shaikhutdinov, R.V. “Investigation of sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables for the Van Nuys testbed”, PEER Report 2002/03 (2002).
  2. Melchers, R.E. “Structural reliability analysis and prediction”, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1999).
  3. JCSS, J. “Probabilistic model code”, Joint Committee on Structural Safety (2001).
  4. Hossain, M.R., Ashraf, M. and Padgett, J.E. “Risk-based seismic performance assessment of yielding shear panel device”, Engineering Structures, 56, pp. 1570-1579 (2013).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.032.

 

Scientia Iranica
Volume 28, Issue 4
Transactions on Civil Engineering (A)
July and August 2021
Pages 2010-2022

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 August 2019
  • Revise Date: 10 June 2020
  • Accept Date: 07 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics