A novel assessment approach to EFQM driven institutionalization using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sakarya University, Turkey

2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Beykent University, Turkey.

3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sakarya University, Turkey.

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly difficult for enterprises to survive under competitive conditions. Enterprises with high levels of institutionalization are able to survive and benefit more advantages than their competitors. Excellence models are widespread tools for measuring the degree of institutionalization of enterprises. The importance of institutionalization has been increasingly considered in excellence models. EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management) is a suitable tool to show how successful organizations are in terms of institutionalization. In this study, EFQM criteria are evaluated with fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making techniques. The fuzzy DEMATEL method is used to determine the interactions amongst main EFQM criteria. According to the relationship diagram obtained from the Fuzzy DEMATEL method, the weights of the sub criteria are calculated according to the expert evaluations using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) method. The criterion “Business Results” has been determined to be the most important criteria. The criteria weights are taken as input for the VIKOR method. The institutional scores obtained by the proposed method, and the scores given by the EFQM evaluators to the institutions, are statistically analyzed to demonstrate that the proposed method has produced meaningful results.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. References:

    1. Aydemir, O.T., Alpkan, L., Kitap_c_, H., et al.  Oze_gerleme modellerinin denge skor kart_gyla entegre edilmesi: bir ozde_gerleme modeli onerisi", Dumlup_nar  Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), pp. 205{ 220 (2015).
    2. Steed, C., Maslow, D., and Mazaletskaya, A. The EFQM excellence model for deploying quality management: A British-Russian journey", Higher Education Eur, 30, pp. 307{319 (2005).
    3. Yazici, S. Mukemmellikte yeni aray__slar: EFQM mukemmellik modeli ve orgutsel o_grenme", On Kalite Derne_gi, 39, pp. 32{38 (2000).
    4. Yaghoubi, N.M., Bandeii, M., and Moloudi, J. An empirical study of the EFQM excellence model in Iran", International Journal of Business Management, 6(5), p. 260 (2011).
    5. European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM), EFQM Model for Business Excellence, Brussels: EFQM (2012).
    6. Liu, Y.-H. and Ko, P.-F. A modi_ed EFQM Excellence Model for e_ective evaluation in the hotel industry", Total Quality Management Business Excellence, 29(13), pp. 1{14 (2017). 7. Ziaei, A.E., Alirezaee, H., Riyahi, A., et al. Assess causal relationships of EFQM model criteria using fuzzy dematel", Int Bus Manag, 10(11), pp. 2185{2189 (2016). 8. Taji, M., Siadat, A., and Hoveida, R. Identi_cation and ranking of key factors inuencing organizational agility implementation on total quality management", Int Bus Manag, 10(15), pp. 2814{2822 (2016). 9. Naja_, A. and Naji, E. Implementing the EFQM model in the calcimin company using the fuzzy hybrid electre approach", Indian Journal Sci Technol, 9(44), pp. 1{7 (2016). 10. Saryazdi, M.D., Eslami, H., Shakerian, H., et al. Utilizing fuzzy expert system in organizations' performance assessment", IIOAB J, 7, pp. 410{417 (2016). 11. Hosseini, J.E., Dehghani, M.S., and Mostafaeipour, A. Implementing fuzzy logic and AHP into the EFQM model for performance improvement: A case study", Applied Soft Computer, 36, pp. 165{176 (2015). 12. Sajedi, M.A. An improved TOPSIS/EFQM methodology for evaluating the performance of organizations", Life Sci. J., 10(1), pp. 4315{4322 (2013). 13. Aydin, S., Kahraman, C., and Kaya, _I. A new fuzzy multicriteria decision making approach: An application for European quality award assessment", Knowledge Based Systems, 32, pp. 37{46 (2012). 14. Daniel, J., Yusu_, R.M., and Jassbi, J. Assessment system based on fuzzy scoring in European foundation for quality management (EFQM): Business excellence model", 5(15), pp. 6209{6220 (2011). 15. Dodangeh, J., Yusu_, R.M., Ismail, N., et al. Designing fuzzy multi criteria decision making model for best selection of areas for improvement in European foundation for quality management (EFQM) model", Afr J. Bus. Manag., 5(12), p. 5010 (2011). 16. Paghaleh, M.J. Performance measurement by EFQM excellence model with fuzzy approach", Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 5(10), pp. 1020{1024 (2001). 17. Kahveci, T.C. The institutionalization and the enterprise modeling in the manufacturing _rms", Dissertation, Sakarya University (2007). 18. Din_c, E. Muhasebe bilgi sistemi ve kurumsalla_sma duzeyi aras_ndaki ili_skiye yonelik bir ara_st_rma", Sosyal ve Ekonomik Ara_st_rmalar Dergisi, 27(1), pp. 21{50 (2014). 19. Alpay, G., Bodur, M., Y_lmaz, C., et al. Performance implications of institutionalization process in familyowned businesses: evidence from an emerging economy", Journal World Business, 43(4), pp. 435{448 (2008). 892  O. Uygun et al./Scientia Iranica, Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 27 (2020) 880{892 20. Uygun,  O., Kahveci, T.C., Ta_sk_n, H., et al. Readiness assessment model for institutionalization of SMEs using fuzzy hybrid MCDM techniques", Computer Industrial Engineering, 88(1), pp. 217{228 (2015). 21. C_ omlek, O.  Ozde_gerlendirme ve verimlilik analizi yoluyla performans de_gerlendirmeye yonelik bir model onerisi", Dissertation, Gebze Yuksek Teknoloji Enstit usu _I_sletme Anabilim Dal_ (2009). 22. Chaghooshi, A.J., Rahmani, M., and Mohammad, K.Z. Formulation and prioritization of strategies in tile and ceramic industry: a case study", N. Y. Sci. J., 5(6), pp. 79{87 (2012). 23. Wu, H.Y., Lin, Y.K., and Chang, C.H. Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard", Evaluation Program Plan, 34(1), pp. 37{50 (2011). 24. Liou, J.H. and Chuang, Y.T. Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers", Expert Syst. Appl., 37(5), pp. 3755{3761 (2010). 25. Lin, C.J., and Wu, W.W. A fuzzy extension of the dematel method for group decision making", Eur. J. Oper. Res., 156, pp. 445{455 (2004). 26. Lin, C.J. and Wu, W.W. A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment", Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., 34(1), pp. 205{213 (2008). 27. Saaty, T.L. The analytic network process. In Decision making with the analytic network process", Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 1{26 (2006). 28. Chang, D.Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP", Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95(3), pp. 649{655 (1996). 29. Opricovic, S. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems", Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 2(1), pp. 5{21 (1998). 30. Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H. Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction", Computer Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 17(1), pp. 211{220 (2002). 31. Poyraz, B. The e_ects of self assessment study which is made on people criteria of European excellence model on human resources activities - a case study ", Dissertation, Dokuz Eylul University (2008).
Scientia Iranica
Volume 27, Issue 2
Transactions on Industrial Engineering (E)
March and April 2020
Pages 880-892

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics