Effect of the Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connect mechanism on stock market volatility

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 School of Mathematics and Economics, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan 430205, P. R. China

2 School of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China

3 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang 438000, P. R. China

Abstract

The implementation of the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect (SHSC) mechanism has realized the largest two-way opening of China's capital market, but also increased the transmission of risks. In order to analyze the impact of SHSC on the volatility of single market in Shenzhen or Hong Kong, this paper establishes the volatility models of stock markets in Shenzhen and Hong Kong based on the GARCH-type models with different perturbation terms. The pre-applicable test is made and the result shows that the return rate series of Shenzhen and Hong Kong stock markets are stable and heteroscedastic, and they meet the conditions of establishing the GARCH-type models. Then, the GARCH model and EGARCH model are established to analyze the volatility of stock markets in Shenzhen and Hong Kong respectively. The results show that the opening of SHSC has increased the short-term volatility of the stock markets in Shenzhen and Hong Kong and improved the efficiency of information transmission between these two stock markets. Moreover, influenced by SHSC, the leverage effect of Shenzhen stock market is increasing, while that of Hong Kong stock market is decreasing.

Keywords


References:
1. Cao, F.Q. Reform, innovation and risk prevention of China's capital market", Finance Forum, 23(9), pp. 5{10 (2018).
2. Gui, H., Market Expectations of Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, China Finance, 17, pp. 74{75 (2016).
3. Wang, Q.Y. and Chong, T.T.L. Co-integrated or not? after the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connection schemes", Economics Letters, 163, pp. 167{171 (2018).
4. Rao, C.J., Xiao, X.P., Goh, M., et al. Compound mechanism design of supplier selection based on multiattribute
auction and risk management of supply chain", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, pp. 63{75 (2017).
5. Qu, S.J., Zhou, Y.Y., Zhang, Y.L., et al. Optimal strategy for a green supply chain considering shipping policy and default risk", Computers and Industrial Engineering, 131, pp. 172{186 (2019)
6. Engle, R.F. Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. infalation", Econometrica, 50(4), pp. 987{1008 (1982).
7. Engle, R.F. and Victor, K.N. Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility", Journal of Finance, 48(5), pp. 1022{1082 (1993).
8. Engle, R.F., Lilien, D.M., and Robins, R.P. Estimating time varying risk premia in the term structure: the ARCH-M model", Econometrica, 55(2), pp. 391{407 (1987).
9. Abdalla, S.Z.S. Modelling exchange rate volatility using GARCH models: empirical evidence from Arab countries", International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(3), pp. 216{229 (2012).
10. Omolo, S.A. Modelling exchange rate volatility of KES/USD using GARCH-type models", Journal of Finance, 10(3), pp. 47{59 (2014).
11. Dai, Z.F., Zhou, H.T., Wen, F.H., et al. Efficient predictability of stock return volatility: The role of C. Wang et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 29 (2022) 372{386 385
stock market implied volatility", The North American
Journal of Economics and Finance, 52, p. 101174
(2020).
12. Zhang, T.H., Yuan, Y., and Wu, X. Is microblogging
data re
ected in stock market volatility? Evidence
from Sina Weibo", Finance Research Letters, 32, p.
101173 (2020).
13. Baklaci, H.F., Aydogan, B., and Yelkenci, T. Impact
of stock market trading on currency market volatility
spillovers", Research in International Business and
Finance, 52, p. 101182 (2020).
14. Kawakatsu, H. Matrix exponential GARCH", Journal
of Econometrics, 134(1), pp. 95{128 (2006).
15. Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R., and Runkle, D.E.
On the relation between the expected value and the
volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks",
Journal of Finance, 38(5), pp. 1779{1801 (1993).
16. Zakoian, J.M. Threshold heteroskedastic models",
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18(5),
pp. 931{955 (1994).
17. Baillie, R.T., Bollerslev, T., and Mikkelsen, H.O.
Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive
conditional heteroskedasticity", Journal of Econometrics,
74(1), pp. 3{30 (1996).
18. Bollerslev, T. A conditionally heteroskedastic time
series model for speculative prices and rates of return",
Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), pp. 542{
547 (1987).
19. Nelson, D.B. 3-conditional heteroskedasticity in asset
returns: a new approach", Econometrica, 59(2), pp.
37{64 (1996).
20. Fornari, F. and Mele, A. Modeling the changing
asymmetry of conditional variances", Economics Letters,
50(2), pp. 197{203 (1996).
21. Laopodis, N.T. Monetary policy implications of
volatility linkages among long-term interest rates",
