Investigating the behavior factor of coupled concrete shear walls with steel coupling beam

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

The behavior factor is used to reduce the elastic spectrum ordinate or the forces obtained from a linear analysis in order to take into account the non-linear structural properties. The more accurate this parameter is estimated, the more exact responses of the structures will be obtained. Recently, coupled walls with steel coupling beams are extensively utilized as an efficient system against lateral forces in high-rise buildings. But, there is not enough information about the behavior of these walls during earthquake, and design codes have not suggested any behavior factor for this structural system. Consequently, this paper is devoted to find the behavior factor of this structural system. To achieve this goal, six-, twelve- and twenty-story buildings are assessed. Except for the number of stories, all characteristicsof these buildings are completely similar. Buidlings’ height, the length of the coupling beams and the coupling ratio are key parameters which influence the behavior factor of the aforesaid structural system. In this work, the effect of these parameters on this factor are studied.

Highlights

1. Bengar, H.A. and Aski, R.M. E_ect of steel and concrete coupling beams on seismic behavior of RC frame accompanied with coupled shear walls", Scientia Iranica, Transaction A, Civil Engineering, 24(5), pp. 2227{2241 (2017). 2. Hakimi, S. and Madandoust, R. Numerical study on coupling beam retro_tted using CFRP and GFRP sheets", American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(3), pp. 1125{1129 (2018). DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.201 3. Pulay, T. and Priestley, M.N. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, ISBN: 978-0- 471-54915-4 (1975). 4. Harries, K.A., Seismic Design and Retro_t of Coupled Walls using Structural Steel, McGill University Libraries (1995). 5. Gong, B. and Shahrooz, B.M. Concrete-steel composite coupling beams. II: Subassembly testing and design veri_cation", Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(6), pp. 632{638 (2001). 6. Su, R. and Zhu, Y. Experimental and numerical studies of external steel plate strengthened reinforced concrete coupling beams", Engineering Structures, 27(10), pp. 1537{1550 (2005). 7. Harries, K.A. and McNeice, D.S. Performance-based design of high-rise coupled wall systems", The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,15(3), pp. 289{306 (2006). 8. Shen, Q., Kurama, Y.C., and Weldon, B.D. Seismic design and analytical modeling of posttensioned hybrid coupled wall subassemblages", Journal of Structural Engineering, 132(7), pp. 1030{1040 (2006). 9. Fortney, P.J., Shahrooz, B.M., and Rassati, G.A. Large-scale testing of a replaceable fuse" steel coupling beam", Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(12), pp. 1801{1807 (2007). 10. El-Tawil, S., Harries, K., Fortney, J.P., et al. Seismic design of hybrid coupled wall systems: state of the art", Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(7), pp. 755{769 (2010). 11. Deng, Z., Xu, C., Zeng, J., et al. Investigation on the structural behavior of shear walls with steel truss coupling beams under seismic loading", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, Article ID 5602348 (2018). DOI: 10.1155/2018/5602348 12. Louzai, A. and Abed, A. Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses", Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(6), pp. 1773{ 1793 (2015). 13. Soltangharaei, V., Razi, M., and Gerami, M. Comparative evaluation of behavior factor of SMRF structures for near and far fault ground motions", Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 60(1), pp. 75{82 (2016). 14. Issa, M.S. and Issa, H.M. Application of pushover analysis for the calculation of behavior factor for reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames", International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 5(3), p. 216 (2015). 15. Hung, C.-C. and Lu, W.-T. Tall hybrid coupled structural walls: seismic behavior and design suggestions", International Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(5), pp. 567{582 (2018). M.H. Daneshvar and A. Karamodin/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 27 (2020) 2189{2197 2197 16. Hung, C.-C. and Lu, W.-T. A performance-based design method for coupled wall structures", Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 21(4), pp. 579{603 (2017). 17. Das, R., Zona, A., Vandoren, B., et al. Optimizing the coupling ratio of seismic resistant HCW systems with shear links", Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 147, pp. 393{407 (2018). 18. ASCE 7-05, American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA: ASCE (2005). 19. ACI 318, American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318 (2005). 20. El-Tawil, S., Fortney, J.P., Harries, K., et al., Recommendations for Seismic Design of Hybrid Coupled Wall Systems, American Society of Civil Engineers (2009). 21. Vona, M. and Mastroberti, M. Estimation of the behavior factor of existing RC-MRF buildings", Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(1), pp. 191{204 (2018). 22. Uang, C.-M. Establishing R (or R w) and C d factors for building seismic provisions", Journal of Structural Engineering, 117(1), pp. 19{28 (1991). 23. ATC-19 Structural response modi_cation factors", ATC Report 19 (1995). 24. Nassar, A. and Krawinkler, H. Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems", John Blume Earthquake Engineering Ctr. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Rep. 95. 1991, Stanford University, Stanford, California (1991). 25. Miranda, E. Site-dependent strength-reduction factors", Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(12), pp. 3503{3519 (1993). 26. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities", in Proc World Conf. Earthquake Eng., B-4 (1969). 27. Hassan, M. and El-Tawil, S. Inelastic dynamic behavior of hybrid coupled walls", Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(2), pp. 285{296 (2004). 28. AISC 341-05, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction (2005). 29. Cen, E., 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules", Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Standard EN 1998-1, Comit_e Europ_een de Normalisation (2004). 30. Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. N2-A method for nonlinear seismic analysis of regular buildings", 9th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering (1988).

Keywords

Main Subjects