A novel damage detection method based on flexibility identification theory and data fusion technique

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Engineering Mechanics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.

10.24200/sci.2019.21419

Abstract

 An improved flexibility-based method hasbeen proposed in this studyfor damage detection, in which multi-scale convolution is utilized to decrease the interference of the measurementnoise and theDempster-Shafer evidence theory has been adopted to combine all scale information together to amplifythe damage characteristics. Threemain features make theproposed method distinguish with previous study:1)The proposed method is a kind of no-baseline flexibility-based method. Namely, this method can locate the damage with the absence of intact structural flexibility serving as baseline; 2) The flexibilityis estimated without requiring known the structural mass, which is a necessary in traditional method for flexibility estimation; 3) By utilizing multi-scale space theory and data fusion approach, the proposed methodhas a superior noise tolerant ability. Both numerical and experimental examples have been studied to reveal the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed methodindifferent noise level. The comparison between traditionalmethod and proposed method demonstrates that the latteris well suited to detect damage in beams structure in a noisy environment.

Keywords


1. Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A. An improved charged system search for structural damage identi_cation in beams and frames using changes in natural frequencies", Int. J. of Optim. Civil. Eng., 3(2), pp. 321-340 (2012). 2. Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A. An improved CSS for damage detection of truss structures using changes in natural frequencies", Adv Eng Softw, 80, pp. 93-100 (2015). 3. Cimellaro, G.P., Pianta, S., and Destefano, A. Output-only modal identi_cation of ancient L'Aquila city hall and civic tower", ASCE J Struct Eng., 138(4), pp. 481-491 (2012). 4. Zhang, J., Prader, J., Moon, F., et al. Experimental vibration analysis for structural identi_cation of a long span suspension bridge", ASCE J Eng Mech., 139(6), pp. 748-759 (2013). 5. Kaveh, A. and Maniat, A. Damage detection based on MCSS and PSO using modal data", Smart Structures and Systems, 5(15), pp. 1253-1270 (2015). 6. Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A. A guided modal strain energy based approach for structural damage identi _cation using tug of war optimization algorithm", ASCE, J Comput Civil Eng., 31(4), pp. 1-12 (2017). DOI:04017016 7. Kaveh, A., Vaez, S.R. Hoseini, and Hosseini, P. Enhanced vibrating particle system algorithm for damage identi_cation of truss structure", Sci Iran, 26(1), pp. 246-256 (2019). 8. Zimmerman, D.C. and Kaouk, M. Structural damage detection using a minimum rank update theory", J Vib Acoust, 116, pp. 222-231 (1994). 9. Lu, Q., Ren, G., and Zhao, Y. Multiple damage location with exibility curvature and relative frequency change for beam structures", J Sound Vib, 253(5), pp. 1101-1114 (2002). 10. Grande, E. and Imbimbo, M. A multi-stage approach for damage detection in structural systems based on exibility", Mech Syst Signal Process, 76-77, pp. 455- 475 (2016). 11. Zhang, Z. and Aktan, A.E. Application of modal exibility and its derivatives in structural identi_cation", Res Nondestruct Eval, 10, pp. 43-61 (1998). 12. Wang, J. and Qiao, P. Improved damage detection for beam-type structures using a uniform load surface", Struct Health Monit, 6, pp. 99-112 (2007). 13. Bernal, D. and Gunes, B. Flexibility based approach for damage characterization: benchmark application", J Eng Mech, 130, pp. 61-70 (2004). 14. Yan, W.J. and Ren, W.X. Closed-form modal exibility sensitivity and its application to structural damage detection without modal truncation error", J Vib Control, 20(12), pp. 1816-1830 (2014). 15. Zhang, J., Xu, J.C., Guo, S.L., et al. Flexibility-based structural damage detection with unknown mass for IASC-ASCE benchmark studies", Eng Struct, 48, pp. 486-496 (2013). 16. Pandey, A.K. and Biswas, M. Damage detection in structure using changes in exibility", J. Sound Vib, 169(1), pp. 3-17 (1994). 17. Hosseinzadeh, A.Z., Amiri, G.G., and Razzaghi, S.A.S., et al. Structural damage detection using sparse sensors installation by optimization procedure based on the modal exibility matrix", J Sound Vib, 381, pp. 65-82 (2016). 18. Cheng, Y.Y., Zhao, C.Y., and Zhang, J. Application of a novel long-gauge _ber bragg grating sensor for corrosion detection via a two-level strategy", Sensors, 19(4), 954, pp. 1-18 (2019). DOI: 10.3390/s19040954 19. Sazonov, E. and Klinkhachorn, P. Optimal spatial sampling interval for damage detection by curvature or strain energy mode shapes", J. Sound Vib, 285, pp. 783-801 (2005). 20. Cao, M.S. and Qiao, P.Z. Novel Laplacian scheme and multiresolution modal curvatures for structural damage identi_cation", Mech. Syst. Signal Process, 23, pp. 1223-1242 (2009). 21. Chandrashekhar, M. and Ganguli, R. Damage assessment of structures with uncertainty by using mode shape curvatures and fuzzy logic", J Sound Vib., 326, pp. 939-957 (2009). 22. Cao, M.S., Radzienski, M., and Xu, W., et al. Identi- _cation of multiple damage in beams based on robust curvature mode shapes", Mech. Syst. Signal Process, 46, pp. 468-480 (2014). 23. Guo, H. Structural damage detection using information fusion technique", Mech. Syst. Signal Process, 20(5), pp. 1173-1188 (2006). 24. Grande, E. and Imbimbo, M. A multi-stage approach for damage detection of linear system based on modal strain energy", J. Civil Struct. Health Mon, 4, pp. 107- 118 (2014). 25. Guo, T. and Xu, Z.L. Data fusion of multi-scale representations for structural damage detection", Mech. Syst. Signal Process, 98, pp. 1020-1033 (2018). 26. Peeters, B., Van der Auweraer, H., Guillaume, P., et al. The PolyMAX frequency domain method: a new standard for modal parameter estimation", Shock Vib., 11(3-4), pp. 395-409 (2004). 27. Catbas, F.N., Brown, D.L., and Aktan, A.E. Use of modal exibility for damage detection and condition 2298 Y.Y. Cheng et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 26 (2019) 2286{2298 assessment: case studies and demonstrations on large structures", J Struct Eng., 132(11), pp. 1699-1712 (2006). 28. Reynders, E. and Roeck, G.D. Referenced-based combined deterministic-stochastic subspace identi_cation for experimental and operational modal analysis", Mech Syst Signal Process, 22(22), pp. 617-637 (2006). 29. Teager, H.M. and Teager S.M., A Phenomenological Model for Vowel Production in the Cocal Tract, College-Hill Press, San Diego (1983). 30. Kaiser, J.F. On a simple algorithm to calculate the energy of a signal", in IEEE Proceeding, ICASSP-90, pp. 381-384 (1990). 31. Shafer, G., A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1976).