1. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. Measuring the e_ciency of decision making units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), pp. 429{444 (1978). 2. Chu, J.F., Wu, J., and Song M.L. An SBM-DEA model with parallel computing design for environmental e_ciency evaluation in the big data context: A transportation system application", Annals of Operations Research, 270(1{2), pp. 105{124 (2018). 3. Chu, J., Wu, J., Zhu, Q., An, Q., and Xiong, B. Analysis of China's regional eco-e_ciency: A DEA two-stage network approach with equitable e_ciency decomposition", Computational Economics, 54(4), pp. 1263{1285 (2019). 4. Adler, N., Friedman, L., and Sinuany-Stern, Z. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context", European Journal of Operational Research, 140(2), pp. 249{265 (2002). 5. Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., and Hogan, A.J. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions", 2512 L. Li et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 27 (2020) 2499{2513 New Directions for Evaluation, 1986(32), pp. 73{105 (1986). 6. Anderson, T.R., Hollingsworth, K., and Inman, L. The _xed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model", Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17(3), pp. 249{255 (2002). 7. Bousso_ane, A., Dyson, R.G., and Thanassoulis, E. Applied data envel- opment analysis", European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), pp. 1{15 (1991). 8. Shang, J. and Sueyoshi, T. A uni_ed framework for the selection of a exible manufacturing system", European Journal of Operational Research, 85(2), pp. 297{315 (1995). 9. Baker, R. and Talluri, S. A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 32(1), pp. 101{ 108 (1997). 10. Green, R.H., Doyle, J.R., and Cook, W.D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation", European Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), pp. 461{472 (1996). 11. Ertay, T. and Ruan, D. Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMS", European Journal of Operational Research, 164(3), pp. 800{810 (2005). 12. Wu, J., Liang, L., Zha, Y., and Yang, F. Determination of cross-e_ciency under the principle of rank priority in cross-evaluation", Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), pp. 4826{4829 (2009). 13. Roboredo, M.C., Aizemberg, L., and Meza, L.A. The DEA game cross e_ciency model applied to the Brazilian football championship", Procedia Computer Science, 55, pp. 758{763 (2015). 14. Doyle, J. and Green, R. E_ciency and cross-e_ciency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), pp. 567{578 (1994). 15. Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W.D., and Zhu, J. Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-e_ciency evaluation", International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), pp. 1025{1030 (2008). 16. Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., and Luo, Y. Cross-e_ciency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units", Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), pp. 10312{10319 (2011). 17. Lim, S. Minimax and maximin formulations of crosse _ciency in dea", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(3), pp. 726{731 (2012). 18. Wu, J., Chu, J., Sun, J., and Zhu, Q. Dea crosse _ciency evaluation based on Pareto improvement", European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), pp. 571{579 (2016). 19. Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., and Jiang, P. Weight determination in the cross-e_ciency evaluation", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), pp. 497{502 (2011). 20. Wu, J., Sun, J., and Liang, L. Cross e_ciency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(2), pp. 513{519 (2012). 21. Sun, J., Yang, R., Ji, X., and Wu, J. Evaluation of decision-making units based on the weight-optimized DEA model", Kybernetika, 53(2), pp. 244{262 (2017). 22. Wu, J., Liang, L., and Zha, Y. Preference voting and ranking using DEA game cross e_ciency model (< special issue> operations research for performance evaluation)", Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 52(2), pp. 105{111 (2009). 23. Song, L. and Liu, F. An improvement in DEA crosse _ciency aggregation based on the Shannon entropy" International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), pp. 705{714 (2018). 24. Ruiz, J.L. and Sirvent, I. Fuzzy cross-e_ciency evaluation: a possibility approach", Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16(1), pp. 111{126 (2017). 25. Chen, H. Average lexicographic e_ciency for data envelopment analysis" Omega, 74(1), pp. 82{91 (2018). 26. Liu, H.H., Song, Y.Y., and Yang, G.L. Crosse _ciency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory", European Journal of Operational Research (2018). 27. Kao, C. and Liu, S.T. Cross e_ciency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems", Omega (2018). 28. Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W.D., and Zhu, J. The DEA game cross-e_ciency model and its Nash equilibrium", Operations Research, 56(5), pp. 1278{1288 (2008). 29. Wu, J., Liang, L., and Chen, Y. Dea game crosse _ciency approach to Olympic rankings", Omega, 37(4), pp. 909{918 (2009). 30. Sun, J., Fu, Y., Ji, X., and Zhong, R.Y. Allocation of emission permits using dea-game-theoretic model", Operational Research, 17(3), pp. 867{884 (2017). 31. Liu, X., Chu, J., Yin, P., and Sun, J. Dea crosse _ciency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: a case study of eco-e_ciency analysis of coal-_red power plants", Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp. 877{885 (2017). 32. Chen, W., Zhou, K., and Yang, S. Evaluation of china'_s electric energy e_ciency under environmental constraints: A DEA cross e_ciency model based on game relationship", Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, pp. 38{44 (2017).
)