Numerical analysis of pressures on rigid structures using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method

Document Type : Article

Authors

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geodesy, University of Split, Matice Hrvatske 15, Split, Croatia

10.24200/sci.2020.22052

Abstract

The paper presents a numerical analysis of hydrodynamic pressures on rigid structures caused by dynamic base excitation. First, the model for the fluid simulation, based on the numerical approach called the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method, is presented. Then, the described model is used to calculate the pressures on rigid structures. In the performed analysis, the structures of various geometries (a rectangular tank with vertical sides, rectangular tanks with one inclined side of constant slope and a cylindrical tank) are exposed to simple harmonic horizontal base excitations. The obtained hydrodynamic pressures on the sides of the tanks are compared with analytical and other numerical solutions.

Keywords


References
1. Westergaard, H.M. Water pressures on dams during earthquakes", Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 98(1835), pp. 418{433 (1933).
2. Zangar, C.N. Hydrodynamic pressure on dams during to horizontal earthquakes", Proc. Soc Experimental Stress Analysis, 10, pp. 93{102 (1953).
3. Housner, G.W. Dynamic pressures on accelerated
uid containers", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 47(1), pp. 15{35 (1957).
4. Chopra, A.K., Hydrodynamic Pressures on Dams During Earthquakes, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Report No. 66{2, pp. 1{14 (1966).
5. Chwang, A.T. Hydrodynamic pressures on sloping dams during earthquakes: Part 2, exact theory",
Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 87(2), pp. 342{348 (1978).
6. Chwang, A.T. Nonlinear hydrodynamic pressure on an accelerating plate", The Physics of Fluids, 26(2), pp. 383{387 (1983).
7. Seghir, A., Tahacourt, A., and Bonnet, G. Coupling FEM and symmetric BEM for dynamic interaction of dam-reservoir systems", Engineering Analysis
with Boundary Elements, Elsevier, 33, pp. 1201{1210 (2009).
8. Chen, B. and Yuan, Y. Hydrodynamic pressures on arch dam during earthquakes", Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137(1), pp. 34{44 (2011).
9. Lefrancois, A., Leger, P., and Bouaanani, N. Finite element seismic safety assessment of water intake structures", Finite elements in analysis and design, 83, pp. 1{9 (2014).
10. Valamanesh, V., Estekanchi, H.E., Vafai, A., et al. Application of the endurance time method in seismic analysis of concrete gravity dams", Scientia Iranica,
A., 18(3), pp. 326{337 (2011).
11. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A. and Kianoush, M.K. Seismic analysis of a coupled dam-reservoir-foundation system considering pressure e ects at opened joints", Structure
and Infrastructure Engineering, 11, pp. 833{850 (2015).
M. Sunara et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 28 (2021) 1066{1078 1077
12. Ferdousi, A., Gharabaghi, M.A.R., Ahmadi, M.T., et al. Earthquake analysis of arch dams including the effects of foundation discontinuities and proper boundary
conditions", Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 52(3), pp. 579{594 (2014).
13. Ahmadi, M.T. and Haghani, M. Methods for design of large dam gates under seismic hydrodynamic action", Proceedings of the U.S.-Iran Seismic Workshop, pp. 18{20 (2012).
14. Tyvand, P.A. and Miloh, T. Incompressible impulsive sloshing", Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 708, pp. 279{ 302 (2012).
15. Lee, C.S., Cho, J.R., Kim, W.S., et al. Evaluation of sloshing resistance performance for LNG carrier insulation system based on
uid-structure interaction
analysis", International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 5, pp. 1{20 (2013).
16. Fonfach, J.M., Manderbacka, T., and Neves, M.A.S. Numerical sloshing simulations: Comparison between Lagrangian and lumped mass models applied to two
compartments with mass transfer", Ocean Engineering, 114, pp. 168{184 (2016).
17. Gomez-Gesteira, M., Crespo, A.J.C., Rogers B.D., et al. Sphysics - development of a free-surface
fluid solver- part 2: Eciency and test cases", Computers
Geosciences, 48, pp. 300{307 (2012).
18. Sunara Kusic, M., Radnic, J., Grgic, N., et al. Sloshing in medium size tanks caused by earthquake studied by SPH", Gradevinar, 70(8), pp. 671{684 (2018).
19. Radnic, J., Grgic, N., Sunara Kusic, M., et al. Shake table testing of an open rectangular water tank with water sloshing", Journal of Fluids and Structures, 81,
pp. 97{115 (2018).
20. Liu, G.R. and Liu, M.B., Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method, World Scienti c Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. (2003).
21. Kelager, M., Lagrangian Fluid Dynamics Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics, DIKU, University of Copenhagen (2006).
22. Lucy, L.B. A numerical approach to the testing of the ssion hypothesis", Astronomical Journal, 82, pp. 1013{1024 (1977).
23. Gingold, R.A. and Monaghan, J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to nonspherical stars", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical
Society, 181, pp. 375{389 (1977).
24. Monaghan, J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics", Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 30, pp. 543{574 (1992).
25. Monaghan, J.J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics", Reports on Progress in Physics, B, pp. 1703{1759 (2005).
26. Colagrossi, A. and Landrini, M. Numerical simulation of interfacial
ows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics", Journal of Computational Physics, 191, pp. 448{
475 (2003).
27. Monaghan, J.J. On the problem of penetration in particle methods", Journal of Computational Physics, 82, pp. 1{15 (1989).
28. Crespo, A.J.C., Gomez-Gesteira M., and Dalrymple, R.A. Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods", Computers, Materials, &
Continua, 5(3), pp. 173{184 (2007).
29. Mahdavi, A. and Talebbeydokhti N. A hybrid solid boundary treatment algorithm for smoothed particle hydrodynamics", Scientia Iranica, A., 22(4), pp.
1457{1469 (2015).
30. Sabahi, H. and Nikseresht A.H. Comparison of ISPH and WCSPH methods to solve
uid-structure interaction problems", Scientia Iranica, B., 23(6), pp. 2595{
2605 (2016).
31. https://wiki.manchester.ac.uk/sphysics/index.php/ Main-Page
32. Ordoubadi, M., Yaghoubi, M., and Yeganehdoust, F. Surface tension simulation of free surface
ows using smoothed particle hydrodynamics", Scientia Iranica,
24(4), pp. 2019{2033 (2017).
33. Crespo, A.J.C. Application of the smoothed particle hydrodynamics model SPHysics to free-surface hydrodynamics", PhD Thesis, Universidade de Vigo,
Portugal (2008).
34. Gomez-Gesteira, M., Rogers, B.D., Dalrymple, R.A., et al. State-of-the-art of classical SPH for free-surface
ows", Journal of Hydraulic Research, 48, pp. 6{27
(2010).
35. Para View, Online: www.kitware.com; www.paraview .org
36. Petrov, A.A. and Moiseev, N.N., Numerical Methods of Calculating the Natural Frequencies of Vibrations of a Bounded Volume of Fluid, Computing Center of
Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow (1966) (in Russian).
37. Newton, R.E., Finite Element Study of Shock Induced Cavitation, ACSE Spring Convention, Portland Oregon, April (1980).
38. Brzovic, D., Sunjic, G., Radnic J., et al. Numerical model for
uid-structure coupled problems under seismic load", Materials with Complex Behaviour II,
Advanced Structured Materials, A. Ochsner et al., Eds. Springer in Germany, 16, pp. 175{198 (2012).