Optimal design of monopile offshore wind turbine structures using CBO, ECBO, and VPS algorithms

Document Type : Article


1 Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, P.O. Box 16846-13114, Iran.

2 School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, P.O. Box 16846-13114, Iran.


Considering both size and dimensions of the offshore wind turbine structures, design optimization of such structures is a fruitful yet, simultaneously, onerous task due to the tempestuous complexity of the problem, which mostly comes from their environment. However, in this study, a computerized methodology based on meta-heuristic algorithms, consisting of the Colliding Bodies Optimization (CBO), Enhanced Colliding Bodies Optimization (ECBO), and Vibrating Particle System (VPS), is presented such that more economic upshots can be accomplished. Hence, minimization of the total weight of the structure subjected to a number of structural constraints, including a frequency constraint, by applying the above mentioned algorithms is the underlying goal of this study. Using the data from Horns Rev I offshore wind farm, which is located in the coastlines of Denmark in the North Sea, this study is performed based on a simplified structural model of a monopile offshore wind turbine structure, which can be utilized in preliminary stages of pertinent projects for conducting suitable comparisons.


Main Subjects

1. Lynn, Paul A., Onshore and O_shore Wind Energy: An Introduction, John Wiley and Sons (2011). 2. Karimirad, M., O_shore Energy Structures: for Wind Power, Wave Energy and Hybrid Marine Platforms, Springer (2014). 3. Muskulus, M. and Schafhirt, S. Design optimization of wind turbine support structures - a review", J. Ocean Wind Ener., 1(1), pp. 12-22 (2014). 4. Kaveh, A., Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures, Second edition, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2017). 5. Kaveh, A. and Mahdavi, V.R., Colliding Bodies Optimization: Extensions and Applications, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2015). 6. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search", Acta Mech., 213(3), pp. 267-289 (2010) 7. Kaveh, A. and Ilchi Ghazaan, M. A new metaheuristic algorithm: vibrating particles system", Sci. Iran., Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 24(2), pp. 551-566 (2017). 8. Gholizadeh, S. and Seyedpoor, S.M. Shape optimization of arch dams by metaheuristics and neural networks for frequency constraints", Sci. Iran., Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 18(5), pp. 1020-1027 (2011). 9. Gholizadeh, S. and Shahrezaei, A.M. Optimal placement of steel plate shear walls for steel frames by bat algorithm", Struct Des. Tall Special Build., 24(1), pp. 1-18 (2015). 10. Kaveh, A., Applications of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Civil Engineering, Springer Verlag. Switzerland (2017). 11. Kaveh, A., Ghafari, M.H., and Gholipour, Y. Optimum seismic design of steel frames considering the connection types", J. Construct. Steel Res., 130, pp. 79-87 (2017). 12. Kaveh, A. and Nasrollahi, A. A hybrid charged system search and particle swarm optimization for optimal design of engineering structures", Sci. Iran., Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 21(2), pp. 295-305 (2014). 13. Kaveh, A. and Javadi, S.M. Shape and size optimization of trusses with multiple frequency constraints using harmony search and ray optimizer for enhancing the particle swarm optimization algorithm", Acta Mech., 225(6), pp. 1595-1605 (2014). 14. Kaveh, A. and Rezaie, M. Topology and geometry optimization of single layer domes utilizing colliding bodies optimization", Sci. Iran., Transactions A, Civil Engineering, 23(2), pp. 535-547 (2016). 15. Kaveh, A., Mahdavi, V.R., and Kamalinejad, M. Optimal design of the monopole structures using CBO and ECBO algorithms", Period. Polytech. - Civil Eng. Trans., 61(1), pp. 110-116 (2017). 16. Kaveh, A. and Ilchi Ghazaan, M. Enhanced colliding bodies algorithm for truss optimization with frequency constraints", J. Comput. Civil Eng., 29(6) (Nov. 2015). 17. Thiry, A., Rigo, P., Buldgen, L., Raboni, G., and Bair, F. Optimization of monopile o_shore wind structures", Advances in Marine Structures, pp. 633- 642 (2011). 18. Veritas, D.N. Design of o_shore wind turbine structures", O_shore Standard, DNV-OS-J101 (2014). 19. Veritas, D.N. Design and manufacture of wind turbine blades, o_shore and onshore wind turbines", DNV Standard, DNV-DS-J102 (2010). 1248 A. Kaveh and S. Sabeti/Scientia Iranica, Transactions A: Civil Engineering 26 (2019) 1232{1248 20. Tempel, J. van der Design of support structures for o_shore wind turbines", PhD. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Section O_shore Engineering (2006). 21. Leite, O.B. Review of design procedures for monopile o_shore wind structures", Master Thesis, University of Porto (2015). 22. Bhattacharya, S., Cox, J.A., Lombardi, D., and Wood, D.M. Dynamic of o_shore wind turbines supported on two foundations-article", Geotech. Eng., 166, pp. 159- 169 (2013). 23. Quilligan, A., O'Connor, A., and Pakrashi, V. Fragility analysis of steel and concrete wind turbine towers", Eng. Struct., 36, pp. 270-282 (2012). 24. Hartog J.P.D., Recent Technical Manifestations of Von Karman's Vortex Wake, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering (1953). 25. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1- 1: General rules and rules for buildings", European Committee for Standardization (2010).