Effect of stress direction on the undrained monotonic and cyclic behavior of dense sands

Document Type : Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Azadi Ave., Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Civil, Water, and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran


Geotechnical design may be unsafe if the anisotropic behaviour of soil is not considered. The behaviour of anisotropic materials depends on the principal stresses and their directions. A detailed experimental programme was conducted to study the effect of stress direction on the monotonic and cyclic behaviour of dense sand. A total of 20 undrained tests were performed at a constant mean confining stress (σ'0m) constant intermediate principal stress ratio (b= (σ23)/(σ13)), and principal stress directions (α). Two fine sands, Babolsar and Toyoura, were selected as the test materials. The isotropic consolidated specimens were prepared using the wet tamping technique. The results showed that the major principal stress direction had little considerable effect on the mobilized friction angle at steady state or phase transformation. The results showed that stress direction had a significant effect on the non-coaxiality between the principal strain increment direction and the principal stress direction. The soil fabric was led to significant non-coaxiality value before the peak shear strength. Increasing the octahedral shear strains decreased the non-coaxiality value due to destruction of the soil particle interlock (soil fabric). The effect of stress direction on non-coaxiality and excess pore water pressure generation was also investigated.


Main Subjects

1. Roscoe, K.H., Bassett, R.H., and Cole, E.R. Principal
axes observed during simple shear of a sand", Proceedings
of the Geotech Conference, Oslo, 1, pp. 231{237
2. Arthur, J.R.F., Chua, K.S., and Dunstan, T. Induced
anisotropy in a sand", Geotechnique, 27, pp. 13{30
(1977). http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.4.471
3. Yu, H.S., Plasticity and Geotechnics, Springer (2006).
4. Airey, D.W., Budhu, M., and Wood, D.M. Some
aspects of the behaviour of soils in simple shear",
In Development in Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Engineering, P.K. Banerjee and R. Butter eld, Eds.,
Elsevier, 2, pp. 185{213 (1985).
5. Saada, A.S. and Baah, A.K. Deformation and failure
of a cross anisotropic clay under combined stresses",
Proc. 3rd Pan Am. Conf. Soil Mech., Caracas, 1, pp.
67{88 (1967).
6. Lade, P.V. Torsion shear tests on cohesionless soil",
Proc. 5th Pan Am. Conf. Soil Mech., Buenos Aires, 1,
pp. 117{127 (1975).
7. Hight, D.W., Gens, A., and Symes, M.J. The
development of a new hollow cylinder apparatus
for investigating the e ects of principal rotation in
Soils", Geotechnique, 33(4), pp. 355{383 (1983).
8. Lade, P.V., Nam, J., and Hong, W.P. Shear
banding and cross-anisotropic behavior observed
in laboratory sand tests with stress rotation",
Can. Geotech. J., 45(1), pp. 74{84 (2008).
9. Lade, P.V., Nam, J., and Hong, W.P. Interpretation
of strains in torsion shear tests", Computers
and Geotechnics, 36, pp. 211{225 (2009).
10. Rodriguez, N.M. and Lade, P.V. E ects of principal
stress directions and mean normal stress on failure
criterion for cross-anisotropic sand", Journal of Engineering
Mechanics, 139(11), pp. 1592{1601 (2013).
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000595
11. Arthur, J.R.F. and Menzies, B.K. Inherent anisotropy
in a sand", Geotechnique, 22(1), pp. 115{128 (1972).
12. Oda, M. Initial fabric and their relations to mechanical
properties of granular material", Soils and
Foundations, 12(1), pp. 17-36 (1972).
13. Matsuoka, H. A microscopic study on shear mechanism
of granular materials", Soils and Foundations,
14(1), pp. 29{43 (1974).
14. Nemat-Nasser, S. A micromechanically-based constitutive
model for frictional deformation of granular
materials", Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of
Solids, 48(6-7), pp. 1541{1563 (2000).
15. Matsuoka, H. and Geka, H. A stress-strain model
for granular materials considering mechanism of fabric
change", Soils and Foundations, 23(2), pp. 83{97
16. Rothenburg, L. and Bathurst, R.J. Analytical study
of induced anisotropy in idealized granular materials",
Geotechnique, 39(4), pp. 601{614 (1989).
17. Oda, M. Inherent and induced anisotropy in plasticity
theory of granular soils", Mechanics of Materials,
16(1-2), pp. 35{45 (1993).
18. Li, X.S. and Dafalias, Y.F. Constitutive modeling
of inherently anisotropic sand behaviour", Journal
of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,
128(10), pp. 868{880 (2002).
19. Guo, P.J. and Stolle, D.F. On the failure of granular
materials with fabric e ects", Soils and Foundations,
45(4), pp. 1{12 (2005).
20. Radjai, F. and Azema, E. Shear strength of granular
materials", European Journal of Environmental and
Civil Engineering, 13(2), pp. 203{218 (2009).
21. Wrzesinski, G. and Lechowicz, Z. In
uence of the
rotation of principal stress directions on undrained
F. Jafarzadeh and M. Zamanian/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 27 (2020) 551{565 563
shear strength", Annals of Warsaw University of Life
Sciences-SGGW, Land Reclamation, 45(2), pp. 183{
192 (2013).
22. Al-Rkaby, A.H., Chegenizadeh, A., and Nikraz, H.R.
Directional-dependence in the mechanical characteristics
of sand: a review", International Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering, 10(5), pp. 499{509 (2016).
23. Casagrande, A. and Carillo, N. Shear failure of
anisotropic materials", J. Boston Soc. Civil Eng.,
31(4), pp. 122{135 (1944).
24. Parkin, A.K., Gerrard, C.M., and Willougby, D.R.
Discussion on deformation of sand in shear", Journal
of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 94(1), pp.
336{340 (1968).
25. Arthur, J.R.F. and Assadi, A. Ruptured sand sheared
in plane strain", Proceeding 9th International Conference
on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,
Tokyo, pp. 19{22 (1977).
26. Li, X. and Yu, H.S. In
uence of loading direction
on the behaviour of anisotropic granular materials",
International Journal of Engineering Science, 47, pp.
1284{1296 (2009).
27. Yang, L.T., Li, X., Yu, H.S., and Wanatowski, D. A
laboratory study of anisotropic geomaterials incorporating
recent micromechanical understanding", Acta
Geotechnica, 11(5), pp. 1{19 (2015a).
28. Yang, Y., Fei, W., Yu, H.S., Ooi, J., and Rotter, M.
Experimental study of anisotropy and non-coaxiality
of granular solids", Granular Matter., 17(2), pp. 189{
196 (2015b).
29. Symes, M.J., Gens, A., and Hight, D.W. Undrained
anisotropy and principal stress rotation in saturated
sand", Geotechnique, 34(1), pp. 11{27 (1984).
30. Wong, R.K.S. and Arthur, J.F.R. Induced and inherent
anisotropy in sand", Geotechnique, 35(4), pp.
471{481 (1985).
31. Chan, F.W.K. and Brown, S.F. Signi cance of principal
stress rotation in pavements", Proceedings of the
13th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, New Delhi, India, pp. 1823{
1826 (1994).
32. Towhata, I., Kawasaki, Y., Harada, N., and Sunaga,
M. Contraction of soil subjected to trac-type stress
application", Proceedings of the International Symposium
on Pre-Failure Deformation Characteristics of
Geomaterials, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 305{310 (1994).
33. Yang, Z.X., Li, X.S., and Yang, J. Undrained
anisotropy and rotational shear in granular soil",
Geotechnique, 57(4), pp. 371{384 (2007).
34. Lade, P.V. and Duncan, J.M. Cubical triaxial tests on
cohesionless soil", Journal of the Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Division, ASCE, 99(SM10), pp. 793{811
35. Ochiai, H. and Lade, P.V. Three-dimensional behavior
of sand with anisotropic fabric", J. Geotech. Eng.,
109(10), pp. 1313{1328 (1983).
36. Tatsuoka, F. Stress-strain behavior of an idealized
anisotropic granular material", Soils and Foundations,
20(3), pp. 75{90 (1980).
37. Shibuya, S. Undrained behaviour of granular materials
under principal stress rotation", PhD. Thesis,
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine,
University of London (1985).
38. Shibuya, S. and Hight, D.W. On the stress path
in simple shear", Geotechnique, 37(4), pp. 511{515
39. Shibuya, S., Hight, D.W., and Jardine, R.J. Fourdimensional
local boundary surfaces of an isotropically
consolidated loose sand", Soils and Foundations,
43(2), pp. 89{103 (2003a).
40. Shibuya, S., Hight, D.W., and Jardine, R.J. Local
boundary surfaces of a loose sand dependent on consolidation
path", Soils and Foundations, 43(3), pp. 85{93
41. Azami, A., Pietruszczak, S., and Guo, P. Bearing capacity
of shallow foundations in transversely isotropic
granular media", International Journal for Numerical
and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 34(8), pp.
771{793 (2010).
42. Bahadori, H., Ghalandarzadeh, A., and Towhata, I.
E ect of non-plastic silt on anisotropic behaviour
of sand", Soil and Foundations, 48(4), pp. 531{545
43. Keyhani, R. and Haeri, S.M. Evaluation of the e ect
of anisotropic consolidation and principle stress rotation
on undrained behaviour of silty sands", Scientia
Iranica, 20(6), pp. 1637{1653 (2013).
44. Jafarzadeh, F. and Zamanian, M. E ect of intermediate
principal stress parameter on cyclic behaviour of
Sand", Scientia Iranica, 21(5), pp. 1566{1576 (2014).
45. Lade, P., Rodriguez, N., and Van Dyck, E.
E ects of principal stress directions on 3D
failure conditions in cross-anisotropic sand", J.
Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 140(2), 04013001 (2014).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943{
46. Sadrekarimi, A. E ect of the mode of shear on static
liquefaction analysis", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.,
140(12), 04014069 (2014).