Journal of Economics and Finance, 24(2), pp. 160{
179 (2000).
22. Hung, J.C. Intelligent threshhold GARCH model
applied to stock market of transmissions that volatility",
Proceedings of the International Conference on
Convergence Information Technology, pp. 1523{1528
(2007).
23. Yu, H.H., Fang, L.B., and Sun, W.C. Forecasting
performance of global economic policy uncertainty
for volatility of Chinese stock market", Physica A:
Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 505(3), pp.
931{940 (2018).
24. Zhou, X.H. and Huang, Y. Research on the volatility
relationship between the stock markets of Shanghai
and Shenzhen", Economics and Management Research,
8, pp. 77{82 (2008).
25. Jiang, T.H. Reversal of asymmetric e ect of stock
market volatility in China - An empirical study based
on VS-GARCH model", Modern Finance and Economics,
2, pp. 65{68 (2008).
26. Guo, H. Analysis of Chinese stock market volatility:
an empirical study based on RS-GARCH model",
Financial Theory & Practice, 2, pp. 78{80 (2014).
27. Wang, M. and Wang, C.L. Research on conditional
value at risk based on return volatility and heavy
tail - Evidence from CSI 300 index", Mathematics in
Practice and Theory, 47(17), pp. 70{76 (2017).
28. Zheng, Z.X., Wang, H.R., and Zhu, F.M. Studies
on volatility features and jump behavior of Shanghai
50ETF market based on Levy-GARCH model", Chinese
Journal of Management Science, 27(2), pp. 41{52
(2019).
29. Kim, H.Y. andWon, C.H. Forecasting the volatility of
stock price index: A hybrid model integrating LSTM
with multiple GARCH-type models", Expert Systems
with Applications, 1031, pp. 25{37 (2018).
30. Wang, L., Ma, F., Liu, J., et al. Forecasting
stock price volatility: New evidence from
the GARCH-MIDAS model", International Journal
of Forecasting, 36(2), pp. 684{694 (2020). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast. 2019.08 .005
31. Rao, C.J., Goh, M., Zhao, Y., et al. Location selection
of sustainability city logistics centers", Transportation
Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36, pp.
29{44 (2015).
32. Xiao, Q.Z., Chen, L., Xie, M., et al. Optimal contract
design in sustainable supply chain: interactive impacts
of fairness concern and overcon dence", Journal of the
Operational Research Society, 72(7), pp. 1505{1524
(2021). DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1727784
33. Zhou, W. and Xu, Z.S. Envelopment analysis, preference
fusion, and membership improvement of intuitionistic
fuzzy numbers", IEEE Transactions on
Fuzzy Systems, 28(9), pp. 2119{2130 (2020). DOI:
10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2930483
34. Rao, C.J., Lin, H., and Liu, M. Design of comprehensive
evaluation index system for P2P credit risk of
three rural" borrowers", Soft Computing, 24(15), pp.
11493{11509 (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-04613-z
35. Wang, M.T., Lu, L., and Song, K. Impacts of policy
factors on volatility of stock markets", Journal of
Management Sciences in China, 15(12), pp. 40{57
(2012).
36. Liu, J., Ma, F., and Zhang, Y.J. Forecasting the
Chinese stock volatility across global stock markets",
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications,
525, pp. 466{477 (2019).
37. Liu, L. and Pan, Z.Y. Forecasting stock market
volatility: The role of technical variables", Economic
Modelling, 84, pp. 55{65 (2020).
386 C. Wang et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 29 (2022) 372{386
38. Tian, C. and Peng, J.J. An integrated picture fuzzy
ANP-TODIM multi-criteria decision-making approach
for tourism attraction recommendation", Technological
and Economic Development of Economy, 26(2), pp.
331{354 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.
2019.11412
39. Corbet, S., Gurdgiev, C., and Meegan, A. Longterm
stock market volatility and the in
uence of
terrorist attacks in Europe", The Quarterly Review of
Economics and Finance, 68, pp. 118{131 (2018).
40. Adel Rastkhiz, S.E., Mobini Dehkordi, A., Jahangiri
Farsi, Y., et al. A new approach to evaluating
entrepreneurial opportunities", Journal of Small Business
and Enterprise Development, 26(1), pp. 67{84
(2018).
41. Fang, L.B., Guo, B.S., and Zeng, Y. The e ect of
skewness parameter on the performance of GARCH
family when making estimation and prediction", Statistical
Research, 31(10), pp. 106{112 (2014).
42. Li, F.S. Does margin trading aggravate stock market
uctuation? From the perspective of asymmetric
volatility", Journal of Financial Research, 440(2), pp.
147{162 (2017).
43. Lee, O. V-uniform ergodicity of a continuous time
asymmetric power GARCH(1,1) model", Statistics &
Probability Letters, 82(4), pp. 812{817 (2012).
44. Yang, H. and Wu, X.G. Semiparametric EGARCH
model with the case study of China stock market",
Economic Modelling, 28(3), pp. 761{766 (2011).
45. Do, A., Powell, R. Yong, J., et al. Time-varying asymmetric
volatility spillover between global markets and
China's A, B and H-shares using EGARCH and DCCEGARCH
models", The North American Journal of
Economics and Finance, 54, p. 101096 (2020). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.101096