Endurance Time Analysis of skewed slab-on-girder bridges: The significance of the excitation angle

Document Type : Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In this paper the influence of excitation angle on the Endurance Time (ET) analysis of skewed slab-on-girder bridges is studied. The excitation of the structure due to critical angle leads to the maximum seismic responses that are sometimes significantly higher than the average. The modeled bridges are slab-on-girder type which are typically used as highway bridges. The bridge models have skew angles of 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 degrees. The ET excitations exerted on the structures cover a broad range of hazard levels. The results provide some insight for choosing multiple excitation angles in such a way that balances computational costs and retains acceptable accuracy for practical design purposes. Sensitivity of life cycle cost (LCC) to skewness is also studied.

Keywords


1. Buckle, I.G., The Northridge, California Earthquake of January 17, 1994: Performance of Highway Bridges, NCEER-94-0008, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Bu_alo (NY) (1994). 2. Jennings, P.C., Engineering Features of the San Fernando Earthquake of February 9, 1971, Report no. EERL-71-02, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena (1971). 3. Ghobarah, A. and Tso, W. Seismic analysis of skewed highway bridges with intermediate supports", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2(3), pp. 235-248 (1973). 4. Maragakis, E.A. and Jennings, P.C. Analytical models for the rigid body motions of skew bridges", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 15(8), pp. 923-944 (1987). 5. Abdel-Mohti, A. and Pekcan, G. Seismic response of skewed RC box-girder bridges", Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 7(4), pp. 415-426 (2008). 6. Kaviani, P., Zareian, F., and Taciroglu, E. Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete bridges with skewangled seat-type abutments", Engineering Structures, 45, pp. 137-150 (2012). 7. AASHTO, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Speci_cations, American Association of State Highway and Transportation O_cials (2014). 8. Maleki, S. and Bisadi, V. Orthogonal e_ects in seismic analysis of skewed bridges", Journal of Bridge Engineering, 11(1), pp. 122-130 (2006). 9. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), pp. 491-514 (2002). 10. Estekanchi, H.E. and Vafai, H., Seismic Analysis and Design Using the Endurance Time Method, Volume I: Concepts and Development, Momentum Press (2018). 11. Bazmooneh, A. and Estekanchi, H.E. Determination of target time for endurance time method at di_erent seismic hazard levels", Scientia Iranica. Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 25(1), pp. 33-49 (2018). 12. FEMA, 440, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, D.C. (2005). 13. Estekanchi, H.E. Endurance Time method website", https://sites.google.com/site/etmethod/ (2018). 14. Mirzaee, A., Estekanchi, H.E., and Vafai, A. Improved methodology for endurance time analysis: From time to seismic hazard return period", Scientia Iranica, 19(5), pp. 1180-1187 (2012). 15. USGS United states geological survey hazard maps", https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/hazmaps (2017). 16. Maleki, S. E_ect of deck and support sti_ness on seismic response of slab-girder bridges", Engineering Structures, 24(2), pp. 219-226 (2002). 17. AASHTO, AASHTO Guide Speci_cations for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, American Association of State Highway and Transportation O_cials (2011). 18. Mirzaee, A. Application of endurance time method in performance-based design", PhD Dissertation, Sharif University of Technology (2013). 19. Solberg, K., Mander, J., and Dhakal, R. A rapid _nancial seismic risk assessment methodology with application to bridge piers", In 19th Biennial Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, Christchurch, New Zealand (2006). 20. Padgett, J.E., Dennemann, K., and Ghosh, J. Riskbased seismic life-cycle cost-bene_t (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retro_t assessment", Structural Safety, 32(3), pp. 165-173 (2010). 21. Basim, M.C., Estekanchi, H., and Vafai, A. A methodology for value based seismic design of structures by the endurance time method", Scientia Iranica, Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 23(6), p. 2514 (2016). 22. Gha_ari, E., Estekanchi, H.E., and Vafai, A. Application of Endurance Time method in seismic analysis of bridges", Scientia Iranica, (2018) (In Press). DOI:10.24200/sci.2018.5041.1382