Comparative study of damage behavior of synthetic and natural fiber-reinforced brittle composite and natural fiber-reinforced flexible composite subjected to low-velocity impact

Document Type : Article


Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangaluru 575025, India.


In the present study, comparative study on the damage behaviour of Glass-Epoxy (GE), Jute-Epoxy (JE) laminates with [0/90]s orientation and Jute-Rubber-Jute (JRJ) sandwich is carried out using ABAQUS/CAE finite element software. The GE, JE laminate and JRJ sandwich with thickness of 2 mm is impacted by a hemispherical shaped impactor at a velocity of 2.5 m/s. The mechanisms in which the brittle laminate gets damaged are analyzed using Hashin’s 2D failure criteria and flexible composites are analysed by ductile damage mechanism. The energy absorbed and the incipient point of each laminate was compared. It was observed from the results that there is no evidence of delamination in JRJ as opposed to GE and JE. The compliant nature of rubber contributes in absorbing more energy and it is slightly higher than GE. Also it was observed that there is no incipient point in JRJ sandwich which means there is no cracking of matrix since rubber is elastic material. Thus the JRJ material can be a better substitute for GE laminate in low velocity applications. The procedure proposed for the analysis in the present study can serve as benchmark method in modelling the impact behaviour of composite structures in further investigations.


