Sensitivity analysis of economic variables using neuro-fuzzy approach

Document Type : Research Note

Authors

1 Department of Computer Engineering, Torbat-e Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Torbat-e Jam, Iran

2 Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology, Payam-e Noor University, Asalooye, Iran

3 Center for Intelligence Systems Research, Deakin University, Geelong 3217, Australia

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis (SA) is a vital task for decision making in economic management. In this paper, a novel fuzzy sensitivity analyzer (FSA) is proposed to analyze the sensitivity of economic variables. The proposed FSA algorithm consists of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) that is adjusted for forecasting economic time series. Based on the output of ANFIS, FSA can determine the importance degree of parameters. In the numerical studies, the proposed method is applied for the sensitivity analysis of oil and gold time series. According to the results, FSA indicates that oil price is highly dependent upon the inflation rate, dollar index and market index while OPEC production level and gold price have less impact. Furthermore, in the gold price modeling, the highest sensitivity is obtained from silver price while demand for gold is more a function of market index and inflation rate. The proposed method can be used in many SA applications.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Kilian, L., and Vigfusson, R.J. Do oil prices help forecast US real GDP? The role of nonlinearities and asymmetries", Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 31(1), pp. 78{93 (2013). 2. Iooss, B. and Lema^_tre, P. A review on global sensitivity analysis methods", In Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems, pp. 101{122 (2015). 3. Sarrazin, F., Pianosi, F., andWagener, T. Global sensitivity analysis of environmental models: convergence 1358 E. Lot_ et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions D: Computer Science & ... 27 (2020) 1352{1359 and validation", Environmental Modelling & Software, 79, pp. 135{152 (2016). 4. Kami_nski, B., Jakubczyk, M., and Szufel, P. A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees", Central European Journal of Operations Research, 26(1), pp. 135{159 (2018). 5. Escalante Soberanis, M.A., Mithrush, T., Bassam, A., et al. A sensitivity analysis to determine technical and economic feasibility of energy storage systems implementation: A ow battery case study", Renewable Energy, 115, pp. 547{557 (2018). 6. Borgonovo, E. and Plischke, E. Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances", European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), pp. 869{887 (2016). 7. Antucheviciene, J., Kala, Z., Marzouk, M., et al. Solving civil engineering problems by means of fuzzy and stochastic MCDM methods: current state and future research", Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2015). 8. Kala, Z. and Vales, J. Sensitivity assessment and lateral-torsional buckling design of I-beams using solid _nite elements", Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 139, pp. 110{122 (2017). 9. Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Haji Yakhchali, S., Volungevi_cien_e, D., et al. Forecasting gold price changes by using adaptive network fuzzy inference system", Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(5), pp. 994{1010 (2012). 10. Harenberg, D., Marelli, S., Sudret, B., and Winschel, V. Uncertainty quanti_cation and global sensitivity analysis for economic models", Quantitative Economics, 10(1), pp. 1{41 (2019). 11. Ghosh, N. and Hazra, S. Sensitivity analysis with calibration of natural resource variables under climate change: comparing computable general equilibrium (CGE) and econometric frameworks", Natural Resources Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, IGI Global, pp. 681{691 (2017). 12. Ferretti, F., Saltelli, A., and Tarantola, S. Trends in sensitivity analysis practice in the last decade", Science of the Total Environment, 568, pp. 666{670 (2016). 13. Rahmati, O., Tahmasebipour, N., Haghizadeh, A., et al. Evaluating the inuence of geo-environmental factors on gully erosion in a semi-arid region of Iran: An integrated framework", Science of the Total Environment, 579, pp. 913{927 (2017). 14. Kala, Z. and Vale_s, J. Global sensitivity analysis of lateral-torsional buckling resistance based on _nite element simulations", Engineering Structures, 134, pp. 37{47 (2017). 15. Bams, D., Blanchard, G., Honarvar, I., et al. Does oil and gold price uncertainty matter for the stock market?", Journal of Empirical Finance, 44, pp. 270{ 285 (2017). 16. Valdivia, S., and Morales, A. Determinants of the index of prices and quotations on the Mexican stock exchange: Sensitivity analysis based on arti_cial neural networks", Global Journal of Business Research, 10(2), pp. 27{32 (2016). 17. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Kazimieras Zavadskas, et al. A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations", Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 18(1), pp. 32{49 (2018). 18. Wang, L., Zhang, H., Wang, J., and Li, L. Picture fuzzy normalized projection-based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project", Applied Soft Computing, 64, pp. 216{226 (2018). 19. Tigdemir, M., and Kalyoncuoglu, S.F. Fatigue life prediction of the modi_ed asphalt mixtures with ANFIS modeling", Scientia Iranica, Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 24(1), p. 72 (2017). 20. Hasheminejad, M.M., Sohankar, N., and Hajiannia, A. Predicting the collapsibility potential of unsaturated soils using adaptive neural fuzzy inference system and particle swarm optimization", Scientia Iranica, 25(6), pp. 2980{2996 (2018). 21. Asvar, F., Shirmohammadi Faradonbeh, A., and Barkhordari, K. Predicting potential of controlled blasting-induced liquefaction using neural networks and neuro-fuzzy system", Scientia Iranica, 25(2), pp. 617{631 (2018). 22. OZEL, C. and Topsakal, A. Comparison of ANFIS and ANN for estimation of thermal conductivity coef- _cients of construction materials volume", 22(6), pp. 2001{2011 (2015). 23. Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, N.A., and Soytas, U. Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradualshift causality and volatility transmission analysis", Energy Economics, 60, pp. 168{175 (2016). 24. Silvennoinen, A. and Thorp, S. Crude oil and agricultural futures: an analysis of correlation dynamics", Journal of Futures Markets, 36(6), pp. 522{544 (2016). 25. Jobling, A. and Jamasb, T. Price volatility and demand for oil: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries", Economic Analysis and Policy, 53, pp. 96{113 (2017). 26. Liu, Z., Johnson, T.G., and Altman, I. The moderating role of biomass availability in biopower co-_ring-A sensitivity analysis", Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, pp. 523{532 (2016). 27. Tse, K.-K., Chow, T.-T., and Su, Y. Performance evaluation and economic analysis of a full scale waterbased photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) system in an of- _ce building", Energy and Buildings, 122, pp. 42{52 (2016). 28. Chang, A.Y., Robinson, L.A., Hammitt, J.K., et al. Economics in Global Health 2035": a sensitivity analysis of the value of a life year estimates", Journal of Global Health, 7(1), pp. 1{13 (2017). E. Lot_ et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions D: Computer Science & ... 27 (2020) 1352{1359 1359 29. Liu, H. Cost estimation and sensitivity analysis on cost factors: a case study on Taylor Kriging, regression and arti_cial neural networks", The Engineering Economist, 55(3), pp. 201{224 (2010). 30. Thawornwong, S., Enke, D., and Dagli, C. Neural networks as a decision maker for stock trading: a technical analysis approach", International Journal of Smart Engineering System Design, 5(4), pp. 313{325 (2003). 31. Ince, H. and Trafalis, T.B. Short term forecasting with support vector machines and application to stock price prediction", International Journal of General Systems, 37(6), pp. 677{687 (2008). 32. Ince, H. and Trafalis, T.B. Kernel principal component analysis and support vector machines for stock price prediction", Iie Transactions, 39(6), pp. 629{637 (2007). 33. Jang, J.-S.R. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), pp. 665{685 (1993). 34. Jang, J.-S.R., Sun, C.T., and Mizutani, E. Neurofuzzy and soft computing-a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence [Book Review]", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 42(10), pp. 1482{1484 (1997). 35. Chiu, S.L. Fuzzy model identi_cation based on cluster estimation", Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2(3), pp. 267{278 (1994). 36. Yager, R.R. and Filev, D.P. Generation of fuzzy rules by mountain clustering", Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2(3), pp. 209{219 (1994). 37. Lot_, E. and Karimi, M.R. OPEC oil price prediction using ANFIS", Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 10, pp. 286{296 (2014). 38. Lot_, E., Darini, M., and Karimi-T, M.R. Cost estimation using ANFIS", The Engineering Economist, 61(2), pp. 144{154 (2016). 39. Lot_, E. and Karimi, M.R. An economic dataset for OPEC oil economic functions", Majlesi Journal of Energy Management, 3(3), pp. 1{8 (2014). 40. Narayan, P.k., Narayan, S., and Zheng, X. Gold and oil futures markets: Are ma..rkets e_cient?", Applied Energy, 87(10), pp. 3299{3303 (2010). 41. Melvin, M. and Sultan, J. South African political unrest, oil prices, and the time varying risk premium in the gold futures market", The Journal of Futures Market, 10(2), pp. 103{111 (1990). 42. Zhang, Y.-J. and Wei, Y.-M. The crude oil market and the gold market: Evidence for cointegration, causality and price discovery", Resources Policy, 35(3), pp. 168{177 (2010). 43. Sujit, K.S. and Rajesh Kumar, B. Study on dynamic relationship among gold price, oil price, exchange rate and stock market returns", International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 9(2), pp. 145{165 (2011). 44. Smith, A.E. and Mason, A.K. Cost estimation predictive modeling: Regression versus neural network", The Engineering Economist, 42(2), pp. 137{161 (1997). 45. Ghermandi, A., Sheela, A.M., and Justus, J. Integrating similarity anlaysis and ecosystem service value transfer: Results from a tropical coastal wetland in India", Ecosystem Services, 22, pp. 73{82 (2016). 46. Kubo, M., Sato, H., Yamaguchi, A., and Aruka, Y. Similarity analysis of survey on employment trends in Japan", In Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, pp. 211{221, Springer, Cham (2017). 47. Ciampi, G., Rosato, A., and Sibilio, S. Thermoeconomic sensitivity analysis by dynamic simulations of a small Italian solar district heating energy storage", Energy, 143, pp. 757{771 (2018). e