Freight modal policies toward a sustainable society

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, P.O. Box 14588-89694, Iran

2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, P.O. Box 14588-89694, Iran

Abstract

Freight transport policy analysts struggle to shift truck freight movements to rail to diminish transportation externalities including environmental costs and safety issues. Therefore, policy-makers need to be aware of the consequences of their decisions beforehand. This study is mainly focused on two policies targeting fuel price and access to rail transportation. A nation-wide freight mode choice model is developed for Iran, and shippers’ tendency to choose rail or truck freight transportation is analyzed by considering the shipping time and cost, commodity weight, commodity type, and rail accessibility. Total fuel consumption and air pollution costs are compared in various scenarios. Based on the results, environmental transportation costs are significantly reduced as a result of the modal shift from truck to rail freight transportation, if the government reallocates the gasoline subsidy to the construction of prioritized railroads.

Keywords


References
1. Mirzaei, S. Transportation energy data book", Iranian
Academic Center for Education, Culture & Research,
Tehran, Iran, submitted to Iranian Fuel Conservation
Company (2010).
2. Sha zadeh, M., Amini, F., Tavanpour, M., et al.,
Energy Balance Sheet, Department of Electricity and
Energy A airs, Tehran, Iran, submitted to Ministry of
Energy (2010).
3. Cunningham, W.H. Freight modal choice and competition
in transportation: a critique and categorization
of analysis techniques", Transportation Journal, 21(4),
pp. 66{75 (1982).
4. Norojono, O. and Young, W. A stated preference
freightmode choice model", Transportation Planning
and Technology, 26(2) (2003).
A. Samimi et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 27 (2020) 2690{2703 2701
5. Arunotayanun, K. and Polak, J.W. Unobserved heterogeneity
in freight shippers' mode choice behavior",
In 11th World Conference on Transport Research,
Berkeley, CA, USA (2007).
6. Samimi, A., Kawamura, K., and Mohammadian, A. A
behavioral analysis of freight mode choice decisions",
Transportation Planning and Technology, 34(8), pp.
857{869 (2011).
7. Brooks, M.R., Puckett, S.M., Hensher, D.A., and
Sammons, A. Understanding mode choice decisions:
a study of Australian freight shippers", Maritime
Economics & Logistics, 14(3), pp. 274{299 (2012).
8. Hwang, T.S. Freight demand modeling and logistics
planning for assessment of freight systems' environmental
impacts", Doctoral Dissertation, University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA (2014).
9. McKinnon, A.C. and Piecyk, M.I. Measurement of
CO2 emissions from road freight transport: a review
of UK experience", Energy Policy, 37(10), pp. 3733{
3742 (2009).
10. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Commodity Flow
Survey Standard Classi cation of Transported Goods
(SCTG), U.S. Department of Transportation, USA
(2007).
11. Mahalanobis, P.C. On the generalized distance in
statistics", Proceedings National Institute of Science,
India (1936).
12. Wallis, K.F. Seasonal adjustment and relations between
variables", Journal of the American Statistical
Association, 69(345), pp. 18{31 (1974).
13. Reis, V. Analysis of mode choice variables in shortdistance
intermodal freight transport using an agentbased
model", Transportation Research Part A: Policy
and Practice, 61, pp. 100{120 (2014).
14. de Jong, G., Tavasszy, L., Bates, J., et al. The issues
in modelling freight transport at the national level",
Case Studies on Transport Policy, 4(1), pp. 13{21
(2016).
15. Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade Submission of
issued licenses", http://www.mimt.gov.ir/index.php?
module=cdk&func=loadmodule&system=cdk&sismodule=
user/content view.php&cn t id=45176&ctp id
=23 &id=12446&sisOp=view
16. Train, E.K., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation,
Cambridge University Press, New York, USA (2003).
17. Oum, T.H. A cross sectional study of freight transport
demand and rail-truck competition in Canada", The
Bell Journal of Economics, 10(2), pp. 463{482 (1979).
18. Information Technology Oce, Statistical Yearbook of
Rail Transportation, I.R. Iran Railways Organization,
Tehran, Iran (2011).
19. Information Technology Oce, Statistical Yearbook of
Road Transportation, I.R. of Iran Road Maintenance
& Transportation Organization, Tehran, Iran (2011).
20. Mirzaei, S., Transportation Energy Data Book, Iranian
Academic Center for Education, Culture & Research,
Tehran, Iran, submitted to Iranian Fuel Conservation
Company (2011).
21. Heger, J. Map of Iranian railways", http://www.
iranrail.net/map.php
22. Moridpour, S., Mazloumi, E., and Mesbah, M. Impact
of heavy vehicles on surrounding trac characteristics",
Journal of Advanced Transportation, 49(4), pp.
535{552 (2015).