Main Subjects

[1] Friedrich K, Almajid AA. Manufacturing aspects of advanced polymer composites for automotive applications. Applied Composite Materials 2013;20(2):107-128.
[2] Dogan A, Arikan V. Low-velocity impact response of E-glass reinforced thermoset and thermoplastic based sandwich composites. Composites Part B: Engineering 2017; 127: 63-69
[3] Richardson MOW, Wisheart MJ. Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Composites Part A: Applied science and manufacturing 1996;27(12):1123-1131.
[4] Jang BW, Kim CG. Real-time detection of low-velocity impact-induced delamination onset in composite laminates for efficient management of structural health. Composites Part B: Engineering 2017; 123: 124-135.
[5] Yang B, Wang Z, Zhou L, Zhang J, Liang W. Experimental and numerical investigation of interply hybrid composites based on woven fabrics and PCBT resin subjected to low-velocity impact. Composite Structures 2015; 132: 464-476.
[6] Yang B, Wang Z, Zhou L, Zhang J, Tong L, Liang W. Study on the low-velocity impact response and CAI behavior of foam-filled sandwich panels with hybrid facesheet. Composite Structures  2015; 132: 1129-1140.
[7] Wu J, Liu X, Zhou H, Li L, Liu Z. Experimental and numerical study on soft-hard-soft (SHS) cement based composite system under multiple impact loads. Materials and Design 2018; 139: 234-257.
[8] Yang B, He L, Gao Y. Simulation on impact response of FMLs: effect of fiber stacking sequence, thickness, and incident angle. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials 2017; 25(3): 621-631.
[9] Zhang C, Duodu EA, Gu J. Finite element modeling of damage development in cross-ply composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Composite Structures 2017; 173 : 219-227.
[10] Abir MR, Tay TE, Ridha M, Lee HP. On the relationship between failure mechanism and compression after impact (CAI) strength in composites. Composite Structures 2017;182 : 242-250
[11] Kling S, Czigany T. Damage detection and self-repair in hollow glass fiber fabric reinforced epoxy composites via fiber filling. Composites  Science and Technology 2014; 99 : 82-88.
[12] Wang Z, Xu L, Sun X, Shi M, Liu J. Fatigue behavior of glass-fiber-reinforced epoxy composites embedded with shape memory alloy wires. Composite Structures 2017; 178 : 311-319.
[13] Almansour FA, Dhakal HN, Zhang ZY. Effect of water absorption on Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of flax/basalt reinforced vinyl ester hybrid composites. Composite Structures 2017; 168 : 813-825.
[14] Wang S, Huang L, An Q, Geng L, Liu B. Dramatically enhanced impact toughness of two-scale laminate-network structured composites. Materials and Design 2018; 140 : 163-171.
[15] Zhandarov S, Mader E. Determining the interfacial toughness from force–displacement curves in the pull-out and microbond tests using the alternative method. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 2016; 65: 11-18.
[16] Zheng N, Huang Y, Liu HY, Gao J, Mai YW. Improvement of interlaminar fracture toughness in carbon fiber/epoxy composites with carbon nanotubes/polysulfone interleaves. Composites Science and Technology 2017; 140 : 8-15.
[17] Sonnenfeld C, Jakani HM, Agogue R, Nunez P, Beauchene P. Thermoplastic/thermoset multilayer composites: A way to improve the impact damage tolerance of thermosetting resin matrix composites. Composite Structures 2017; 171:  298-305.
[18] Wambua P, Ivens I, Verpoest I. Natural fibers: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics? Composites Science and Technology  2003; 63(9):1259-1264.
[19] Monteiro SN, Lopes FPD, Ferreira AS, Nascimento DCO. Natural fiber polymer matrix composites: cheaper, tougher and environmentally friendly. JOM 2009; 61(1):17-22.
[20] Holbery J, Houston D. Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites applications in automotive. JOM 2006;58(11): 80-86.
[21] Thomas N, Paul SA, Pothan LA, Deepa B. Natural fibers: structure, properties and applications. In: Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I, editors. Cellulose fibers: bio- and nano-polymer composites. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2011: 3-42.
[22] Satyanarayana KG, Guimaraes JL, Wypych F. Studies on lingo cellulosic fibers of Brazil. Part I: Source, production, morphology, properties and applications. Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing 2007; 38(7):1694-1709.
[23] Ariatapeh MY, Mashayekhi M,  Rad SZ. Prediction of all-steel CNG cylinder fracture under impact using a damage mechanics approach.  Scientia Iranica Transaction B 2014; 21(3): 609-619.
[24] Vishwas M; Sharnappa Joladarashi; Satyabodh M Kulkarni. "Investigation on effect of using rubber as core material in sandwich composite plate subjected to low velocity normal and oblique impact loading". Scientia Iranica, , , 2018, -. doi: 10.24200/sci.2018.5538.1331
[25] Karas K. Plates under lateral impact. Archive of Applied Mechanics 1939; 10: 237-250.
[26] Hyunbum P. Investigation on low velocity impact behavior between graphite/epoxy composite and steel plate. Composite  Structures 2017; 171: 126-130.
[27] Khan SH, Sharma AP, Parameswaran V. An Impact induced damage in composite laminates with intra-layer and inter-laminate damage. Procedia Engineering 2017; 173: 409-416.
[28] Zhang C, Duodu EA, Jinan Gu. Finite element modeling of damage development in cross-ply composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Composite Structures 2017; 173: 219-227.
[29] Sangamesh R., Naveen Kumar, Ravishankar KS, Kulkarni SM. Mechanical characterization and finite element analysis of jute-epoxy composite. MATEC Web of  Conferences 2018; 144.
[30] Stuart M Lee. Handbook of Composite Reinforcement. Wiley publications, Palo Alto, California, USA, 1992.
[31] Mir A, Aribi C, Bezzazi B. Study of the green composite jute/epoxy. International Journal of Chemical, Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering 2014; 8 (2): 182-186.
[32] Hossain MR, Islam MA, Vuurea AV, Verpoest I. Effect of fiber orientation on the tensile properties of jute epoxy laminated composite. Journal of Scientific Research 2013; 5 (1): 43-54.
[33] Lopes CS, Camanho PP, Grdal Z, Maim P, Gonzlez EV. Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part II: Numerical simulations. Composites Science and Technology 2009; 69(7-8): 937- 947.
[34] Schn J. Coefficient of friction of composite delamination surfaces. Wear 2000; 237(1) :77-89.