Flood hazard risk evaluation using fuzzy logic and weightage-based combination methods in geographic information system

Document Type : Article


Department of Civil Engineering, Sakarya University, 54187 Sakarya, Turkey


This study addresses the crucial variables contributing highly to the risk of flooding based on the flood characteristics of the Waverly region and develop a fuzzy logic and geographic information based urban flood map with flood zones in Waverly City, Iowa. The methodology emphasizes on weighting crucial variables using spatial analyst tools and fuzzy logic based GIS mapping. Local elevation, distance from Cedar River, land use and population density in Waverly city are recognized as effective variables to risk of flooding in Waverly city. Twenty three calibration tests for determination of weightages of these variables on the risk of flood were performed and compared to previously produced Waverly flood risk maps. Finally, weightages of these variables were assigned as 70 % for elevation, 20 % for distance from Cedar River, 5 % for Manning’s coefficient, and 5 % for population density. In a fuzzy environment they were assigned different fuzzy membership functions, for elevation, fuzzification technique Small was used, for distance, fuzzification technique MS Small was used, for Manning’s coefficient and population density, fuzzification technique Large was used. The flood hazard maps created were overlaid with 100 and 500-year flood maps of Waverly city for calibration and risk evaluation.


Main Subjects

1. Alderman, K., Turner, L.R., and Tong, S. Floods and  human health", A Systematic Review. Environ. Int.,  47, pp. 37{47 (2012).  2. Al-Hanbali, A., Alsaaideh, B., and Kondoh, A. Using  GIS-based weighted linear combination analysis and  remote sensing techniques to select optimum solid  waste disposal sites within Mafraq City", Jordan. J.  Geogr. Inform. Syst., 3(4), pp. 267{278 (2011).  3. Phong, T., Rajib, S., Guillaume, C., and Norton, J.  GIS and local knowledge in disaster management:  a case study of ood risk mapping in Viet Nam",  Disasters, 33(1), pp. 152{169 (2009).  4. Chang, H. and Franczyk, J. Climate change, land-use  change and oods: Toward an integrated assessment",  Geogr. Compass, 5(2), pp. 1549{1579 (2008).  5. Aydi, A., Zairi, M., and Dhia, B.H. Minimization  of environmental risk of land_ll site using fuzzy logic,  analytical hierarchy process and weighted linear combination  methodology in a geographic information  system environment", Environ. Earth Sci., 68(5), pp.  1375{1389 (2012).  6. Camarasa B.A.M., L_opez-Garc__a, M.J., and Soriano-  Garc__a, J. Mapping temporally-variable exposure to  ooding in small Mediterranean basins using land-use  indicators", Appl. Geogr., 31(1), pp. 136{145 (2011).  7. Malczewski, J., GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis,  John Wiley and Son, Toronto (1999).  528 O. Sonmez and H. Bizimana/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 27 (2020) 517{528  8. Mirzapour Al-E-Hashem, S.M.J., Malekly, H., and  Aryanezhad, M.B. A multi-objective robust optimization  model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production  planning in a supply chain under uncertainty",  Int. J. Prod. Econ., 134(1), pp. 28{42 (2011).  9. Mohd, M.S., Alias, B., and Daud, D. GIS analysis for  ood hazard mapping: Case study; Segamat, Johor,  West Malaysia", Proceeding of National Seminar on  Geographic Information System Application for Mitigation  in Natural Disaster, pp. 1{15 (2006).  10. Itami, R. and Cotter, M. Application of analytical  hierarchy process to rank issues, projects and sites  in integrated catchment management", In Proc. the  2nd International Conference on Multiple Objective  Decision Support Systems for Land, Water and Environmental  Management, Queensland Department of  Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane, Australia  (2012).  11. Tao, Z.H. and Jingdong, W. Application of analytic  hierarchy process in debris ow risk degree assessment  - a case study of Miyun County, Beijing City", Bulletin  of Soil and Water Conservation, 28(5), pp. 6{10  (2008).  12. Lawal, D., Matori, A., Hashim, A., Yusof, K., and  Chandio, I. Detecting ood susceptible areas using  GIS-based analytic hierarchy process", In Proc. International  Conference on Future Environment and  Energy, 28, pp. 3{4 (2015).  13. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2015/http://  www.fema.gov/ood-zone  14. Chaochao, L. and Xiaotao, C. A frame work for  ood risk analysis and bene_t assessment of ood  control measures in urban areas", Int. J. of River  Basin Management, 13, pp. 13{15 (2016).  15. Brito, M. and Evers, M. Multi-criteria decisionmaking  for ood risk management: a survey of the  current state of the art", Supplement of Natural Hazard  Earth System, 16, pp. 1029{1033 (2016).  16. Das, E. An aggregate fuzzy risk analysis for ood  incident management", Int. J. of System Assurance  Engineering and Management, 24, pp. 87{93 (2011).  17. Kourgialas, K. Flood management and a GIS modeling  method to assess ood-hazard areas", Hydrological  Sciences Journal, 11, pp. 123{132 (2016).  18. Li E. Impact assessment of urbanization on ood risk  in the Yangtze River Delta", Stochastic Environmental  Research and Risk Assessment, 27, pp. 25{37 (2016).  19. Sonmez, O. 2D Flood Modelling and Flood map  production in Rivers", Sakarya University, Institute  of Applied Sciences, Sakarya., pp. 60{80, Sakarya,  Turkey (2013).