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001182
47. Sadrekarimi, A. Static liquefaction analysis considering
principal stress directions and anisotropy",
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 34(4), pp.
1135{1154 (2016).
48. Khayat, N., Ghalandarzadeh, N., and Jafari, M.K.
Grain shape e ect on the anisotropic behaviour of siltsand
mixtures", Proceedings of the ICE - Geotechnical
Engineering, 167(3), pp. 281{296 (2012).
49. ASTM Standard test method for particle-size analysis
of soils", D422-63 (2007).
564 F. Jafarzadeh and M. Zamanian/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 27 (2020) 551{565
50. ASTM Standard test methods for maximum index
density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory
table", D4253-00 (2003).
51. ASTM Standard test methods for minimum index
density and unit weight of soils and calculation of
relative density", D4254-00 (2003).
52. ASTM Standard test methods for speci c gravity
of soil solids by water pycnometer", D854-02 (2006).
53. Ladd, R.S. Preparing test specimens using under
compaction", Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM,
1(1), pp. 16{23 (1978).
54. Hoeg, K., Dyvik, R., and Sandbaekken, G. Strength
of undistrubed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand
specimens", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering, 126(7), pp. 606{617 (2000). DOI:
55. Boulanger, R.W., Seed, R.B., Chan, C.K., Seed,
H.B., and Sousa, J. Liquefaction behaviour of saturated
sands under unidirectional and bi-directional
monotonic and cyclic simple shear loading", Rep. No.
UCB/GT/91-08, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
56. Polito, C., Green, R., and Lee, J. Pore pressure
generation models for sands and silty soils
subjected to cyclic loading", J. Geotech. Geoenviron.
Eng., 134(10), pp. 1490{1500 (2008). DOI:
57. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R.B., and Mesri, G., Soil Mechanics
in Engineering Practice, 3rd Ed., London: Wiley
58. Lee, K.L. and Seed, H.B. Drained strength characteristics
of sands", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE,
93(SM6), pp. 117{141 (1967).
59. Negussey, D., Wijewickreme, W.K.D., and Vaid, Y.P.
Constant volume friction angle of granular materials",
Can. Geotech. J., 25(1), pp. 50{55 (1988).
60. Been, K. and Je eries, M.G. A state parameter for
sands", Geotechnique, 35(2), pp. 99{112 (1985). Doi:
61. Wan, R.G. and Guo, R.G. A pressure and density
dependent dilatancy model for granular materials,
Soils Found., 39(6), pp. 1{12 (1999).
62. Dietz, M.S. and Lings, M.L. Postpeak strength of
interfaces in a stress-dilatancy framework", J. Geotech.
Geoenviron. Engng., 132(11), pp. 1474{1484 (2006).
63. Sadrekarimi, A. and Olson, S.M. Critical state friction
angle of sands", Geotechnique, 61(9), pp. 771{783
64. Yang, S.L., Sandven, R., and Grande, L. Steadystate
lines of sand-silt mixtures", Canadian Geotechnical
Journal, 43(11), pp. 1213{1219 (2006). Doi:
65. Mahmood, A. and Mitchell, J.K. Fabric-property
relationships in ne granular materials", Clays and
Clay Minerals, 22, pp. 397{408 (1974).
66. Miura, K., Miura, S., and Toki, S. Deformation
behaviour of anisotropic dense sand under principal
stress axes rotation", Soils and Foundations, 26(1), pp.
36{52 (1986).
67. Luan, M., Xu, C., He, Y., Guo, Y., Zhang, Z., Jin, D.,
and Fan, Q. Experimental study on shear behaviour
and an improved constitutive model of saturated sand
under complex stress condition", In Proceedings of the
Fourth International Conference on Soft Soil Engineering,
D.H. Chan and K.T. Law, Eds., CRC Press,
Vancouver, Canada, pp. 73{92 (2007).
68. Guo, P. Modi ed direct shear test for anisotropic
strength of sand", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering, ASCE, 134(9), pp. 1311{
1318 (2008).
69. Towhata, I. and Ishihara, K. Undrained strength
of sand undergoing cyclic rotation of principal stress
axes", Soils and Foundations, 25(2), pp. 135{147
70. Riemer, M.F. and Seed, R.B. Factors a ecting the
apparent position of steady state line", J. Geotech.
Geoenviron. Engng, ASCE, 123(3), pp. 281{288
71. Cai, Y. An experimental study of non-coaxial soil
behaviour using hollow cylinder testing", Doctoral
dissertation, University of Nottingham (2010).
72. Cai, Y., Yu, H.S., Wanatowski, D., and Li, X. Noncoaxial
behaviour of sand under various stress paths",
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,
139(8), pp. 1381{1395 (2012).
73. Logeswaran, P. Behaviour of sands under generalized
loading and drainage conditions", PhD Thesis, Carleton
University, Ottawa, Canada, p. 273 (2010).
74. Vipulanantham, M. Initial stress state and stress
history e ects on liquefaction susceptibility of Sands",
M.Sc. Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, p.
180 (2011).