Comparison of the effect of temperature parameter on the functionality of tracking and fixed photovoltaic systems: A case study in Tehran, Iran

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, A.C., Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Raja University, Ghazvin, Iran

Abstract

The production of energy by renewable energy, including photovoltaic systems, is always dependent on the environmental and geographical parameters at which the system is installed. Temperature is one of the most important environmental parameters affecting the performance of photovoltaic systems. The effect of this parameter on the fixed and tracking photovoltaic system is not the same. The tracking photovoltaic system, because it is exposed to the sun from sunrise to sunset, has a higher temperature at the surface of the panels than the fixed photovoltaic systems. The result obtained from the experiments in this study shows that the temperature-induced efficiency drop in the fixed and tracking photovoltaic systems is more than 7.98% and 10.02%, respectively. According to calculations, the temperature-induced efficiency drop in tracking photovoltaic systems is about 25.55% higher than that of fixed photovoltaic systems. Observations show that this temperature difference is most extent at sunrise and sunset, and as we approach noon this difference is reduced and minimized

Keywords


References
1. Bahrami, M., Gavagsaz-Ghoachani, R., Zandi, M.,et al. Hybrid maximum power point tracking algorithm",Renew. Energy, 130, pp. 982{991 (2019).2. Akrami, E., Khazaee, I., and Gholami, A. Comprehensiveanalysis of a multi-generation energy systemby using an energy-exergy methodology for hot water,cooling, power and hydrogen production", Appl.Therm. Eng., 129, pp. 995{1001 (2018).3. Rouholamini, M. and Mohammadian, M. Grid-pricedependentenergy management of a building suppliedby a multisource system integrated with hydrogen",International Journal of Engineering, 29(1), pp. 40{48 (2016).4. Darian, M.M., Ghorreshi, A.M., and Hajatzadeh, M.J.Evaluation of photovoltaic system performance: Acase study in east Azerbaijan, Iran", Iran. J. EnergyEnviron., 11(1), pp. 75{78 (2020).5. Zandi, M., Bahrami, M., Eslami, S., et al. Evaluationand comparison of economic policies to increase distributedgeneration capacity in theIranianhouseholdconsumption sector using photovoltaic systems andRETScreen software", Renew. Energy, 107, pp. 215{222 (2017).6. Kumar, R. and Biswas, A. Techno-economic optimizationof a stand-alone photovoltaic-battery renewableenergy system for low load factor situation- acomparison between optimization algorithms", InternationalJournal of Engineering, 30(10), pp. 1555{1564 (2017).7. Choudhary, P. and Kumar, R. Sustainabilityperspectives- a review for solar photovoltaic trends andgrowth opportunities", J. Clean. Prod., 227, pp. 589{612 (2019).8. Sahin, A.Z., Ayaz, M., Yilbas, B.S., and Al-shara,A. Performance enhancement of solar energy systemsusing nano uids: An updated review", RenewableEnergy, 145, pp. 1126{1148 (2020).9. Jamila, E. and Abdelmjid, S. Physical modelingof a hybrid wind turbine-solar panel system usingsimscape", Int. J. Eng., 27(11), pp. 1767{1776 (2014).10. Santhakumari, M. and Sagar, N. A review of the environmentalfactors degrading the performance of siliconwafer-based photovoltaic modules: Failure detectionmethods and essential mitigation techniques", Renew.Sustain. Energy Rev., 110, pp. 83{100 (2019).11. Maftah, A., Maarou , M., and Maarou , M. Experimentalevaluation of temperature e ect of two di erentPV experimental evaluation of temperature e ect oftwo di erent PV systems performances under aridclimate", Energy Procedia, 157, pp. 701{708 (2019).12. Salih, S.M., Jabur, Y.K., and Kadhim, L.A. Analysisof temperature e ect on a crystalline silicon photovoltaicmodule performance", International Journal ofEngineering, 29(5), pp. 722{727 (2016).13. Rad, A.H., Ghadamian, H., Haghgou, H.R., andSarhaddi, F. Energy and exergy evaluation of multichannelphotovoltaic/thermal hybrid system: Simulationand experiment", International Journal of Engineering,32(11), pp. 1665{1680 (2019).14. Aslan Gholamia, A.S. and Alemrajabib, A.A. Experimentalstudy of self-cleaning property of titaniumdioxide and nanospray coatings in solar applications",Sol. Energy, 157, pp. 559{565 (2017).15. Gholami, A., Khazaee, I., Eslami, S., Zandi, M., andAkrami, E. Experimental investigation of dust deposition
e ects on photo-voltaic output performance", Sol.Energy, 159, pp. 346{352 (2018).16. Subramaniam, K.N.V. and Murugan, E. Power analysisof non-tracking PV system with low power RTCbased sensor independent solar tracking (SIST) PVsystem", Mater. Today Proc., 5(1), pp. 1076{1081(2018).17. Fathabadi, H. Novel high ecient oine sensorlessdual-axis solar tracker for using in photovoltaic systemsand solar concentrators", Renew. Energy, 95, pp.485{494 (2016).18. Algarn, C.R., Castro, A.O., Naranjo, J.C., Magdalena,U., and Ingeniera, F.D. Dual-axis solartracker for using in photovoltaic systems", InternationalJournal of Renewable Energy Research, 7(1), pp.137{145 (2017).19. Said, Z. and Mehmood, A. Standalone photovoltaic
system assessment for major cities of United ArabEmirates based on simulated results", J. Clean. Prod.,142, pp. 2722{2729 (2017).20. Kumar, V. and Kumar, S. Design and developmentof dual axis solar panel tracking system for normalizedperformance enhancement of solar panel", InInternational Conference on Sustainable Computing inScience, Technology & Management (SUSCOM-2019),pp. 212{218 (2019).21. Afanasyeva, S., Bogdanov, D., Breyer, C., and Shell,R.D. Relevance of PV with single-axis tracking forenergy scenarios German Advisory Council on globalchange", Sol. Energy, 173, pp. 173{191 (2018).22. Bahrami, A., Okoye, C.O., and Atikol, U. Technicaland economic assessment of xed, single and dual-2 axis tracking PV panels in low latitude countries",Renew. Energy, 113, pp. 563{579 (2017).23. Dang, B., Cuong, M., and Ancheta, A.C. Energyyields of a GPS-based dual-axis solar tracker and a
xed mount PV panel operating in di erent weatherconditions", Journal of Science, Engineering, andTechnology, 56, pp. 43{56 (2018).24. Tseng, K. E ect of the sun elevation for xed PVsystem and single-axis-tracking PV system 1st", 2019IEEE 6th Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Appl., pp. 805{809(2019).M.M. Darian and A.M. Ghorreshi/Scientia Iranica, Transactions B: Mechanical Engineering 28 (2021) 1298{1305 130525. Smirnov, A.A., Vozmilov, A.G., and Romanov, P.A.Comparison of discrete sun tracking methods forphotovoltaic panels", 2019 Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Appl.Manuf., pp. 1{5 (2019).26. Eldin, S.A.S., Abd-elhady, M.S., and Kandil, H.A.Feasibility of solar tracking systems for PV panels inhot and cold regions", Renew. Energy, 85, pp. 228{233(2016).27. Simon Heslop, I.M. Comparative analysis of thevariability of xed and tracking photovoltaic systemsSimon", Sol. Energy, 107, pp. 351{364 (2014).28. Sebastijan Seme, D.K. and Srpcic, G. Dual-axisphotovoltaic tracking system-design and experimentalinvestigation", In Energy, 139, pp. 1267{1274 (2017).29. Bashar Hammada, A., Al-Sardeahb, A., Al-Abedd,M., Nijmehb, S., and Al-ghandoor, A. Performanceand economic comparison of xed and tracking photovoltaicsystems in Jordan", Renew. Sustain. EnergyRev., 80, pp. 827{839 (2017).30. PVSyst { Logiciel Photovoltaque" (2019). [Online].Available: www.pvsyst.com.
31. King, D.L., Boyson, W.E., and Kratochvil, J.A.,Photovoltaic Array Performance Model (Nov. 2003).32. Sathe, T.M. and Dhoble, A.S. A review on recentadvancements in photovoltaic thermal techniques",Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 76, pp. 645{672 (2017).33. Sahota, L. and Tiwari, G.N. Review on series connectedphotovoltaic thermal (PVT) systems: Analyticaland experimental studies", Sol. Energy, 150, pp.96{127 (2017).34. Lamnatou, C. and Chemisana, D. Photovoltaic/thermal (PVT) systems: A review with emphasis onenvironmental issues", Renew. Energy, 105, pp. 270{287 (2016).35. Brahim, T. and Jemni, A. Economical assessmentand applications of photovoltaic/thermal hybrid solartechnology: A review", Sol. Energy, 153, pp. 540{561(2017).36. Aste, N., Del Pero, C., and Leonforte, F. Water PVTcollectors performance comparison", Energy Procedia,105, pp. 961{966 (2017).37. Technical Dat Conergy PE 245P{265P" (2019).[Online]. Available at:https://www.solaris-shop.com/conergy-pe-255p-255w-poly-solar-panel/.